Discussion:
Did scientists get it wrong about global warming?
(too old to reply)
Wally W.
2018-08-07 04:21:39 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message

Did scientists get it wrong about global warming?

Compare the body language of the pro-alarmist participant with that of
Dr. Lomborg.

Which behaves in ways that elicit more turst?

Which spews less double-talk?
Wally W.
2018-08-07 04:22:29 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Wally W.
http://youtu.be/aEkjhwkL7Ys
Did scientists get it wrong about global warming?
Compare the body language of the pro-alarmist participant with that of
Dr. Lomborg.
Which behaves in ways that elicit more trust?
Which spews less double-talk?
Bret Cahill
2018-08-07 04:50:33 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
?

?

?
gordo
2018-08-07 17:32:01 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Wally W.
http://youtu.be/aEkjhwkL7Ys
Did scientists get it wrong about global warming?
Compare the body language of the pro-alarmist participant with that of
Dr. Lomborg.
Which behaves in ways that elicit more turst?
Which spews less double-talk?
THIS IS THE LOMBORG-ERRORS WEB SITE
http://www.lomborg-errors.dk/
"Why is it essential to point out the errors?
First, because in the handling of errors, Lomborg does not act like
most persons would do. A normal person would apologize or be ashamed
if concrete, factual errors or misunderstandings were pointed out -
and would correct the errors at the first opportunity given. Lomborg
does not do that. "

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
Wally W.
2018-08-08 03:40:26 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by gordo
Post by Wally W.
http://youtu.be/aEkjhwkL7Ys
Did scientists get it wrong about global warming?
Compare the body language of the pro-alarmist participant with that of
Dr. Lomborg.
Which behaves in ways that elicit more turst?
Which spews less double-talk?
THIS IS THE LOMBORG-ERRORS WEB SITE
http://www.lomborg-errors.dk/
"Why is it essential to point out the errors?
First, because in the handling of errors, Lomborg does not act like
most persons would do. A normal person would apologize or be ashamed
if concrete, factual errors or misunderstandings were pointed out -
and would correct the errors at the first opportunity given. Lomborg
does not do that. "
... and climastrologists do?

Realize that predicting opposite effects for the same cause guarantees
that one of the predictions will be erroneous.

But do climastrologists ever apologize for spewing error from the
other side of their mouth when claiming credit for the "accurate"
prediction?

Ashleigh Brilliant — 'To be sure of hitting the target, shoot first,
and call whatever you hit the target'

Loading...