Discussion:
Gore got out of Vietnam after 4 1/2 months of a twelve month tour of duty
(too old to reply)
t***@gmail.com
2009-03-17 15:45:32 UTC
Permalink
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html

Gore got out of Vietnam after 4 1/2 months of a twelve month tour of
duty and out of the Army early on the excuse he was going to go to
Divinity School. In a couple months he flunked out but did not return
to fulfill his Army obligations.
t***@gmail.com
2009-03-17 15:54:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out of Vietnam after 4 1/2 months of a twelve month tour of
duty and out of the Army early on the excuse he was going to go to
Divinity School. In a couple months he flunked out but did not return
to fulfill his Army obligations.
"In two memos to Gore in late 1987 and early 1988, his press
secretary, and then his communications director, warned Gore that he
had developed a record for stretching the truth. ''Your main pitfall
is exaggeration,'' Arlie Schardt, the campaign's communications
director, warned Gore in March 1988. In September, 1987, Mike Kopp,
the campaign's press secretary, told Gore in another memo that his
image ''may continue to suffer if you continue to go out on a limb
with remarks that may be impossible to back up.'' In this regard, Al
Gore now claims he was a reporter for 7 years, although he used to
claim only five. Records reflect the lower number."
marcodbeast
2009-03-17 16:54:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore
Gore whine = k00kpost.
t***@gmail.com
2009-03-17 15:56:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out of Vietnam after 4 1/2 months of a twelve month tour of
duty and out of the Army early on the excuse he was going to go to
Divinity School. In a couple months he flunked out but did not return
to fulfill his Army obligations.
AL "UNABOMBER" GORE
WACKO ENVIRONMENTAL EXTREMIST
Al Gore wrote the book Earth in the Balance: Ecology and the Human
Spirit, which is the wacko socialist manifesto to regulate everything
based on junk science. He parroted the extremist EARTH FIRSTers
terrorist party line with a straight face. It is probably the most
ignorant book ever written about the environment. In it he wrote the
scary totalitarian prescription "we must make the rescue of the
environment the central organizing principle for civilization."

The following are highlights from a 1992 Democratic National Committee
(DNC) memo by Jonathan Sallet to the Clinton-Gore campaign that
highlighted Gore vulnerabilities from his extremist manifestoEarth in
the Balance. The memo was obtained by the Wall Street Journal, which
published it in August of 1992. Among the DNC's findings:

"Al is a radical environmentalist who wants to change the very fabric
of America."
"He (Gore) criticizes America for being America -- a place where
people enjoy the benefits of an advanced standard of living."
"He (Gore) has no sense of proportion: He equates the failure to
recycle aluminum cans with the Holocaust."
"He (Gore) believes that our civilization, itself, is evil (because it
is, in his words, 'addicted to the consumption of the earth.')"

Recently Gore was asked by Gannett News if his opinions have changed
since writing Earth in the Balance. Gore said:

"There is not a single passage in that book that I disagree with or
would change."

(Gannett News Service, 3/23/99)



Gore called the internal combustion engine the greatest enemy of
mankind, see -

Al Gore vs. the Automobile
Gore wrote in EARTH IN THE BALANCE pp 325-326, "It ought to be
possible to establish a coordinated global program to accomplish the
strategic goal of completely eliminating the internal combustion
engine (by government fiat) over, say, a 25 year period." "I wrote in
this book Earth in the Balance that we should set as a strategic goal
the phasing out of the internal-combustion engine over a 25-year
period. I accept now that was a mistake. Twenty-five years is far too
long for a goal like that. I think we can do it quicker." (Ramesh
Ponnuru, "The Attack Man," National Review, February 21, 2000)
marcodbeast
2009-03-17 16:55:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore
Gore whine = k00kpost.
marcodbeast
2009-03-17 16:54:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore
Gore whine = k00kpost.
e***@gmail.com
2009-03-17 18:42:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out of Vietnam after 4 1/2 months of a twelve month tour of
duty and out of the Army early on the excuse he was going to go to
Divinity School. In a couple months he flunked out but did not return
to fulfill his Army obligations.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/gorevietnam.asp
t***@gmail.com
2009-03-17 19:43:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by e***@gmail.com
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out of Vietnam after 4 1/2 months of a twelve month tour of
duty and out of the Army early on the excuse he was going to go to
Divinity School. In a couple months he flunked out but did not return
to fulfill his Army obligations.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/gorevietnam.asp
That confirms exactly what said, albeit in language a lot kinder to
the Goreacle. The fact is that he did not fulfil his tour in Vietnam.
He did not serve in a combat or in an even remotely useful role for
the war effort. The fact is he quit Vietnam to go to Divinity school,
which he also did not complete. Either he was incompetent in divinity
school or he went there to get out of Vietnam and only attended until
he could fail out or drop out.

The man is not a patriot. The man is a liar and a coward. He is NOT a
leader fo men. He is a leader of lying thieving fudging cherry-picking
pseudo-scientific alarmist activists. And he is getting rich off of it.
e***@gmail.com
2009-03-17 21:16:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by e***@gmail.com
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out of Vietnam after 4 1/2 months of a twelve month tour of
duty and out of the Army early on the excuse he was going to go to
Divinity School. In a couple months he flunked out but did not return
to fulfill his Army obligations.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/gorevietnam.asp
That confirms exactly what said, albeit in language a lot kinder to
the Goreacle. The fact is that he did not fulfil his tour in Vietnam.
He did not serve in a combat or in an even remotely useful role for
the war effort. The fact is he quit Vietnam to go to Divinity school,
which he also did not complete. Either he was incompetent in divinity
school or he went there to get out of Vietnam and only attended until
he could fail out or drop out.
It says it cut 2 months out, not the 7 as you claimed. His discharge
was per Army regulations, not any special treatment. And he had no
Army obligations after being discharged. So you made 3 false charges.

