Discussion:
Dangerous climate change is likely, concludes new research
Add Reply
gordo
2018-07-01 18:09:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Dangerous climate change is likely, concludes new research
June 26, 2018, University of Sheffield
A new study has revealed sensitive regions of the world are still at
risk from the dangerous and potentially irreversible effects of
climate change; even if we meet the target of not increasing global
temperature above 1.5°C over the next 100 years.

The research, led by The Open University in collaboration with the
University of Sheffield, reviewed the targets set in the 2015 Paris
Climate Agreement and concluded that regions of the world, such as the
Arctic and South-East Asian monsoon region, could be damaged
irreversibly as they are particularly sensitive to changes to global
temperatures.

The international team of researchers developed a three-dimensional
climate-carbon cycle model, and simulated the different climate
futures.


Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2018-06-dangerous-climate.html#jCp

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
Catoni
2018-07-01 20:47:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by gordo
Dangerous climate change is likely, concludes new research
June 26, 2018, University of Sheffield
A new study has revealed sensitive regions of the world are still at
risk from the dangerous and potentially irreversible effects of
climate change; even if we meet the target of not increasing global
temperature above 1.5°C over the next 100 years.
The research, led by The Open University in collaboration with the
University of Sheffield, reviewed the targets set in the 2015 Paris
Climate Agreement and concluded that regions of the world, such as the
Arctic and South-East Asian monsoon region, could be damaged
irreversibly as they are particularly sensitive to changes to global
temperatures.
What's your point ? ? Climate has always been changing... You expect things to stay the same ? ? ?

Why should nature listen to YOU ? ? ? ARE YOU GOD ? ?

Why aren't you still 30 years old? ?

The only gaurantee in existance is IMPERMANENCE ! ! ! NOTHING STAYS THE SAME...

CHANGE IS CONSTANT ! !
Catoni
2018-07-01 20:48:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by gordo
Dangerous climate change is likely, concludes new research
June 26, 2018, University of Sheffield
YEAH..... YEAH..... YEAH ! ! !

You've been telling us for more than thirty years now.... .

We're still waiting...
k***@gmail.com
2018-07-02 00:15:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Well tell these soothsayers to document their scientific conclusions and submit it to US law where every point in their presentation can be evaluated for fraud and ommision and inform them that mistakes are inexcusable and will be prosecuted as a crime.

Over past 20 yrs, average temperature is Flat.
Trend for 15 yrs to 2016, about 1.5degC per century.

The concept developed in 2009 to sell the politicians chunks of temperature according to pledges of rate reductions, based on direct correlation of supposed temperature increase since industrialization and overall quantity of human emissions is a total joke.

The scientific community cannot adequately criticize and reject this total bullshit, although this bullshit is the foundation of the Paris Accord.

We'll see how it does in an honest and direct evaluation with those on trial for propagated this fraud and aggression against the sanctity and survival of the US.
Kym Horsell
2018-07-02 00:25:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Dear geriatric hillbilly,

Sorry. 30 yeperiod over which climate trends are significant.
Over 20 years there is typically to much noise to make any decision on trend.
This is expected and well-documented for the past 30 years.
Not that anyone expects dummies to be able to read.

Your pal,

Doc Cletus
k***@gmail.com
2018-07-02 00:39:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
So you're saying now that we need 30 yrs to draw any analysis when your on here everday warnng of monthly records, which all in all, show no warming trend over 20 yrs.

Take it into US Fedeal court. All your statements of warming trend in later part of 20th century are false also.

You guys are a total joke. And the only ones believing your own stupid ass propaganda.
k***@gmail.com
2018-07-02 11:17:07 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
.... Dear geriatric hillbilly,

Sorry. 30 yeperiod over which climate trends are significant.
Over 20 years there is typically to much noise to make any decision on trend.
This is expected and well-documented for the past 30 years.
Not that anyone expects dummies to be able to read.

Your pal,

Doc Cletus
......

So whats your thing?
You evade any actual facts of climate or global warming.
You ignore the fact that no emmision reduction plan can affect even emissions.
You ignore the fact that no program will ever be instilled or maintained in the US.
Such attempts will only result in complete death of political party responsible, and criminal prosecution for the fraudists.

But you continue to outline your hostilty and wish to attack us for our use of carbon for which you cannot explain any justification for your pretense of concern for people or the environment.

You obviously have no credentials, no job, no life and certainly no woman.
No woman would live with you in your mothers basement, or put up with your internet personage of a total idiot.

Or your three blowup dolls of algore, obama, and J Hansen, with which you find so much enjoyment in your petulant life of holy war against society and rational people.

Hahhahhahaahahahahah
k***@gmail.com
2018-07-02 12:14:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
....
Sorry. 30 yeperiod over which climate trends are significant.
Over 20 years there is typically to much noise to make any decision on trend.
This is expected and well-documented for the past 30 years.
Not that anyone expects dummies to be able to read. ...
.....

All of this only means there will be no actual science of climatology until we have 2 or 3 thirty year periods in which accurate temperature readings are taken that do not have to be 'corrected'.

British world temperature records were the most extensive and standardized from before WWII. In the hands of CRU E Anglia.
These statistics were entered into computer code. Hard copies were destroyed. Then they say when moving their computers, they screwed up and lost the code with the original entries. But they furnish statistics in which they've made 'corrections'.

These statistics only date back to about 1880.

US temperature statistics show temperatures higher in the 1930s. When Hansen got caught doing the unjustified 'double' correction which he had to admit to, even though only changing things by 10ths of a degree, it changed the status of the 30s being warmer than present in US statistics.

The corrected temperatures from CRU, show an upward trend and portrays the 30s as only a bump.

The proxie tree ring studies from the Ural mointains show a 'DECLNE' in temperatures of the twentieth century.

Get back with us in 100 yrs when your science does not depend on the subjective and often irrational corrections of the corrupt climate enthusiasts.
k***@gmail.com
2018-07-09 14:18:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Us carbon users have determined that your bitching and whining about co2, climate and DOOMSDAY SCENARIO can be hazardous to your health.
k***@gmail.com
2018-07-02 00:32:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
""If you accept the 2°C target, the world need to emit no more than 465 GtC by the time carbon emissions end. Many developing countries also support a reduction in the target to keep global average temperature increases below 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels."""

World emmisions are nearing 50 billion tons per yr. This is why current emissions statistics are omited and falsified.

This emission rate is growing rapidly, which is why these fraudists have developed the false propaganda chant that world emissions have 'stabilized'.

Even if held steady at 50 billion per yr, the 465 quantity and prophesied DOOMSDAY SCENARIO, would be reached in 9 years.

The lie used by OBAMA, THE CLIMATE MEISTER, to garner the pledges of the Paris, 'Save the Climate' telethon based on chunks of emmision rates falsely construed as total quantites is an absolute farce and deliberate fraud.

But if these theoretical experts feel confident in their theoretical science and calls to end the use of carbon, they should have no fear of intrinsic review of EVERY DETAIL of their formal submissions before US law.
Loading...