Discussion:
Two children burned after Dakota Access protesters set 20 fires during evacuation
Add Reply
Chom Noamsky
2017-02-23 17:05:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
The protestors just lit the camp on fire and walked away, taking no
responsibility for cleaning up their own mess. How much of that wood
and other construction material could have been recycled? How about the
toxic fumes released in the fire? Oh silly you, we're water protectors,
not air protectors. And the worst thing is their irresponsible method
of disposal resulted in two unfortunate kids getting burned, one of them
badly.

***

Two children were burned, one of them severely, at the Dakota Access
camp evacuation Wednesday after remaining activists set fire to about 20
shelters and a vehicle in what was described as a departure ceremony.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/feb/22/dakota-access-protesters-set-20-fires-during-evacu/
columbiaaccidentinvestigation
2017-02-23 17:40:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 9:05:46 AM UTC-8, Chom Noamsky wrote:""

more negative marketing, hey idiot the pipeline is a stupid idea
Chom Noamsky
2017-02-23 17:50:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
On Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 9:05:46 AM UTC-8, Chom Noamsky wrote:""
more negative marketing, hey idiot the pipeline is a stupid idea
Tell that to the people who consume 100 million barrels per day around
the world.

Including you.
columbiaaccidentinvestigation
2017-02-23 17:57:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
On Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 9:05:46 AM UTC-8, Chom Noamsky wrote:""
more negative marketing, hey idiot the pipeline is a stupid idea
Tell that to the people who consume 100 million barrels per day around
the world.
Including you.
Im telling that to everybody you idiot, consuming old wood for fuel needed to be left behind, it was replaced, now renewables are on the path to replacing fossil fuel.
Chom Noamsky
2017-02-23 18:20:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
On Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 9:05:46 AM UTC-8, Chom Noamsky wrote:""
more negative marketing, hey idiot the pipeline is a stupid idea
Tell that to the people who consume 100 million barrels per day around
the world.
Including you.
Im telling that to everybody you idiot, consuming old wood for fuel needed to be left behind, it was replaced, now renewables are on the path to replacing fossil fuel.
Including graphene-powered solar airplanes?
columbiaaccidentinvestigation
2017-02-23 18:37:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
On Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 9:05:46 AM UTC-8, Chom Noamsky wrote:""
more negative marketing, hey idiot the pipeline is a stupid idea
Tell that to the people who consume 100 million barrels per day around
the world.
Including you.
Im telling that to everybody you idiot, consuming old wood for fuel needed to be left behind, it was replaced, now renewables are on the path to replacing fossil fuel.
Including graphene-powered solar airplanes?
Dont know why you all have a sudden case of graphene-ophobia but it seems to have spread among you luddites pretty fast
Chom Noamsky
2017-02-23 19:47:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
On Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 9:05:46 AM UTC-8, Chom Noamsky wrote:""
more negative marketing, hey idiot the pipeline is a stupid idea
Tell that to the people who consume 100 million barrels per day around
the world.
Including you.
Im telling that to everybody you idiot, consuming old wood for fuel needed to be left behind, it was replaced, now renewables are on the path to replacing fossil fuel.
Including graphene-powered solar airplanes?
Dont know why you all have a sudden case of graphene-ophobia but it seems to have spread among you luddites pretty fast
Do you think this can be turned into graphene?

https://tinyurl.com/jneadrd
columbiaaccidentinvestigation
2017-02-23 19:54:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
On Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 9:05:46 AM UTC-8, Chom Noamsky wrote:""
more negative marketing, hey idiot the pipeline is a stupid idea
Tell that to the people who consume 100 million barrels per day around
the world.
Including you.
Im telling that to everybody you idiot, consuming old wood for fuel needed to be left behind, it was replaced, now renewables are on the path to replacing fossil fuel.
Including graphene-powered solar airplanes?
Dont know why you all have a sudden case of graphene-ophobia but it seems to have spread among you luddites pretty fast
Do you think this can be turned into graphene?
oh my, they used a "hydrocarbon",

