Discussion:
Shakedown: Children’s Marches Exposed as Component of Litigation Campaign
(too old to reply)
Chom Noamsky
2019-03-13 15:31:28 UTC
Permalink
The climate litigation industry has been a flop so far, so let's
indoctrinate the children and trot them out. Surely the courts will
think of the children... oh won't they think of the children?

***

Newly obtained public records reveal that the recent wave of private
“climate” litigation and state attorneys general (AGs) investigations
was not only laid out behind closed doors seven years ago at an infamous
2012 meeting in La Jolla, California. It turns out the attendees also
got very early word about the frenzied street theater of children’s
marches and school kids’ strikes now filling the streets, including this
week in the U.S.

http://climatelitigationwatch.org/genesis-of-a-shakedown-new-records-expose-childrens-marches-as-long-planned-component-of-litigation-campaign/
columbiaaccidentinvestigation
2019-03-13 15:56:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chom Noamsky
The climate litigation industry has been a flop so far, so let's
indoctrinate the children and trot them out. Surely the courts will
think of the children... oh won't they think of the children?
***
Newly obtained public records reveal that the recent wave of private
“climate” litigation and state attorneys general (AGs) investigations
was not only laid out behind closed doors seven years ago at an infamous
2012 meeting in La Jolla, California. It turns out the attendees also
got very early word about the frenzied street theater of children’s
marches and school kids’ strikes now filling the streets, including this
week in the U.S.
http://climatelitigationwatch.org/genesis-of-a-shakedown-new-records-expose-childrens-marches-as-long-planned-component-of-litigation-campaign/
So you are saying one side manipulated information and acted "not in good faith", no collusion has been proven, and your chief concern is the children.

Oh the irony, where the hell where you when adoption of russian russian was recently used as a political human shield?
Bret Cahill
2019-03-13 15:59:48 UTC
Permalink
Ain't plannin whut commies do?

Affer all, it ain't like deniers can eben plan a post that dont make 'em look iggorant.
R Kym Horsell
2019-03-13 16:13:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bret Cahill
Ain't plannin whut commies do?
Affer all, it ain't like deniers can eben plan a post that dont make 'em look iggorant.
You only need a sityashun that has more than one factor and they cain gets it.
E.g. "hot and wet".
--
#include <stdio.h>
main()
{
float s=1; // "soil moisture"
for (int y=0; y<100; y++) { //model 100y
float a = 1; // low agw
if (y>50) a = 2; // high agw
float t = .1; // avg temp
float w = .5; // avg wetness
if (y%2) w *= 2; // some years are wetter
if (y&4) t *= 2; // some years are hotter
w *= a; // agw make years hotter and wetter than otherwise
t *= a;
for (int m=0; m<12; m++) { //sim 21 m; 6 summer and 6 winter
if (m<6) {
s *= 1-t; //cool
s += w; //wet
}
else {
s *= 1-2*t; //hot
s += 0; //dry
}
printf("%s%d.%d %g%s\n",(m<6?"":"*"),y,m,s,(s< 0.2?"DROUGHT":""));
// agw makes more drought
// first 50 years 36 drought months
// 2nd 50 has 132 drought months
}
}
}
Chom Noamsky
2019-03-13 16:18:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bret Cahill
Ain't plannin whut commies do?
Affer all, it ain't like deniers can eben plan a post that dont make 'em look iggorant.
Red Commies discovered that they can't outsmart the market.

Now Green Commies are discovering that they can't outsmart the market.

Any questions?
Bret Cahill
2019-03-13 16:29:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by Bret Cahill
Ain't plannin whut commies do?
Affer all, it ain't like deniers can eben plan a post that dont make 'em look iggorant.
Red Commies discovered that they can't outsmart the market.
Now Green Commies are discovering that they can't outsmart the market.
'splains why tar goop is suckin away at Ottawa teat.
R Kym Horsell
2019-03-13 16:38:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by Bret Cahill
Ain't plannin whut commies do?
Affer all, it ain't like deniers can eben plan a post that dont make 'em look iggorant.
Red Commies discovered that they can't outsmart the market.
Now Green Commies are discovering that they can't outsmart the market.
'splains why tar goop is suckin away at Ottawa teat.
In eco 101 they called it an "inferior good" and evvyone would much
had ravva used butter if they coulds afford that.
--
Some glacier and icecap facts
- Glaciers store about 69% of the world's freshwater, and if all land
ice melted the seas would rise about 70 meters (about 230 feet).
- During the last ice age (when glaciers covered more land area than
today) the sea level was about 400 feet lower than it is today. At
that time, glaciers covered almost one-third of the land.
- During the last warm spell, 125,000 years ago, the seas were about
18 feet higher than they are today. About three million years ago
the seas could have been up to 165 feet higher.
- North America's longest glacier is the Bering Glacier in Alaska,
measuring 204 kilometers long.
- Glacial ice can be very old-in some Canadian Arctic icecaps, ice at
the base is over 100 000 years old.
- The land underneath parts of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet may be up
to 2.5 kilometers below sea level, due to the weight of the ice.
- Antarctic ice shelves may calve icebergs that are over 80 km long.
- The Kutiah Glacier in Pakistan holds the record for the fastest
glacial surge. In 1953, it raced more than 12 kilometers in 3
months, averaging about 112 meters per day.
- Glacial ice often appears blue when it has become very dense. Years
of compression gradually make the ice denser over time, forcing out
the tiny air pockets between crystals. When glacier ice becomes
extremely dense, the ice absorbs all other colors in the spectrum
and reflects primarily blue, which is what we see. When glacier ice
is white, that usually means that there are many tiny air bubbles
still in the ice.
-- http://water.usgs.gov/edu/earthglacier.html
Chom Noamsky
2019-03-13 20:18:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by Bret Cahill
Ain't plannin whut commies do?
Affer all, it ain't like deniers can eben plan a post that dont make 'em look iggorant.
Red Commies discovered that they can't outsmart the market.
Now Green Commies are discovering that they can't outsmart the market.
'splains why tar goop is suckin away at Ottawa teat.
I'm 100% fer ending subsidies and penalties to all energy industries.