Further, "Gore attended Vanderbilt Divinity School on a yearlong
Rockefeller Foundation scholarship for people planning secular
careers; he had never intended to become a minister and later said
that "he had hoped to make sense of the social injustices that seemed
to challenge his religious beliefs."
Post by t***@gmail.com
The man is not a patriot. The man is a liar and a coward. He is NOT a
leader fo men. He is a leader of lying thieving fudging cherry-picking
pseudo-scientific alarmist activists. And he is getting rich off of it.
James
2009-03-18 03:08:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by e***@gmail.com
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out of Vietnam after 4 1/2 months of a twelve month tour of
duty and out of the Army early on the excuse he was going to go to
Divinity School. In a couple months he flunked out but did not return
to fulfill his Army obligations.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/gorevietnam.asp
That confirms exactly what said, albeit in language a lot kinder to
the Goreacle. The fact is that he did not fulfil his tour in Vietnam.
He did not serve in a combat or in an even remotely useful role for
the war effort. The fact is he quit Vietnam to go to Divinity school,
which he also did not complete. Either he was incompetent in divinity
school or he went there to get out of Vietnam and only attended until
he could fail out or drop out.

The man is not a patriot. The man is a liar and a coward. He is NOT a
leader fo men. He is a leader of lying thieving fudging cherry-picking
pseudo-scientific alarmist activists. And he is getting rich off of it.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
I thought he and Kerry talked about global warming on a secret mission
in Cambodia together.
Doug Reese
2009-03-18 13:19:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by e***@gmail.com
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out ofVietnamafter 4 1/2 months of a twelve month tour of
duty and out of the Army early on the excuse he was going to go to
Divinity School. In a couple months he flunked out but did not return
to fulfill his Army obligations.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/gorevietnam.asp
That confirms exactly what said, albeit in language a lot kinder to
the Goreacle. The fact is that he did not fulfil his tour inVietnam.
He did not serve in a combat
So what? The overwhelming majority of guys over there didn't serve in
a combat role.

He did the job to which he was assigned.

How about you?

I suspect you've watched a few too many war movies.

Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
or in an even remotely useful role for
the war effort. The fact is he quitVietnamto go to Divinity school,
which he also did not complete. Either he was incompetent in divinity
school or he went there to get out ofVietnamand only attended until
he could fail out or drop out.
The man is not a patriot. The man is a liar and a coward. He is NOT a
leader fo men. He is a leader of lying thieving fudging cherry-picking
pseudo-scientific alarmist activists. And he is getting rich off of it.
mrbawana2u
2009-03-18 13:43:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by e***@gmail.com
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out ofVietnamafter 4 1/2 months of a twelve month tour of
duty and out of the Army early on the excuse he was going to go to
Divinity School. In a couple months he flunked out but did not return
to fulfill his Army obligations.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/gorevietnam.asp
That confirms exactly what said, albeit in language a lot kinder to
the Goreacle. The fact is that he did not fulfil his tour inVietnam.
He did not serve in a combat
So what? The overwhelming majority of guys over there didn't serve in
a combat role.
Did overwhelming majority of guys serve their full tour?
Post by Doug Reese
He did the job to which he was assigned.
How do you know that?
Did you serve along side of him?
I suppose you can cite examples of gore's military journalism...

Or are you just running your mouth about things you know nothing
about?
Doug Reese
2009-03-18 14:15:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by e***@gmail.com
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out ofVietnamafter 4 1/2 months of a twelve month tour of
duty and out of the Army early on the excuse he was going to go to
Divinity School. In a couple months he flunked out but did not return
to fulfill his Army obligations.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/gorevietnam.asp
That confirms exactly what said, albeit in language a lot kinder to
the Goreacle. The fact is that he did not fulfil his tour inVietnam.
He did not serve in a combat
So what? The overwhelming majority of guys over there didn't serve in
a combat role.
Did overwhelming majority of guys serve their full tour?
I'd have to say most did. But there were quite a few who
left early for a variety of reasons. It was hardly unusual.

I left about a month early for school myself.
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by Doug Reese
He did the job to which he was assigned.
How do you know that?
Did you serve along side of him?
I don't have to. It's a matter of public record. Besides, if he
didn't, then the right-wing nutcases
would be telling us all about it.
Post by mrbawana2u
I suppose you can cite examples of gore's military journalism...
Why?
Post by mrbawana2u
Or are you just running your mouth about things you know nothing
about?
Nope . . . others here seem to have cornered that market.