http://www.k-state.edu/media/newsreleases/2017-01/graphenepatent12517.html

Physicists patent detonation technique to mass-produce graphene
Wednesday, Jan. 25, 2017
columbiaaccidentinvestigation
2017-02-23 20:42:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
On Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 9:05:46 AM UTC-8, Chom Noamsky wrote:""
more negative marketing, hey idiot the pipeline is a stupid idea
Tell that to the people who consume 100 million barrels per day around
the world.
Including you.
Im telling that to everybody you idiot, consuming old wood for fuel needed to be left behind, it was replaced, now renewables are on the path to replacing fossil fuel.
Including graphene-powered solar airplanes?
Dont know why you all have a sudden case of graphene-ophobia but it seems to have spread among you luddites pretty fast
Do you think this can be turned into graphene?
“Holey” Graphene for Energy Storage
Charged holes in graphene increase energy storage capacity
http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/pressrelease/holey_graphene_for_energy_storage
Chom Noamsky
2017-02-23 21:15:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
On Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 9:05:46 AM UTC-8, Chom Noamsky wrote:""
more negative marketing, hey idiot the pipeline is a stupid idea
Tell that to the people who consume 100 million barrels per day around
the world.
Including you.
Im telling that to everybody you idiot, consuming old wood for fuel needed to be left behind, it was replaced, now renewables are on the path to replacing fossil fuel.
Including graphene-powered solar airplanes?
Dont know why you all have a sudden case of graphene-ophobia but it seems to have spread among you luddites pretty fast
Do you think this can be turned into graphene?
“Holey” Graphene for Energy Storage
Charged holes in graphene increase energy storage capacity
http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/pressrelease/holey_graphene_for_energy_storage
So where's my graphene-battery EV?
columbiaaccidentinvestigation
2017-02-23 21:29:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
On Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 9:05:46 AM UTC-8, Chom Noamsky wrote:""
more negative marketing, hey idiot the pipeline is a stupid idea
Tell that to the people who consume 100 million barrels per day around
the world.
Including you.
Im telling that to everybody you idiot, consuming old wood for fuel needed to be left behind, it was replaced, now renewables are on the path to replacing fossil fuel.
Including graphene-powered solar airplanes?
Dont know why you all have a sudden case of graphene-ophobia but it seems to have spread among you luddites pretty fast
Do you think this can be turned into graphene?
“Holey” Graphene for Energy Storage
Charged holes in graphene increase energy storage capacity
http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/pressrelease/holey_graphene_for_energy_storage
So where's my graphene-battery EV?
gotta earn it, you have yet to do so
Chom Noamsky
2017-02-23 21:36:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
On Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 9:05:46 AM UTC-8, Chom Noamsky wrote:""
more negative marketing, hey idiot the pipeline is a stupid idea
Tell that to the people who consume 100 million barrels per day around
the world.
Including you.
Im telling that to everybody you idiot, consuming old wood for fuel needed to be left behind, it was replaced, now renewables are on the path to replacing fossil fuel.
Including graphene-powered solar airplanes?
Dont know why you all have a sudden case of graphene-ophobia but it seems to have spread among you luddites pretty fast
Do you think this can be turned into graphene?
“Holey” Graphene for Energy Storage
Charged holes in graphene increase energy storage capacity
http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/pressrelease/holey_graphene_for_energy_storage
So where's my graphene-battery EV?
gotta earn it, you have yet to do so
When I earn it, where do I go buy one?
columbiaaccidentinvestigation
2017-02-23 21:42:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
On Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 9:05:46 AM UTC-8, Chom Noamsky wrote:""
more negative marketing, hey idiot the pipeline is a stupid idea
Tell that to the people who consume 100 million barrels per day around
the world.
Including you.
Im telling that to everybody you idiot, consuming old wood for fuel needed to be left behind, it was replaced, now renewables are on the path to replacing fossil fuel.
Including graphene-powered solar airplanes?
Dont know why you all have a sudden case of graphene-ophobia but it seems to have spread among you luddites pretty fast
Do you think this can be turned into graphene?
“Holey” Graphene for Energy Storage
Charged holes in graphene increase energy storage capacity
http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/pressrelease/holey_graphene_for_energy_storage
So where's my graphene-battery EV?
gotta earn it, you have yet to do so
When I earn it, where do I go buy one?
You were all fired up about the future just 5 days ago, why the sudden flip flop to demanding something now? (what up with that?)

On Saturday, February 18, 2017 at 11:25:19 AM UTC-8, Chom Noamsky wrote:"...‘game changer’"
...the company behind it has claimed...If true...could allow."
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.global-warming/NRmk91T_ef0/8TxFAAvYDAAJ
Chom Noamsky
2017-02-23 21:58:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
On Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 9:05:46 AM UTC-8, Chom Noamsky wrote:""
more negative marketing, hey idiot the pipeline is a stupid idea
Tell that to the people who consume 100 million barrels per day around
the world.
Including you.
Im telling that to everybody you idiot, consuming old wood for fuel needed to be left behind, it was replaced, now renewables are on the path to replacing fossil fuel.
Including graphene-powered solar airplanes?
Dont know why you all have a sudden case of graphene-ophobia but it seems to have spread among you luddites pretty fast
Do you think this can be turned into graphene?
“Holey” Graphene for Energy Storage
Charged holes in graphene increase energy storage capacity
http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/pressrelease/holey_graphene_for_energy_storage
So where's my graphene-battery EV?
gotta earn it, you have yet to do so
When I earn it, where do I go buy one?
You were all fired up about the future just 5 days ago, why the sudden flip flop to demanding something now? (what up with that?)
On Saturday, February 18, 2017 at 11:25:19 AM UTC-8, Chom Noamsky wrote:"....‘game changer’"
....the company behind it has claimed...If true...could allow."
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.global-warming/NRmk91T_ef0/8TxFAAvYDAAJ
Changing the topic so soon? LOL!
columbiaaccidentinvestigation
2017-02-23 22:09:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
On Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 9:05:46 AM UTC-8, Chom Noamsky wrote:""
more negative marketing, hey idiot the pipeline is a stupid idea
Tell that to the people who consume 100 million barrels per day around
the world.
Including you.
Im telling that to everybody you idiot, consuming old wood for fuel needed to be left behind, it was replaced, now renewables are on the path to replacing fossil fuel.
Including graphene-powered solar airplanes?
Dont know why you all have a sudden case of graphene-ophobia but it seems to have spread among you luddites pretty fast
Do you think this can be turned into graphene?
“Holey” Graphene for Energy Storage
Charged holes in graphene increase energy storage capacity
http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/pressrelease/holey_graphene_for_energy_storage
So where's my graphene-battery EV?
gotta earn it, you have yet to do so
When I earn it, where do I go buy one?
You were all fired up about the future just 5 days ago, why the sudden flip flop to demanding something now? (what up with that?)
On Saturday, February 18, 2017 at 11:25:19 AM UTC-8, Chom Noamsky wrote:"....‘game changer’"
....the company behind it has claimed...If true...could allow."
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.global-warming/NRmk91T_ef0/8TxFAAvYDAAJ
Changing the topic so soon? LOL!
Correct me if im wrong, but your stupid attempt to humor was asking if you could purchase something now, with the implication that if its not here yet you have a place to mock it.