Coal, oil, gas, wind, solar, biomass, biofuels, hydro, you name it.

The first industry to implode would be wind and solar, where revenues
are 90% subsidy in Ontario.

Yep, wean 'em all off the teat and let the market decide.

What then... mebbe one or two months before every breeze and sunshine
farm in the land goes tits up?
Bret Cahill
2019-03-13 20:23:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by Bret Cahill
Ain't plannin whut commies do?
Affer all, it ain't like deniers can eben plan a post that dont make 'em look iggorant.
Red Commies discovered that they can't outsmart the market.
Now Green Commies are discovering that they can't outsmart the market.
'splains why tar goop is suckin away at Ottawa teat.
I'm 100% fer ending subsidies and penalties to all energy industries.
Lets start wif the ones that have been on the teat the longest.
Chom Noamsky
2019-03-13 20:31:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by Bret Cahill
Ain't plannin whut commies do?
Affer all, it ain't like deniers can eben plan a post that dont make 'em look iggorant.
Red Commies discovered that they can't outsmart the market.
Now Green Commies are discovering that they can't outsmart the market.
'splains why tar goop is suckin away at Ottawa teat.
I'm 100% fer ending subsidies and penalties to all energy industries.
Lets start wif the ones that have been on the teat the longest.
Okay, I'm in! This means the western Canada goop industry will get back
at least $250 billion in interprovincial welfare paid to Quebec, Ontario
and the other loser "have not" provinces.
columbiaaccidentinvestigation
2019-03-13 21:04:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by Bret Cahill
Ain't plannin whut commies do?
Affer all, it ain't like deniers can eben plan a post that dont make 'em look iggorant.
Red Commies discovered that they can't outsmart the market.
Now Green Commies are discovering that they can't outsmart the market.
'splains why tar goop is suckin away at Ottawa teat.
I'm 100% fer ending subsidies and penalties to all energy industries.
The entire nuclear industry is subsidized, they are trying to figure out what the hell is at the bottom of fukishima placing the blame on others wont fly here. Heck even the trump administration is funding a push for "safer" fuel, which inherently means they know its a problem
Post by Chom Noamsky
Coal, oil, gas, wind, solar, biomass, biofuels, hydro, you name it.
The first industry to implode would be wind and solar, where revenues
are 90% subsidy in Ontario.
Yep, wean 'em all off the teat and let the market decide.
What then... mebbe one or two months before every breeze and sunshine
farm in the land goes tits up?
JTEM is Remarkably Flexible
2019-03-13 17:20:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chom Noamsky
Red Commies discovered that they can't outsmart the market.
It's good old fashioned propaganda, nothing more and nothing less.

If you look at it, it's a generational thing. The younger you are, the
more vulnerable your are to influence -- be it commercial
advertisement or government propaganda. The older, the wiser
and more jaded you are, the more immune you are.

"Youth is wasted on the young."




-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/183400835598
columbiaaccidentinvestigation
2019-03-13 17:27:28 UTC
Permalink
On Wednesday, March 13, 2019 at 10:20:24 AM UTC-7, JTEM is Remarkably Flexible wrote:" If you look at it, it's a generational thing. The younger you are, the
more vulnerable your are to influence -- be it commercial advertisement or government propaganda. The older, the wiser and more jaded you are, the more immune you are."


https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.global-warming/TwzZkh9h1TA/xOHY3KuAAQAJ
Re: The Conservation Animal: The Hellephant
On Thursday, February 28, 2019 at 1:46:41 PM UTC-8, JTEM is Remarkably Flexible wrote:" I want a Hellephant powered Dodge Challenger"


So your "wants" are based on you being immune to "influence" except when it comes to things you are manipulated to want, got it.....
Bret Cahill
2019-03-13 20:22:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by JTEM is Remarkably Flexible
The older, the wiser
Deniers tink it's wise to avoid consensus medical science?
Chom Noamsky
2019-03-13 20:55:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by JTEM is Remarkably Flexible
The older, the wiser
Deniers tink it's wise to avoid consensus medical science?
The rate of medical research getting contradicted, superseded or proven
wrong is about 18-50%, depending on who did the numbers.