Doug Reese
Post by mrbawana2u
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
mrbawana2u
2009-03-18 16:05:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Doug Reese
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by e***@gmail.com
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out ofVietnamafter 4 1/2 months of a twelve month tour of
duty and out of the Army early on the excuse he was going to go to
Divinity School. In a couple months he flunked out but did not return
to fulfill his Army obligations.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/gorevietnam.asp
That confirms exactly what said, albeit in language a lot kinder to
the Goreacle. The fact is that he did not fulfil his tour inVietnam.
He did not serve in a combat
So what? The overwhelming majority of guys over there didn't serve in
a combat role.
Did overwhelming majority of guys serve their full tour?
I'd have to say most did.
Reluctantly though, eh?
Post by Doug Reese
But there were quite a few who
left early for a variety of reasons. It was hardly unusual.
Leaving after 41/2 months "was hardly unusual"?
I find that hard to believe.
Post by Doug Reese
I left about a month early for school myself.
BFD.
Post by Doug Reese
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by Doug Reese
He did the job to which he was assigned.
How do you know that?
Did you serve along side of him?
I don't have to. It's a matter of public record.
That you can't cite...yeah...sure...
So, you make the statement "He did the job to which he was assigned"
but you have no idea if it's a true statement.
Typical lib-turd retard behavior.
BTW, what job was he assigned?
Post by Doug Reese
Besides, if he
didn't, then the right-wing nutcases
would be telling us all about it.
That's where you get your truth from?
I find that hard to believe...you sound like such a dumb ass.
Post by Doug Reese
Post by mrbawana2u
I suppose you can cite examples of gore's military journalism...
Why?
He was trained as a military journalist.
That doesn't mean he was assigned to do military journalism, does it?
What was the fraud assigned to do and do you have any proof he did
what he was assigned to do?
Or are you just running your mouth about things you know nothing
about?
That's typical lib-turd behavior. I think you have a bad case.
Post by Doug Reese
Post by mrbawana2u
Or are you just running your mouth about things you know nothing
about?
Nope . . . [...]
Your posts seem to affirm that INDEED you are just running your mouth
about things you know nothing about.
marcodbeast
2009-03-18 17:50:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by Doug Reese
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by e***@gmail.com
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out ofVietnamafter 4 1/2 months of a twelve month tour
of duty and out of the Army early on the excuse he was going to
go to Divinity School. In a couple months he flunked out but
did not return to fulfill his Army obligations.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/gorevietnam.asp
That confirms exactly what said, albeit in language a lot kinder
to the Goreacle. The fact is that he did not fulfil his tour
inVietnam. He did not serve in a combat
So what? The overwhelming majority of guys over there didn't serve
in a combat role.
Did overwhelming majority of guys serve their full tour?
I'd have to say most did.
Reluctantly though, eh?
Post by Doug Reese
But there were quite a few who
left early for a variety of reasons. It was hardly unusual.
Leaving after 41/2 months "was hardly unusual"?
I find that hard to believe.
Post by Doug Reese
I left about a month early for school myself.
BFD.
Post by Doug Reese
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by Doug Reese
He did the job to which he was assigned.
How do you know that?
Did you serve along side of him?
I don't have to. It's a matter of public record.
That you can't cite...yeah...sure...
So, you make the statement "He did the job to which he was assigned"
but you have no idea if it's a true statement.
Typical lib-turd retard behavior.
BTW, what job was he assigned?
Post by Doug Reese
Besides, if he
didn't, then the right-wing nutcases
would be telling us all about it.
That's where you get your truth from?
I find that hard to believe...you sound like such a dumb ass.
Post by Doug Reese
Post by mrbawana2u
I suppose you can cite examples of gore's military journalism...
Why?
He was trained as a military journalist.
That doesn't mean he was assigned to do military journalism, does it?
What was the fraud assigned to do and do you have any proof he did
what he was assigned to do?
Or are you just running your mouth about things you know nothing
about?
That's typical lib-turd behavior. I think you have a bad case.
Post by Doug Reese
Post by mrbawana2u
Or are you just running your mouth about things you know nothing
about?
Nope . . . [...]
Your posts seem to affirm that INDEED you are just running your mouth
about things you know nothing about.
Mr. bananas once again has zero information and a buttload of lies. lol
marcodbeast
2009-03-18 14:25:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by e***@gmail.com
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out ofVietnamafter 4 1/2 months of a twelve month tour of
duty and out of the Army early on the excuse he was going to go to
Divinity School. In a couple months he flunked out but did not
return to fulfill his Army obligations.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/gorevietnam.asp
That confirms exactly what said, albeit in language a lot kinder to
the Goreacle. The fact is that he did not fulfil his tour inVietnam.
He did not serve in a combat
So what? The overwhelming majority of guys over there didn't serve in
a combat role.
Did overwhelming majority of guys serve their full tour?
Post by Doug Reese
He did the job to which he was assigned.
How do you know that?
Did you serve along side of him?
I suppose you can cite examples of gore's military journalism...
Or are you just running your mouth about things you know nothing
about?
Projecting again, bananas? lol
t***@gmail.com
2009-03-18 14:42:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by e***@gmail.com
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out ofVietnamafter 4 1/2 months of a twelve month tour of
duty and out of the Army early on the excuse he was going to go to
Divinity School. In a couple months he flunked out but did not return
to fulfill his Army obligations.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/gorevietnam.asp
That confirms exactly what said, albeit in language a lot kinder to
the Goreacle. The fact is that he did not fulfil his tour inVietnam.
He did not serve in a combat
So what? The overwhelming majority of guys over there didn't serve in
a combat role.
Especially Senator's sons.....
Post by Doug Reese
He did the job to which he was assigned.
He was "assigned" that job because he was a Senators' son...
Post by Doug Reese
How about you?
Too young to serve in Vietnam. And irrelevant. The real question is
what about the rest of his fellow recruits. How many non-Senators'
sons got cushy office jobs with personal babysitters/body guards. Most
got to trudge thru the jungle while being shot at.
Post by Doug Reese
I suspect you've watched a few too many war movies.
I suspect that Gore got to watch the Vietnam war as an observer. He
might as well have watched it on a movie screen.
Post by Doug Reese
Doug Reese
Are you really that comfortable defending this unpatriotic coward?
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
or in an even remotely useful role for
the war effort. The fact is he quitVietnamto go to Divinity school,
which he also did not complete. Either he was incompetent in divinity
school or he went there to get out ofVietnamand only attended until
he could fail out or drop out.
The man is not a patriot. The man is a liar and a coward. He is NOT a
leader fo men. He is a leader of lying thieving fudging cherry-picking
pseudo-scientific alarmist activists. And he is getting rich off of it.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
marcodbeast
2009-03-18 17:51:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by e***@gmail.com
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out ofVietnamafter 4 1/2 months of a twelve month tour of
duty and out of the Army early on the excuse he was going to go to
Divinity School. In a couple months he flunked out but did not
return to fulfill his Army obligations.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/gorevietnam.asp
That confirms exactly what said, albeit in language a lot kinder to
the Goreacle. The fact is that he did not fulfil his tour inVietnam.
He did not serve in a combat
So what? The overwhelming majority of guys over there didn't serve in
a combat role.
Especially Senator's sons.....
Post by Doug Reese
He did the job to which he was assigned.
He was "assigned" that job because he was a Senators' son...
He should have been smarter, like Senator's son George Bush, who spent the
war bravely defending the continental US. lol
Doug Reese
2009-03-18 18:14:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by e***@gmail.com
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out ofVietnamafter 4 1/2 months of a twelve month tour of
duty and out of the Army early on the excuse he was going to go to
Divinity School. In a couple months he flunked out but did not return
to fulfill his Army obligations.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/gorevietnam.asp
That confirms exactly what said, albeit in language a lot kinder to
the Goreacle. The fact is that he did not fulfil his tour inVietnam.
He did not serve in a combat
So what? The overwhelming majority of guys over there didn't serve in
a combat role.
Especially Senator's sons.....
Post by Doug Reese
He did the job to which he was assigned.
He was "assigned" that job because he was a Senators' son...
Post by Doug Reese
How about you?
Too young to serve in Vietnam. And irrelevant. The real question is
what about the rest of his fellow recruits. How many non-Senators'
sons got cushy office jobs with personal babysitters/body guards. Most
got to trudge thru the jungle while being shot at.
You run your mouth, telling me I don't know what I'm talking about,
then come up with this blatantly false statement.