Now, just the other day you mentioned game changer, this implication is that you were mocking others because the future with bring about technology some may not like.

TO the point, your hypocrisy and constant negative branding would seem to rely on a fake pretense that nothing you say can be challenged contradicted or shown to be utter bs.

On top of that you have shown a dangerous propensity for ultimate denial of facts, as a means to insulate you from your perpetual generation of bs.

No need to reply, for at this point i would be talking to anybody who is taken in by your "hook" style headlines, and beyond that the few who would actually take your written words as being anything more than pathetic whining attempting to drive a negative branding label.
Chom Noamsky
2017-02-23 22:19:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
On Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 9:05:46 AM UTC-8, Chom Noamsky wrote:""
more negative marketing, hey idiot the pipeline is a stupid idea
Tell that to the people who consume 100 million barrels per day around
the world.
Including you.
Im telling that to everybody you idiot, consuming old wood for fuel needed to be left behind, it was replaced, now renewables are on the path to replacing fossil fuel.
Including graphene-powered solar airplanes?
Dont know why you all have a sudden case of graphene-ophobia but it seems to have spread among you luddites pretty fast
Do you think this can be turned into graphene?
“Holey” Graphene for Energy Storage
Charged holes in graphene increase energy storage capacity
http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/pressrelease/holey_graphene_for_energy_storage
So where's my graphene-battery EV?
gotta earn it, you have yet to do so
When I earn it, where do I go buy one?
You were all fired up about the future just 5 days ago, why the sudden flip flop to demanding something now? (what up with that?)
On Saturday, February 18, 2017 at 11:25:19 AM UTC-8, Chom Noamsky wrote:"....‘game changer’"
....the company behind it has claimed...If true...could allow."
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.global-warming/NRmk91T_ef0/8TxFAAvYDAAJ
Changing the topic so soon? LOL!
Correct me if im wrong, but your stupid attempt to humor was asking if you could purchase something now, with the implication that if its not here yet you have a place to mock it.
Now, just the other day you mentioned game changer, this implication is that you were mocking others because the future with bring about technology some may not like.
TO the point, your hypocrisy and constant negative branding would seem to rely on a fake pretense that nothing you say can be challenged contradicted or shown to be utter bs.
On top of that you have shown a dangerous propensity for ultimate denial of facts, as a means to insulate you from your perpetual generation of bs.
No need to reply, for at this point i would be talking to anybody who is taken in by your "hook" style headlines, and beyond that the few who would actually take your written words as being anything more than pathetic whining attempting to drive a negative branding label.
So... does that mean I still can't buy a graphene-battery EV?
columbiaaccidentinvestigation
2017-02-23 22:25:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
On Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 9:05:46 AM UTC-8, Chom Noamsky wrote:""
more negative marketing, hey idiot the pipeline is a stupid idea
Tell that to the people who consume 100 million barrels per day around
the world.
Including you.
Im telling that to everybody you idiot, consuming old wood for fuel needed to be left behind, it was replaced, now renewables are on the path to replacing fossil fuel.
Including graphene-powered solar airplanes?
Dont know why you all have a sudden case of graphene-ophobia but it seems to have spread among you luddites pretty fast
Do you think this can be turned into graphene?
“Holey” Graphene for Energy Storage
Charged holes in graphene increase energy storage capacity
http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/pressrelease/holey_graphene_for_energy_storage
So where's my graphene-battery EV?
gotta earn it, you have yet to do so
When I earn it, where do I go buy one?
You were all fired up about the future just 5 days ago, why the sudden flip flop to demanding something now? (what up with that?)
On Saturday, February 18, 2017 at 11:25:19 AM UTC-8, Chom Noamsky wrote:"....‘game changer’"
....the company behind it has claimed...If true...could allow."
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.global-warming/NRmk91T_ef0/8TxFAAvYDAAJ
Changing the topic so soon? LOL!
Correct me if im wrong, but your stupid attempt to humor was asking if you could purchase something now, with the implication that if its not here yet you have a place to mock it.
Now, just the other day you mentioned game changer, this implication is that you were mocking others because the future with bring about technology some may not like.
TO the point, your hypocrisy and constant negative branding would seem to rely on a fake pretense that nothing you say can be challenged contradicted or shown to be utter bs.
On top of that you have shown a dangerous propensity for ultimate denial of facts, as a means to insulate you from your perpetual generation of bs.
No need to reply, for at this point i would be talking to anybody who is taken in by your "hook" style headlines, and beyond that the few who would actually take your written words as being anything more than pathetic whining attempting to drive a negative branding label.
So... does that mean I still can't buy a graphene-battery EV?
you aint earned it yet, get off your ass and do something
Chom Noamsky
2017-02-23 23:14:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
On Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 9:05:46 AM UTC-8, Chom Noamsky wrote:""
more negative marketing, hey idiot the pipeline is a stupid idea
Tell that to the people who consume 100 million barrels per day around
the world.
Including you.
Im telling that to everybody you idiot, consuming old wood for fuel needed to be left behind, it was replaced, now renewables are on the path to replacing fossil fuel.
Including graphene-powered solar airplanes?
