Discussion:
A "Pause" Implies A Temporary Cherry Picked Event; Deniers Should Have Been Claiming Cessation.
Add Reply
Bret Cahill
2014-06-20 18:20:59 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Even using the word "pause" in land or surface temps tacitly admits that the 600 mW / m^2 imbalance in radiation has been accumulating somewhere else, in the ocean and undocumented melted land ice and will, as certain as conservation of energy, eventually reappear in land / surface temps with a vengeance.

This is why Watts back pedaled so furiously on the "pause." He suspects the "pause" is over and will no longer be useful for HFUD.

The real question is why deniers were even using the word "pause" in the first place? Deniers should have been using the word "cessation."

A pause implies that it is a temporary event, a cherry picked time range that will not make it through the low pass filter that matters when it comes to public policy on CO2 management.


Bret Cahill
Bret Cahill
2014-06-21 17:24:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Bret Cahill
Even using the word "pause" in land or surface temps tacitly admits that the 600 mW / m^2 imbalance in radiation has been accumulating somewhere else, in the ocean and undocumented melted land ice and will, as certain as conservation of energy, eventually reappear in land / surface temps with a vengeance.
This is why Watts back pedaled so furiously on the "pause." He suspects the "pause" is over and will no longer be useful for HFUD.
The real question is why deniers were even using the word "pause" in the first place? Deniers should have been using the word "cessation."
A pause implies that it is a temporary event, a cherry picked time range that will not make it through the low pass filter that matters when it comes to public policy on CO2 management.
<crickets>
Desertphile
2014-09-02 15:02:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 11:20:59 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill
Post by Bret Cahill
Even using the word "pause" in land or surface temps tacitly admits
that the 600 mW / m^2 imbalance in radiation has been accumulating
somewhere else, in the ocean and undocumented melted land ice and
will, as certain as conservation of energy, eventually reappear in
land / surface temps with a vengeance.
This is why Watts back pedaled so furiously on the "pause." He
suspects the "pause" is over and will no longer be useful for HFUD.
The real question is why deniers were even using the word "pause"
in the first place? Deniers should have been using the word "cessation."
A pause implies that it is a temporary event, a cherry picked
time range that will not make it through the low pass filter
that matters when it comes to public policy on CO2 management.
There is no known mechanism by which human-caused climate change can
"pause." I suppose it would take magic: the gods might be able to make it
pause.
Post by Bret Cahill
Bret Cahill
--
"The ideal citizen of a politically corrupt state, such as the one we now have, is a
gullible dolt unable to tell truth from bullshit." -- _Age_of_Ignorance_ by Charles Simic
Tunderbar
2014-09-02 15:24:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Bret Cahill
Even using the word "pause" in land or surface temps tacitly admits that the 600 mW / m^2 imbalance in radiation has been accumulating somewhere else, in the ocean and undocumented melted land ice and will, as certain as conservation of energy, eventually reappear in land / surface temps with a vengeance.
This is why Watts back pedaled so furiously on the "pause." He suspects the "pause" is over and will no longer be useful for HFUD.
The real question is why deniers were even using the word "pause" in the first place? Deniers should have been using the word "cessation."
A pause implies that it is a temporary event, a cherry picked time range that will not make it through the low pass filter that matters when it comes to public policy on CO2 management.
Bret Cahill
It is a cessation. Pause = cessation of temps rising.

Read much?
Tunderbar
2014-09-02 15:32:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Bret Cahill
Even using the word "pause" in land or surface temps tacitly admits that the 600 mW / m^2 imbalance in radiation has been accumulating somewhere else, in the ocean and undocumented melted land ice and will, as certain as conservation of energy, eventually reappear in land / surface temps with a vengeance.
This is why Watts back pedaled so furiously on the "pause." He suspects the "pause" is over and will no longer be useful for HFUD.
The real question is why deniers were even using the word "pause" in the first place? Deniers should have been using the word "cessation."
A pause implies that it is a temporary event, a cherry picked time range that will not make it through the low pass filter that matters when it comes to public policy on CO2 management.
Bret Cahill
Loading Image...

The semantics don't matter. The simple fact is that temps have not risen in 19 years.

And the reason why this is an issue is that every single last solitary computer model and climate projection that came out of the IPCC process and from related climate "scientists" failed to predict that the temps would plateau like that. All predictions by alarmists said that temps were gonna keep rising. They haven't.

The globe has NOT WARMED in 19 years. There has been ZERO global warming in 19 years.
gordo
2014-09-02 18:48:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Tue, 2 Sep 2014 08:32:13 -0700 (PDT), Tunderbar
Post by Tunderbar
Post by Bret Cahill
Even using the word "pause" in land or surface temps tacitly admits that the 600 mW / m^2 imbalance in radiation has been accumulating somewhere else, in the ocean and undocumented melted land ice and will, as certain as conservation of energy, eventually reappear in land / surface temps with a vengeance.
This is why Watts back pedaled so furiously on the "pause." He suspects the "pause" is over and will no longer be useful for HFUD.
The real question is why deniers were even using the word "pause" in the first place? Deniers should have been using the word "cessation."
A pause implies that it is a temporary event, a cherry picked time range that will not make it through the low pass filter that matters when it comes to public policy on CO2 management.
Bret Cahill
https://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2014/09/19_years_pause.png
The semantics don't matter. The simple fact is that temps have not risen in 19 years.
And the reason why this is an issue is that every single last solitary computer model and climate projection that came out of the IPCC process and from related climate "scientists" failed to predict that the temps would plateau like that. All predictions by alarmists said that temps were gonna keep rising. They haven't.
The globe has NOT WARMED in 19 years. There has been ZERO global warming in 19 years.
NASA says you are full of heifer dust .
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/WorldOfChange/decadaltemp.php

Who to believe watts the shill or NASA ?
Bret Cahill
2017-08-12 18:24:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Bret Cahill
Even using the word "pause" in land or surface temps tacitly admits that the 600 mW / m^2 imbalance in radiation has been accumulating somewhere else, in the ocean and undocumented melted land ice and will, as certain as conservation of energy, eventually reappear in land / surface temps with a vengeance.
This is why Watts back pedaled so furiously on the "pause." He suspects the "pause" is over and will no longer be useful for HFUD.
The real question is why deniers were even using the word "pause" in the first place? Deniers should have been using the word "cessation."
A pause implies that it is a temporary event, a cherry picked time range that will not make it through the low pass filter that matters when it comes to public policy on CO2 management.
Bret Cahill
Loading...