Most did NOT get to "trudge thru the jungle while being shot at".

That applied to roughly 10% of those of us over there. It is hardly
"most".
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
I suspect you've watched a few too many war movies.
I suspect that Gore got to watch the Vietnam war as an observer. He
might as well have watched it on a movie screen.
Post by Doug Reese
Doug Reese
Are you really that comfortable defending this unpatriotic coward?
He was neither.

Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
or in an even remotely useful role for
the war effort. The fact is he quitVietnamto go to Divinity school,
which he also did not complete. Either he was incompetent in divinity
school or he went there to get out ofVietnamand only attended until
he could fail out or drop out.
The man is not a patriot. The man is a liar and a coward. He is NOT a
leader fo men. He is a leader of lying thieving fudging cherry-picking
pseudo-scientific alarmist activists. And he is getting rich off of it.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
t***@gmail.com
2009-03-18 18:23:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by e***@gmail.com
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out ofVietnamafter 4 1/2 months of a twelve month tour of
duty and out of the Army early on the excuse he was going to go to
Divinity School. In a couple months he flunked out but did not return
to fulfill his Army obligations.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/gorevietnam.asp
That confirms exactly what said, albeit in language a lot kinder to
the Goreacle. The fact is that he did not fulfil his tour inVietnam.
He did not serve in a combat
So what? The overwhelming majority of guys over there didn't serve in
a combat role.
Especially Senator's sons.....
Post by Doug Reese
He did the job to which he was assigned.
He was "assigned" that job because he was a Senators' son...
Post by Doug Reese
How about you?
Too young to serve in Vietnam. And irrelevant. The real question is
what about the rest of his fellow recruits. How many non-Senators'
sons got cushy office jobs with personal babysitters/body guards. Most
got to trudge thru the jungle while being shot at.
You run your mouth, telling me I don't know what I'm talking about,
then come up with this blatantly false statement.
Fuck you.
Post by Doug Reese
Most did NOT get to "trudge thru the jungle while being shot at".
That applied to roughly 10% of those of us over there. It is hardly
"most".
Did you trudge thru the jungle getting shot at? Or did you sit on your
lazy arse the whole time like Gore did?
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
I suspect you've watched a few too many war movies.
I suspect that Gore got to watch the Vietnam war as an observer. He
might as well have watched it on a movie screen.
Post by Doug Reese
Doug Reese
Are you really that comfortable defending this unpatriotic coward?
He was neither.
Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
or in an even remotely useful role for
the war effort. The fact is he quitVietnamto go to Divinity school,
which he also did not complete. Either he was incompetent in divinity
school or he went there to get out ofVietnamand only attended until
he could fail out or drop out.
The man is not a patriot. The man is a liar and a coward. He is NOT a
leader fo men. He is a leader of lying thieving fudging cherry-picking
pseudo-scientific alarmist activists. And he is getting rich off of it.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Doug Reese
2009-03-18 18:39:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by e***@gmail.com
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out ofVietnamafter 4 1/2 months of a twelve month tour of
duty and out of the Army early on the excuse he was going to go to
Divinity School. In a couple months he flunked out but did not return
to fulfill his Army obligations.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/gorevietnam.asp
That confirms exactly what said, albeit in language a lot kinder to
the Goreacle. The fact is that he did not fulfil his tour inVietnam.
He did not serve in a combat
So what? The overwhelming majority of guys over there didn't serve in
a combat role.
Especially Senator's sons.....
Post by Doug Reese
He did the job to which he was assigned.
He was "assigned" that job because he was a Senators' son...
Post by Doug Reese
How about you?
Too young to serve in Vietnam. And irrelevant. The real question is
what about the rest of his fellow recruits. How many non-Senators'
sons got cushy office jobs with personal babysitters/body guards. Most
got to trudge thru the jungle while being shot at.
You run your mouth, telling me I don't know what I'm talking about,
then come up with this blatantly false statement.
Fuck you.
Truth hurts, doesn't it?
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
Most did NOT get to "trudge thru the jungle while being shot at".
That applied to roughly 10% of those of us over there. It is hardly
"most".
Did you trudge thru the jungle getting shot at?
I spent 17 months in a combat position.
Post by t***@gmail.com
Or did you sit on your
lazy arse the whole time like Gore did?
He went. I went. You didn't, but have the nerve to spout your lies.