Dont know why you all have a sudden case of graphene-ophobia but it seems to have spread among you luddites pretty fast
Do you think this can be turned into graphene?
“Holey” Graphene for Energy Storage
Charged holes in graphene increase energy storage capacity
http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/pressrelease/holey_graphene_for_energy_storage
So where's my graphene-battery EV?
gotta earn it, you have yet to do so
When I earn it, where do I go buy one?
You were all fired up about the future just 5 days ago, why the sudden flip flop to demanding something now? (what up with that?)
On Saturday, February 18, 2017 at 11:25:19 AM UTC-8, Chom Noamsky wrote:"....‘game changer’"
....the company behind it has claimed...If true...could allow."
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.global-warming/NRmk91T_ef0/8TxFAAvYDAAJ
Changing the topic so soon? LOL!
Correct me if im wrong, but your stupid attempt to humor was asking if you could purchase something now, with the implication that if its not here yet you have a place to mock it.
Now, just the other day you mentioned game changer, this implication is that you were mocking others because the future with bring about technology some may not like.
TO the point, your hypocrisy and constant negative branding would seem to rely on a fake pretense that nothing you say can be challenged contradicted or shown to be utter bs.
On top of that you have shown a dangerous propensity for ultimate denial of facts, as a means to insulate you from your perpetual generation of bs..
No need to reply, for at this point i would be talking to anybody who is taken in by your "hook" style headlines, and beyond that the few who would actually take your written words as being anything more than pathetic whining attempting to drive a negative branding label.
So... does that mean I still can't buy a graphene-battery EV?
you aint earned it yet, get off your ass and do something
And what do I have to do to earn a graphene battery car?
columbiaaccidentinvestigation
2017-02-24 03:44:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
On Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 9:05:46 AM UTC-8, Chom Noamsky wrote:""
more negative marketing, hey idiot the pipeline is a stupid idea
Tell that to the people who consume 100 million barrels per day around
the world.
Including you.
Im telling that to everybody you idiot, consuming old wood for fuel needed to be left behind, it was replaced, now renewables are on the path to replacing fossil fuel.
Including graphene-powered solar airplanes?
Dont know why you all have a sudden case of graphene-ophobia but it seems to have spread among you luddites pretty fast
Do you think this can be turned into graphene?
“Holey” Graphene for Energy Storage
Charged holes in graphene increase energy storage capacity
http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/pressrelease/holey_graphene_for_energy_storage
So where's my graphene-battery EV?
gotta earn it, you have yet to do so
When I earn it, where do I go buy one?
You were all fired up about the future just 5 days ago, why the sudden flip flop to demanding something now? (what up with that?)
On Saturday, February 18, 2017 at 11:25:19 AM UTC-8, Chom Noamsky wrote:"....‘game changer’"
....the company behind it has claimed...If true...could allow."
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.global-warming/NRmk91T_ef0/8TxFAAvYDAAJ
Changing the topic so soon? LOL!
Correct me if im wrong, but your stupid attempt to humor was asking if you could purchase something now, with the implication that if its not here yet you have a place to mock it.
Now, just the other day you mentioned game changer, this implication is that you were mocking others because the future with bring about technology some may not like.
TO the point, your hypocrisy and constant negative branding would seem to rely on a fake pretense that nothing you say can be challenged contradicted or shown to be utter bs.
On top of that you have shown a dangerous propensity for ultimate denial of facts, as a means to insulate you from your perpetual generation of bs..
No need to reply, for at this point i would be talking to anybody who is taken in by your "hook" style headlines, and beyond that the few who would actually take your written words as being anything more than pathetic whining attempting to drive a negative branding label.
So... does that mean I still can't buy a graphene-battery EV?
you aint earned it yet, get off your ass and do something
And what do I have to do to earn a graphene battery car?
Take your negative marketing/branding and shove it up your ass, for starters.
Chom Noamsky
2017-02-24 03:47:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
On Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 9:05:46 AM UTC-8, Chom Noamsky wrote:""
more negative marketing, hey idiot the pipeline is a stupid idea
Tell that to the people who consume 100 million barrels per day around
the world.
Including you.
Im telling that to everybody you idiot, consuming old wood for fuel needed to be left behind, it was replaced, now renewables are on the path to replacing fossil fuel.
Including graphene-powered solar airplanes?
Dont know why you all have a sudden case of graphene-ophobia but it seems to have spread among you luddites pretty fast
Do you think this can be turned into graphene?
“Holey” Graphene for Energy Storage
Charged holes in graphene increase energy storage capacity
http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/pressrelease/holey_graphene_for_energy_storage
So where's my graphene-battery EV?
gotta earn it, you have yet to do so
When I earn it, where do I go buy one?
You were all fired up about the future just 5 days ago, why the sudden flip flop to demanding something now? (what up with that?)
On Saturday, February 18, 2017 at 11:25:19 AM UTC-8, Chom Noamsky wrote:"....‘game changer’"
....the company behind it has claimed...If true...could allow."
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.global-warming/NRmk91T_ef0/8TxFAAvYDAAJ
Changing the topic so soon? LOL!
Correct me if im wrong, but your stupid attempt to humor was asking if you could purchase something now, with the implication that if its not here yet you have a place to mock it.