Do loons think it's wise to believe science is immune to theory revision?
columbiaaccidentinvestigation
2019-03-13 21:20:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by JTEM is Remarkably Flexible
The older, the wiser
Deniers tink it's wise to avoid consensus medical science?
The rate of medical research getting contradicted, superseded or proven
wrong is about 18-50%, depending on who did the numbers.
Do loons think it's wise to believe science is immune to theory revision?
In the case of co2, science showing the warming has gotten more robust, on the other hand reporting of emissions of particles that cool the surface may not be so reliable (under reporting which causes a greater cooling effect, this of course would impact the rate of warming caused by the increasing co2 concentrations)
R Kym Horsell
2019-03-13 23:20:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by JTEM is Remarkably Flexible
The older, the wiser
Deniers tink it's wise to avoid consensus medical science?
The rate of medical research getting contradicted, superseded or proven
wrong is about 18-50%, depending on who did the numbers.
Do loons think it's wise to believe science is immune to theory revision?
LOL! Lemme know when they "revise science" and find a brick falls up when
dropped or the sun "achlee" rises in the west.

It stands to reason hillbillies that dont know the first thing about
science dont know what a scientific theory *is*.

It's essentially an compact representation of a whole heap of observations.
To be "revised" in any nontrivial way requires all those observations to
have been shown to be faulty.

The informal definition of a scientific theory is "a notion that is
too expensive to change".

So "modification" if very very rare.

What *does* happen is a theory that has been found to work for 100s of
years sometimes gets domain-limited after some key insight/observation.
The obvees example to people that achlee passed science in school is
Newtonian mechanics.

In the 17th cent Newton came up with simple laws of motion that codified
everything that had been seen for the previous 2000 years when things moved
or were pushed or bumped into each other.

When some patent clerk figured a geometric way to codify laws of motion
with respect to different observers Newtonian mechanics didn't
get "modified" -- it got limited to places where it was still a good
approximation of what had been copiously observed upto the 20th cent.
Slow with respect to the speed of light. (And various equivalences -- e.g.
low energy == low speed & low gravity fields == not near the
event horizone of a black hole).
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
In the case of co2, science showing the warming has gotten more robust, on the other hand reporting of emissions of particles that cool the surface may not be so reliable (under reporting which causes a greater cooling effect, this of course would impact the rate of warming caused by the increasing co2 concentrations)
--
[Who needs genetic tests:]
Post by columbiaaccidentinvestigation
Odd, my 9 teay old daughter is more intelligent than all of you alarmists put together.
If thats the case, she is probably not your daughter.
Odd, she came out of my wifes cunt after my dick was in it.
-- Matt Sykes, 3 Dec 2013.
gordo
2019-03-14 17:56:52 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 13:55:56 -0700, Chom Noamsky
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by JTEM is Remarkably Flexible
The older, the wiser
Deniers tink it's wise to avoid consensus medical science?
The rate of medical research getting contradicted, superseded or proven
wrong is about 18-50%, depending on who did the numbers.
Do loons think it's wise to believe science is immune to theory revision?
How the hell would you know what loons think?
"The Common Loon needs no
introduction to Canadian birders,
but despite this familiarity, we
keep being surprised as we study its basic
biology. Banding has allowed us to identify
individual loons. And by identifying
individuals, we have been able to learn
about the details of their social system and
begin to understand something of their
vocalizations."
https://www.bsc-eoc.org/download/BWCwi10.pdf

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
Chom Noamsky
2019-03-14 19:27:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by gordo
On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 13:55:56 -0700, Chom Noamsky
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by Bret Cahill
Post by JTEM is Remarkably Flexible
The older, the wiser
Deniers tink it's wise to avoid consensus medical science?
The rate of medical research getting contradicted, superseded or proven
wrong is about 18-50%, depending on who did the numbers.
Do loons think it's wise to believe science is immune to theory revision?
How the hell would you know what loons think?
"The Common Loon needs no
introduction to Canadian birders,
but despite this familiarity, we
keep being surprised as we study its basic
biology. Banding has allowed us to identify
individual loons. And by identifying
individuals, we have been able to learn
about the details of their social system and
begin to understand something of their
vocalizations."
https://www.bsc-eoc.org/download/BWCwi10.pdf
loon
----------------------------
NOUN
informal
A silly or foolish person.

https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/loon

Loading...