I'm done with you and your ignorance.

But please feel free to continue to make an ass out of yourself.

Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
I suspect you've watched a few too many war movies.
I suspect that Gore got to watch the Vietnam war as an observer. He
might as well have watched it on a movie screen.
Post by Doug Reese
Doug Reese
Are you really that comfortable defending this unpatriotic coward?
He was neither.
Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
or in an even remotely useful role for
the war effort. The fact is he quitVietnamto go to Divinity school,
which he also did not complete. Either he was incompetent in divinity
school or he went there to get out ofVietnamand only attended until
he could fail out or drop out.
The man is not a patriot. The man is a liar and a coward. He is NOT a
leader fo men. He is a leader of lying thieving fudging cherry-picking
pseudo-scientific alarmist activists. And he is getting rich off of it.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
t***@gmail.com
2009-03-18 18:49:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by e***@gmail.com
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out ofVietnamafter 4 1/2 months of a twelve month tour of
duty and out of the Army early on the excuse he was going to go to
Divinity School. In a couple months he flunked out but did not return
to fulfill his Army obligations.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/gorevietnam.asp
That confirms exactly what said, albeit in language a lot kinder to
the Goreacle. The fact is that he did not fulfil his tour inVietnam.
He did not serve in a combat
So what? The overwhelming majority of guys over there didn't serve in
a combat role.
Especially Senator's sons.....
Post by Doug Reese
He did the job to which he was assigned.
He was "assigned" that job because he was a Senators' son...
Post by Doug Reese
How about you?
Too young to serve in Vietnam. And irrelevant. The real question is
what about the rest of his fellow recruits. How many non-Senators'
sons got cushy office jobs with personal babysitters/body guards. Most
got to trudge thru the jungle while being shot at.
You run your mouth, telling me I don't know what I'm talking about,
then come up with this blatantly false statement.
Fuck you.
Truth hurts, doesn't it?
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
Most did NOT get to "trudge thru the jungle while being shot at".
That applied to roughly 10% of those of us over there. It is hardly
"most".
Did you trudge thru the jungle getting shot at?
I spent 17 months in a combat position.
Post by t***@gmail.com
Or did you sit on your
lazy arse the whole time like Gore did?
He went. I went. You didn't, but have the nerve to spout your lies.
I'm done with you and your ignorance.
But please feel free to continue to make an ass out of yourself.
Doug Reese
You fought and he coasted on thru, no where near the front lines, with
a babysitter no less. And you defend him?

I've not spouted one goddamned lie. And you know it. What did I say
that was a lie?

You defend him and you call *me* ignorant.

At this point, I cannot believe that you fought in Vietnam. No way
would you feel this way if you fought in Vietnam. I didn't fight in
Vietnam and I'm appalled at the Senators' son cowardly treatment and
behavior.

You are either a liar or a fool.
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
I suspect you've watched a few too many war movies.
I suspect that Gore got to watch the Vietnam war as an observer. He
might as well have watched it on a movie screen.
Post by Doug Reese
Doug Reese
Are you really that comfortable defending this unpatriotic coward?
He was neither.
Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
or in an even remotely useful role for
the war effort. The fact is he quitVietnamto go to Divinity school,
which he also did not complete. Either he was incompetent in divinity
school or he went there to get out ofVietnamand only attended until
he could fail out or drop out.
The man is not a patriot. The man is a liar and a coward. He is NOT a
leader fo men. He is a leader of lying thieving fudging cherry-picking
pseudo-scientific alarmist activists. And he is getting rich off of it.- Hide quoted text -
Doug Reese
2009-03-18 18:57:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by e***@gmail.com
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out ofVietnamafter 4 1/2 months of a twelve month tour of
duty and out of the Army early on the excuse he was going to go to
Divinity School. In a couple months he flunked out but did not return
to fulfill his Army obligations.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/gorevietnam.asp
That confirms exactly what said, albeit in language a lot kinder to
the Goreacle. The fact is that he did not fulfil his tour inVietnam.
He did not serve in a combat
So what? The overwhelming majority of guys over there didn't serve in
a combat role.
Especially Senator's sons.....
Post by Doug Reese
He did the job to which he was assigned.
He was "assigned" that job because he was a Senators' son...
Post by Doug Reese
How about you?
Too young to serve in Vietnam. And irrelevant. The real question is
what about the rest of his fellow recruits. How many non-Senators'
sons got cushy office jobs with personal babysitters/body guards. Most
got to trudge thru the jungle while being shot at.
You run your mouth, telling me I don't know what I'm talking about,
then come up with this blatantly false statement.
Fuck you.
Truth hurts, doesn't it?
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
Most did NOT get to "trudge thru the jungle while being shot at".
That applied to roughly 10% of those of us over there. It is hardly
"most".
Did you trudge thru the jungle getting shot at?
I spent 17 months in a combat position.
Post by t***@gmail.com
Or did you sit on your
lazy arse the whole time like Gore did?
He went. I went. You didn't, but have the nerve to spout your lies.
I'm done with you and your ignorance.
But please feel free to continue to make an ass out of yourself.
Doug Reese
You fought and he coasted on thru, no where near the front lines, with
a babysitter no less. And you defend him?
I've not spouted one goddamned lie. And you know it. What did I say
that was a lie?
Since you asked . . . . "Most got to trudge thru the jungle while
being shot at."
Post by t***@gmail.com
You defend him and you call *me* ignorant.
Yep. I do, and you are.
Post by t***@gmail.com
At this point, I cannot believe that you fought in Vietnam. No way
would you feel this way if you fought in Vietnam. I didn't fight in
Vietnam and I'm appalled at the Senators' son cowardly treatment and
behavior.
You are either a liar or a fool.
My service is a matter of record -- very public record, actually.