Now, just the other day you mentioned game changer, this implication is that you were mocking others because the future with bring about technology some may not like.
TO the point, your hypocrisy and constant negative branding would seem to rely on a fake pretense that nothing you say can be challenged contradicted or shown to be utter bs.
On top of that you have shown a dangerous propensity for ultimate denial of facts, as a means to insulate you from your perpetual generation of bs..
No need to reply, for at this point i would be talking to anybody who is taken in by your "hook" style headlines, and beyond that the few who would actually take your written words as being anything more than pathetic whining attempting to drive a negative branding label.
So... does that mean I still can't buy a graphene-battery EV?
you aint earned it yet, get off your ass and do something
And what do I have to do to earn a graphene battery car?
Take your negative marketing/branding and shove it up your ass, for starters.
And assuming I do that, where do I find the store that sells graphene
battery cars?
columbiaaccidentinvestigation
2017-02-24 03:49:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
On Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 9:05:46 AM UTC-8, Chom Noamsky wrote:""
more negative marketing, hey idiot the pipeline is a stupid idea
Tell that to the people who consume 100 million barrels per day around
the world.
Including you.
Im telling that to everybody you idiot, consuming old wood for fuel needed to be left behind, it was replaced, now renewables are on the path to replacing fossil fuel.
Including graphene-powered solar airplanes?
Dont know why you all have a sudden case of graphene-ophobia but it seems to have spread among you luddites pretty fast
Do you think this can be turned into graphene?
“Holey” Graphene for Energy Storage
Charged holes in graphene increase energy storage capacity
http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/pressrelease/holey_graphene_for_energy_storage
So where's my graphene-battery EV?
gotta earn it, you have yet to do so
When I earn it, where do I go buy one?
You were all fired up about the future just 5 days ago, why the sudden flip flop to demanding something now? (what up with that?)
On Saturday, February 18, 2017 at 11:25:19 AM UTC-8, Chom Noamsky wrote:"....‘game changer’"
....the company behind it has claimed...If true...could allow."
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.global-warming/NRmk91T_ef0/8TxFAAvYDAAJ
Changing the topic so soon? LOL!
Correct me if im wrong, but your stupid attempt to humor was asking if you could purchase something now, with the implication that if its not here yet you have a place to mock it.
Now, just the other day you mentioned game changer, this implication is that you were mocking others because the future with bring about technology some may not like.
TO the point, your hypocrisy and constant negative branding would seem to rely on a fake pretense that nothing you say can be challenged contradicted or shown to be utter bs.
On top of that you have shown a dangerous propensity for ultimate denial of facts, as a means to insulate you from your perpetual generation of bs..
No need to reply, for at this point i would be talking to anybody who is taken in by your "hook" style headlines, and beyond that the few who would actually take your written words as being anything more than pathetic whining attempting to drive a negative branding label.
So... does that mean I still can't buy a graphene-battery EV?
you aint earned it yet, get off your ass and do something
And what do I have to do to earn a graphene battery car?
Take your negative marketing/branding and shove it up your ass, for starters.
And assuming I do that,
no need to get into a hypothetical, you only deal in facts correct?
Chom Noamsky
2017-02-24 05:01:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
On Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 9:05:46 AM UTC-8, Chom Noamsky wrote:""
more negative marketing, hey idiot the pipeline is a stupid idea
Tell that to the people who consume 100 million barrels per day around
the world.
Including you.
Im telling that to everybody you idiot, consuming old wood for fuel needed to be left behind, it was replaced, now renewables are on the path to replacing fossil fuel.
Including graphene-powered solar airplanes?
Dont know why you all have a sudden case of graphene-ophobia but it seems to have spread among you luddites pretty fast
Do you think this can be turned into graphene?
“Holey” Graphene for Energy Storage
Charged holes in graphene increase energy storage capacity
http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/pressrelease/holey_graphene_for_energy_storage
So where's my graphene-battery EV?
gotta earn it, you have yet to do so
When I earn it, where do I go buy one?
You were all fired up about the future just 5 days ago, why the sudden flip flop to demanding something now? (what up with that?)
On Saturday, February 18, 2017 at 11:25:19 AM UTC-8, Chom Noamsky wrote:"....‘game changer’"
....the company behind it has claimed...If true...could allow."
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.global-warming/NRmk91T_ef0/8TxFAAvYDAAJ
Changing the topic so soon? LOL!
Correct me if im wrong, but your stupid attempt to humor was asking if you could purchase something now, with the implication that if its not here yet you have a place to mock it.
Now, just the other day you mentioned game changer, this implication is that you were mocking others because the future with bring about technology some may not like.
TO the point, your hypocrisy and constant negative branding would seem to rely on a fake pretense that nothing you say can be challenged contradicted or shown to be utter bs.
On top of that you have shown a dangerous propensity for ultimate denial of facts, as a means to insulate you from your perpetual generation of bs..
No need to reply, for at this point i would be talking to anybody who is taken in by your "hook" style headlines, and beyond that the few who would actually take your written words as being anything more than pathetic whining attempting to drive a negative branding label.
So... does that mean I still can't buy a graphene-battery EV?
you aint earned it yet, get off your ass and do something
And what do I have to do to earn a graphene battery car?