I certainly don't need an internet punk such as yourself
to tell me what did, or did not happen in Vietnam.

Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
I suspect you've watched a few too many war movies.
I suspect that Gore got to watch the Vietnam war as an observer. He
might as well have watched it on a movie screen.
Post by Doug Reese
Doug Reese
Are you really that comfortable defending this unpatriotic coward?
He was neither.
Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
or in an even remotely useful role for
the war effort. The fact is he quitVietnamto go to Divinity school,
which he also did not complete. Either he was incompetent in divinity
school or he went there to get out ofVietnamand only attended until
he could fail out or drop out.
The man is not a patriot. The man is a liar and a coward. He is NOT a
leader fo men. He is a leader of lying thieving fudging cherry-picking
pseudo-scientific alarmist activists. And he is getting rich off of it.- Hide quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
t***@gmail.com
2009-03-18 19:29:31 UTC
Permalink
. You didn't, but have the nerve to spout your lies.
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
I'm done with you and your ignorance.
But please feel free to continue to make an ass out of yourself.
Doug Reese
You fought and he coasted on thru, no where near the front lines, with
a babysitter no less. And you defend him?
I've not spouted one goddamned lie. And you know it. What did I say
that was a lie?
Since you asked . . . .  "Most got to trudge thru the jungle while
being shot at."
Semantics. I thougfht you were done with me?
Post by t***@gmail.com
You defend him and you call *me* ignorant.
Yep. I do, and you are.
Defending the indefensible. Sounds like agw, Al Gore's military record
and your integrity.
Post by t***@gmail.com
At this point, I cannot believe that you fought in Vietnam. No way
would you feel this way if you fought in Vietnam. I didn't fight in
Vietnam and I'm appalled at the Senators' son cowardly treatment and
behavior.
You are either a liar or a fool.
My service is a matter of record -- very public record, actually.
Proof? Link? Anything? Didn't think so.
I certainly don't need an internet punk such as yourself
to tell me what did, or did not happen in Vietnam.
Doug Reese
I think you do.
marcodbeast
2009-03-18 20:44:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Doug Reese
. You didn't, but have the nerve to spout your lies.
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
I'm done with you and your ignorance.
But please feel free to continue to make an ass out of yourself.
Doug Reese
You fought and he coasted on thru, no where near the front lines,
with a babysitter no less. And you defend him?
I've not spouted one goddamned lie. And you know it. What did I say
that was a lie?
Since you asked . . . . "Most got to trudge thru the jungle while
being shot at."
Semantics. I thougfht you were done with me?
Another lie. If you had, you would not have asked the question. lol
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
You defend him and you call *me* ignorant.
Yep. I do, and you are.
Defending the indefensible. Sounds like agw, Al Gore's military record
and your integrity.
More lies. Surprise! lol
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
At this point, I cannot believe that you fought in Vietnam. No way
would you feel this way if you fought in Vietnam. I didn't fight in
Vietnam and I'm appalled at the Senators' son cowardly treatment and
behavior.
You are either a liar or a fool.
My service is a matter of record -- very public record, actually.
Proof? Link? Anything? Didn't think so.
Your inability to do research is your own problem, sad sick serial liar.
lol
Doug Reese
2009-03-19 16:54:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Doug Reese
. You didn't, but have the nerve to spout your lies.
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
I'm done with you and your ignorance.
But please feel free to continue to make an ass out of yourself.
Doug Reese
You fought and he coasted on thru, no where near the front lines, with
a babysitter no less. And you defend him?
I've not spouted one goddamned lie. And you know it. What did I say
that was a lie?
Since you asked . . . .  "Most got to trudge thru the jungle while
being shot at."
Semantics. I thougfht you were done with me?
Greetings from Can Tho. I was in Hoi An when this "conversation"
began, but have moved on.
I know you haven't a clue where those places are, and I know you don't
seem to have the ability to do
even the most basic search. . . . . . so I guess you'll just have to
wonder . . . .

Anyway, you asked a question, so I answered. It is hardly semantics,
however. It is a bald faced lie.