Take your negative marketing/branding and shove it up your ass, for starters.
And assuming I do that,
no need to get into a hypothetical, you only deal in facts correct?
Wow, it sure is difficult to buy a graphene battery car... LOL!
columbiaaccidentinvestigation
2017-02-24 05:27:22 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
On Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 9:05:46 AM UTC-8, Chom Noamsky wrote:""
more negative marketing, hey idiot the pipeline is a stupid idea
Tell that to the people who consume 100 million barrels per day around
the world.
Including you.
Im telling that to everybody you idiot, consuming old wood for fuel needed to be left behind, it was replaced, now renewables are on the path to replacing fossil fuel.
Including graphene-powered solar airplanes?
Dont know why you all have a sudden case of graphene-ophobia but it seems to have spread among you luddites pretty fast
Do you think this can be turned into graphene?
“Holey” Graphene for Energy Storage
Charged holes in graphene increase energy storage capacity
http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/pressrelease/holey_graphene_for_energy_storage
So where's my graphene-battery EV?
gotta earn it, you have yet to do so
When I earn it, where do I go buy one?
You were all fired up about the future just 5 days ago, why the sudden flip flop to demanding something now? (what up with that?)
On Saturday, February 18, 2017 at 11:25:19 AM UTC-8, Chom Noamsky wrote:"....‘game changer’"
....the company behind it has claimed...If true...could allow."
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.global-warming/NRmk91T_ef0/8TxFAAvYDAAJ
Changing the topic so soon? LOL!
Correct me if im wrong, but your stupid attempt to humor was asking if you could purchase something now, with the implication that if its not here yet you have a place to mock it.
Now, just the other day you mentioned game changer, this implication is that you were mocking others because the future with bring about technology some may not like.
TO the point, your hypocrisy and constant negative branding would seem to rely on a fake pretense that nothing you say can be challenged contradicted or shown to be utter bs.
On top of that you have shown a dangerous propensity for ultimate denial of facts, as a means to insulate you from your perpetual generation of bs..
No need to reply, for at this point i would be talking to anybody who is taken in by your "hook" style headlines, and beyond that the few who would actually take your written words as being anything more than pathetic whining attempting to drive a negative branding label.
So... does that mean I still can't buy a graphene-battery EV?
you aint earned it yet, get off your ass and do something
And what do I have to do to earn a graphene battery car?
Take your negative marketing/branding and shove it up your ass, for starters.
And assuming I do that,
no need to get into a hypothetical, you only deal in facts correct?
Wow, it sure is difficult to buy a graphene battery car... LOL!
its sure not easy making a loser like you take responsibility for your own words, so when are you going to show you actually go off your ass and did something?
Wally W.
2017-02-24 05:46:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 21:27:22 -0800 (PST),
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
On Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 9:05:46 AM UTC-8, Chom Noamsky wrote:""
more negative marketing, hey idiot the pipeline is a stupid idea
Tell that to the people who consume 100 million barrels per day around
the world.
Including you.
Im telling that to everybody you idiot, consuming old wood for fuel needed to be left behind, it was replaced, now renewables are on the path to replacing fossil fuel.
Including graphene-powered solar airplanes?
Dont know why you all have a sudden case of graphene-ophobia but it seems to have spread among you luddites pretty fast
Do you think this can be turned into graphene?
“Holey” Graphene for Energy Storage
Charged holes in graphene increase energy storage capacity
http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/pressrelease/holey_graphene_for_energy_storage
So where's my graphene-battery EV?
gotta earn it, you have yet to do so
When I earn it, where do I go buy one?
You were all fired up about the future just 5 days ago, why the sudden flip flop to demanding something now? (what up with that?)
On Saturday, February 18, 2017 at 11:25:19 AM UTC-8, Chom Noamsky wrote:"....‘game changer’"
....the company behind it has claimed...If true...could allow."
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.global-warming/NRmk91T_ef0/8TxFAAvYDAAJ
Changing the topic so soon? LOL!
Correct me if im wrong, but your stupid attempt to humor was asking if you could purchase something now, with the implication that if its not here yet you have a place to mock it.
Now, just the other day you mentioned game changer, this implication is that you were mocking others because the future with bring about technology some may not like.
TO the point, your hypocrisy and constant negative branding would seem to rely on a fake pretense that nothing you say can be challenged contradicted or shown to be utter bs.
On top of that you have shown a dangerous propensity for ultimate denial of facts, as a means to insulate you from your perpetual generation of bs..
No need to reply, for at this point i would be talking to anybody who is taken in by your "hook" style headlines, and beyond that the few who would actually take your written words as being anything more than pathetic whining attempting to drive a negative branding label.
So... does that mean I still can't buy a graphene-battery EV?
you aint earned it yet, get off your ass and do something
And what do I have to do to earn a graphene battery car?
Take your negative marketing/branding and shove it up your ass, for starters.
And assuming I do that,
no need to get into a hypothetical, you only deal in facts correct?
Wow, it sure is difficult to buy a graphene battery car... LOL!
its sure not easy making a loser like you take responsibility for your own words, so when are you going to show you actually go off your ass and did something?
Here is where CAI was painted into a corner and has been evading
desperately ever since:

:On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 13:15:53 -0800, Chom Noamsky wrote:
:>On 2/23/2017 12:42 PM, columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote:
:>> “Holey” Graphene for Energy Storage
:>> Charged holes in graphene increase energy storage capacity
:>> http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/pressrelease/holey_graphene_for_energy_storage
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
So where's my graphene-battery EV?
How about it, CAI: can you admit that no graphene-battery EV is
available for purchase today?

What do you think would happen if you told the truth in response to
that question?

Since we all know the answer to the question, do you think others'
respect for you would go up or down if you made a statement that
agrees with reality?
columbiaaccidentinvestigation
2017-02-24 06:33:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Wally W.
On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 21:27:22 -0800 (PST),
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
On Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 9:05:46 AM UTC-8, Chom Noamsky wrote:""
more negative marketing, hey idiot the pipeline is a stupid idea
Tell that to the people who consume 100 million barrels per day around
the world.
Including you.
Im telling that to everybody you idiot, consuming old wood for fuel needed to be left behind, it was replaced, now renewables are on the path to replacing fossil fuel.
Including graphene-powered solar airplanes?
Dont know why you all have a sudden case of graphene-ophobia but it seems to have spread among you luddites pretty fast
Do you think this can be turned into graphene?
“Holey” Graphene for Energy Storage
Charged holes in graphene increase energy storage capacity
http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/pressrelease/holey_graphene_for_energy_storage
So where's my graphene-battery EV?
gotta earn it, you have yet to do so
When I earn it, where do I go buy one?
You were all fired up about the future just 5 days ago, why the sudden flip flop to demanding something now? (what up with that?)
On Saturday, February 18, 2017 at 11:25:19 AM UTC-8, Chom Noamsky wrote:"....‘game changer’"
....the company behind it has claimed...If true...could allow."
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.global-warming/NRmk91T_ef0/8TxFAAvYDAAJ
Changing the topic so soon? LOL!
Correct me if im wrong, but your stupid attempt to humor was asking if you could purchase something now, with the implication that if its not here yet you have a place to mock it.
Now, just the other day you mentioned game changer, this implication is that you were mocking others because the future with bring about technology some may not like.
TO the point, your hypocrisy and constant negative branding would seem to rely on a fake pretense that nothing you say can be challenged contradicted or shown to be utter bs.
On top of that you have shown a dangerous propensity for ultimate denial of facts, as a means to insulate you from your perpetual generation of bs..
No need to reply, for at this point i would be talking to anybody who is taken in by your "hook" style headlines, and beyond that the few who would actually take your written words as being anything more than pathetic whining attempting to drive a negative branding label.
So... does that mean I still can't buy a graphene-battery EV?
you aint earned it yet, get off your ass and do something
And what do I have to do to earn a graphene battery car?
Take your negative marketing/branding and shove it up your ass, for starters.
And assuming I do that,
no need to get into a hypothetical, you only deal in facts correct?
Wow, it sure is difficult to buy a graphene battery car... LOL!
its sure not easy making a loser like you take responsibility for your own words, so when are you going to show you actually go off your ass and did something?
Here is where CAI was painted into a corner and has been evading
Not really, hypocrisy on his part is not so much a corner, more a platform for me to call him out, you know...
Post by Wally W.
:>> “Holey” Graphene for Energy Storage
:>> Charged holes in graphene increase energy storage capacity
:>> http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/pressrelease/holey_graphene_for_energy_storage
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
So where's my graphene-battery EV?
How about it,
How about asking him where his new game changing power plant is located?
Post by Wally W.
CAI: can you admit that no graphene-battery EV is
available for purchase today?
Is his power plant producing energy?
Post by Wally W.
What do you think would happen if you told the truth in response to
that question?
What would happen if you actually held yourself up to the standards you do others, rather than the low bar you set for yourself?
Post by Wally W.
Since we all know the answer to the question, do you think others'
respect for you would go up or down if you made a statement that
agrees with reality?
Since you know you are a troll trying to cover for chomper hypocrisy, how about you sit down and shut up?
Wally W.
2017-02-23 23:46:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 14:09:39 -0800 (PST),
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Correct me if im wrong,
When was the last time you accepted correction from anyone here?
Catoni
2017-02-24 00:44:22 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
On Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 9:05:46 AM UTC-8, Chom Noamsky wrote:""
more negative marketing, hey idiot the pipeline is a stupid idea
Tell that to the people who consume 100 million barrels per day around
the world.
Including you.
Im telling that to everybody you idiot, consuming old wood for fuel needed to be left behind, it was replaced, now renewables are on the path to replacing fossil fuel.
Don't you get that the protestors don't really give a damn about the land or the pipe ? ? .... Are you truly that blind or stupid ? ?

Pathetic ! !
Catoni
2017-02-24 00:42:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Chom Noamsky
The protestors just lit the camp on fire and walked away, taking no
responsibility for cleaning up their own mess. How much of that wood
and other construction material could have been recycled? How about the
toxic fumes released in the fire? Oh silly you, we're water protectors,
not air protectors. And the worst thing is their irresponsible method
of disposal resulted in two unfortunate kids getting burned, one of them
badly.
***
Two children were burned, one of them severely, at the Dakota Access
camp evacuation Wednesday after remaining activists set fire to about 20
shelters and a vehicle in what was described as a departure ceremony.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/feb/22/dakota-access-protesters-set-20-fires-during-evacu/
The stupid thing is.... they were holding up a pipeline more than 1000 miles long..... because of a 1000 or so foot stretch they did not want built.
Chom Noamsky
2017-02-24 00:54:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Catoni
Post by Chom Noamsky
The protestors just lit the camp on fire and walked away, taking no
responsibility for cleaning up their own mess. How much of that wood
and other construction material could have been recycled? How about the
toxic fumes released in the fire? Oh silly you, we're water protectors,
not air protectors. And the worst thing is their irresponsible method
of disposal resulted in two unfortunate kids getting burned, one of them
badly.
***
Two children were burned, one of them severely, at the Dakota Access
camp evacuation Wednesday after remaining activists set fire to about 20
shelters and a vehicle in what was described as a departure ceremony.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/feb/22/dakota-access-protesters-set-20-fires-during-evacu/
The stupid thing is.... they were holding up a pipeline more than 1000 miles long..... because of a 1000 or so foot stretch they did not want built.
I listened to a protest organizer bragging about their "great success"
on radio the other day. Do you know what she was bragging about?
Holding up construction. That's right, delaying the project for a month
was a "great success" in their wild imaginations. It's so pathetic you
want to laugh, some of these people have over six months of their lives
invested at the camp. It's just another cost of doing business these
days, beating off the hippies and natives.
columbiaaccidentinvestigation
2017-02-24 03:53:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Catoni
Post by Chom Noamsky
The protestors just lit the camp on fire and walked away, taking no
responsibility for cleaning up their own mess. How much of that wood
and other construction material could have been recycled? How about the
toxic fumes released in the fire? Oh silly you, we're water protectors,
not air protectors. And the worst thing is their irresponsible method
of disposal resulted in two unfortunate kids getting burned, one of them
badly.
***
Two children were burned, one of them severely, at the Dakota Access
camp evacuation Wednesday after remaining activists set fire to about 20
shelters and a vehicle in what was described as a departure ceremony.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/feb/22/dakota-access-protesters-set-20-fires-during-evacu/
The stupid thing is.... they were holding up a pipeline more than 1000 miles long..... because of a 1000 or so foot stretch they did not want built.
Let me get this straight, you think the protest is stupid based on the magnitude of actions taken by a company with such huge resources?
Loading...