The fact is, a minority of those of us who were in Vietnam trudged
thru the jungle.
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
You defend him and you call *me* ignorant.
Yep. I do, and you are.
Defending the indefensible. Sounds like agw, Al Gore's military record
and your integrity.
Post by t***@gmail.com
At this point, I cannot believe that you fought in Vietnam. No way
would you feel this way if you fought in Vietnam. I didn't fight in
Vietnam and I'm appalled at the Senators' son cowardly treatment and
behavior.
You are either a liar or a fool.
My service is a matter of record -- very public record, actually.
Proof? Link? Anything? Didn't think so.
Again, a basic search would show you.

Try "Unfit for Command" . . . several references between pages 80-85.
Post by Doug Reese
I certainly don't need an internet punk such as yourself
to tell me what did, or did not happen in Vietnam.
Doug Reese
I think you do.
Now THAT is funny.

Doug Reese
t***@gmail.com
2009-03-20 13:51:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Doug Reese
Post by Doug Reese
. You didn't, but have the nerve to spout your lies.
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
I'm done with you and your ignorance.
But please feel free to continue to make an ass out of yourself.
Doug Reese
You fought and he coasted on thru, no where near the front lines, with
a babysitter no less. And you defend him?
I've not spouted one goddamned lie. And you know it. What did I say
that was a lie?
Since you asked . . . .  "Most got to trudge thru the jungle while
being shot at."
Semantics. I thougfht you were done with me?
Greetings from Can Tho. I was in Hoi An when this "conversation"
began, but have moved on.
I know you haven't a clue where those places are, and I know you don't
seem to have the ability to do
even the most basic search. . . . . . so I guess you'll just have to
wonder . . . .
Anyway, you asked a question, so I answered. It is hardly semantics,
however. It is a bald faced lie.
The fact is, a minority of those of us who were in Vietnam trudged
thru the jungle.
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
You defend him and you call *me* ignorant.
Yep. I do, and you are.
Defending the indefensible. Sounds like agw, Al Gore's military record
and your integrity.
Post by t***@gmail.com
At this point, I cannot believe that you fought in Vietnam. No way
would you feel this way if you fought in Vietnam. I didn't fight in
Vietnam and I'm appalled at the Senators' son cowardly treatment and
behavior.
You are either a liar or a fool.
My service is a matter of record -- very public record, actually.
Proof? Link? Anything? Didn't think so.
Again, a basic search would show you.
Try "Unfit for Command" . . . several references between pages 80-85.
Post by Doug Reese
I certainly don't need an internet punk such as yourself
to tell me what did, or did not happen in Vietnam.
Doug Reese
I think you do.
Now THAT is funny.
All I know is that when Canadians go to war or engage in police
actions or peace keeping, the majority of the people involved in the
operation get their boots dirty. Certainly more than 10% of them. I
guess we don't have as many Senators' sons and babysitters as the US.
Doug Reese
2009-03-20 18:06:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
Post by Doug Reese
. You didn't, but have the nerve to spout your lies.
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
I'm done with you and your ignorance.
But please feel free to continue to make an ass out of yourself.
Doug Reese
You fought and he coasted on thru, no where near the front lines, with
a babysitter no less. And you defend him?
I've not spouted one goddamned lie. And you know it. What did I say
that was a lie?
Since you asked . . . .  "Most got to trudge thru the jungle while
being shot at."
Semantics. I thougfht you were done with me?
Greetings from Can Tho. I was in Hoi An when this "conversation"
began, but have moved on.
I know you haven't a clue where those places are, and I know you don't
seem to have the ability to do
even the most basic search. . . . . . so I guess you'll just have to
wonder . . . .
Anyway, you asked a question, so I answered. It is hardly semantics,
however. It is a bald faced lie.
The fact is, a minority of those of us who were in Vietnam trudged
thru the jungle.
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
You defend him and you call *me* ignorant.
Yep. I do, and you are.
Defending the indefensible. Sounds like agw, Al Gore's military record
and your integrity.
Post by t***@gmail.com
At this point, I cannot believe that you fought in Vietnam. No way
would you feel this way if you fought in Vietnam. I didn't fight in
Vietnam and I'm appalled at the Senators' son cowardly treatment and
behavior.
You are either a liar or a fool.
My service is a matter of record -- very public record, actually.
Proof? Link? Anything? Didn't think so.
Again, a basic search would show you.
Try "Unfit for Command" . . . several references between pages 80-85.
Post by Doug Reese
I certainly don't need an internet punk such as yourself
to tell me what did, or did not happen in Vietnam.
Doug Reese
I think you do.
Now THAT is funny.
All I know is that when Canadians go to war or engage in police
actions or peace keeping, the majority of the people involved in the
operation get their boots dirty.
This was an American operation. It was in the 60's.

My percentage is accurate.

Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Certainly more than 10% of them. I
guess we don't have as many Senators' sons and babysitters as the US.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
mrbawana2u
2009-03-20 20:38:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by e***@gmail.com
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out ofVietnamafter 4 1/2 months of a twelve month tour of
duty and out of the Army early on the excuse he was going to go to
Divinity School. In a couple months he flunked out but did not return
to fulfill his Army obligations.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/gorevietnam.asp
That confirms exactly what said, albeit in language a lot kinder to
the Goreacle. The fact is that he did not fulfil his tour inVietnam.
He did not serve in a combat
So what? The overwhelming majority of guys over there didn't serve in
a combat role.
Especially Senator's sons.....
Post by Doug Reese
He did the job to which he was assigned.
He was "assigned" that job because he was a Senators' son...
Post by Doug Reese
How about you?
Too young to serve in Vietnam. And irrelevant. The real question is
what about the rest of his fellow recruits. How many non-Senators'
sons got cushy office jobs with personal babysitters/body guards. Most
got to trudge thru the jungle while being shot at.
You run your mouth, telling me I don't know what I'm talking about,
then come up with this blatantly false statement.
Fuck you.
Truth hurts, doesn't it?
You must be in constant pain. Boug.
Doug Reese
2009-03-20 22:52:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by e***@gmail.com
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out ofVietnamafter 4 1/2 months of a twelve month tour of
duty and out of the Army early on the excuse he was going to go to
Divinity School. In a couple months he flunked out but did not return
to fulfill his Army obligations.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/gorevietnam.asp
That confirms exactly what said, albeit in language a lot kinder to
the Goreacle. The fact is that he did not fulfil his tour inVietnam.
He did not serve in a combat
So what? The overwhelming majority of guys over there didn't serve in
a combat role.
Especially Senator's sons.....
Post by Doug Reese
He did the job to which he was assigned.
He was "assigned" that job because he was a Senators' son...
Post by Doug Reese
How about you?
Too young to serve in Vietnam. And irrelevant. The real question is
what about the rest of his fellow recruits. How many non-Senators'
sons got cushy office jobs with personal babysitters/body guards. Most
got to trudge thru the jungle while being shot at.
You run your mouth, telling me I don't know what I'm talking about,
then come up with this blatantly false statement.
Fuck you.
Truth hurts, doesn't it?
You must be in constant pain. Boug.
Nope.

Doug Reese
Post by mrbawana2u
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
mrbawana2u
2009-03-21 02:12:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by e***@gmail.com
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out ofVietnamafter 4 1/2 months of a twelve month tour of
duty and out of the Army early on the excuse he was going to go to
Divinity School. In a couple months he flunked out but did not return
to fulfill his Army obligations.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/gorevietnam.asp
That confirms exactly what said, albeit in language a lot kinder to
the Goreacle. The fact is that he did not fulfil his tour inVietnam.
He did not serve in a combat
So what? The overwhelming majority of guys over there didn't serve in
a combat role.
Especially Senator's sons.....
Post by Doug Reese
He did the job to which he was assigned.
He was "assigned" that job because he was a Senators' son...
Post by Doug Reese
How about you?
Too young to serve in Vietnam. And irrelevant. The real question is
what about the rest of his fellow recruits. How many non-Senators'
sons got cushy office jobs with personal babysitters/body guards. Most
got to trudge thru the jungle while being shot at.
You run your mouth, telling me I don't know what I'm talking about,
then come up with this blatantly false statement.
Fuck you.
Truth hurts, doesn't it?
You must be in constant pain. Boug.
Nope.
Of course. My bad.
You lib-turd retards don't have the capacity to recognize truth.
Ignorance is like crack to you lib-turd retards.

Tell us more about how Alpha Gore's 41/2 month Viet Nam tour wasn't
that unusual.

e***@gmail.com
2009-03-18 21:09:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by e***@gmail.com
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out ofVietnamafter 4 1/2 months of a twelve month tour of
duty and out of the Army early on the excuse he was going to go to
Divinity School. In a couple months he flunked out but did not return
to fulfill his Army obligations.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/gorevietnam.asp
That confirms exactly what said, albeit in language a lot kinder to
the Goreacle. The fact is that he did not fulfil his tour inVietnam.
He did not serve in a combat
So what? The overwhelming majority of guys over there didn't serve in
a combat role.
Especially Senator's sons.....
Post by Doug Reese
He did the job to which he was assigned.
He was "assigned" that job because he was a Senators' son...
False.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/gorevietnam.asp
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
How about you?
Too young to serve in Vietnam. And irrelevant. The real question is
what about the rest of his fellow recruits. How many non-Senators'
sons got cushy office jobs with personal babysitters/body guards. Most
got to trudge thru the jungle while being shot at.
Actually, no. Enlistees often got choices draftees did not.
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
I suspect you've watched a few too many war movies.
I suspect that Gore got to watch the Vietnam war as an observer. He
might as well have watched it on a movie screen.
Post by Doug Reese
Doug Reese
Are you really that comfortable defending this unpatriotic coward?
Are you comfortable with your hatred for a Vietnam veteran?
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
or in an even remotely useful role for
the war effort. The fact is he quitVietnamto go to Divinity school,
which he also did not complete. Either he was incompetent in divinity
school or he went there to get out ofVietnamand only attended until
he could fail out or drop out.
The man is not a patriot. The man is a liar and a coward. He is NOT a
leader fo men. He is a leader of lying thieving fudging cherry-picking
pseudo-scientific alarmist activists. And he is getting rich off of it.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
t***@gmail.com
2009-03-20 13:59:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by e***@gmail.com
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out ofVietnamafter 4 1/2 months of a twelve month tour of
duty and out of the Army early on the excuse he was going to go to
Divinity School. In a couple months he flunked out but did not return
to fulfill his Army obligations.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/gorevietnam.asp
That confirms exactly what said, albeit in language a lot kinder to
the Goreacle. The fact is that he did not fulfil his tour inVietnam.
He did not serve in a combat
So what? The overwhelming majority of guys over there didn't serve in
a combat role.
Especially Senator's sons.....
Post by Doug Reese
He did the job to which he was assigned.
He was "assigned" that job because he was a Senators' son...
False.http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/gorevietnam.asp
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
How about you?
Too young to serve in Vietnam. And irrelevant. The real question is
what about the rest of his fellow recruits. How many non-Senators'
sons got cushy office jobs with personal babysitters/body guards. Most
got to trudge thru the jungle while being shot at.
Actually, no.  Enlistees often got choices draftees did not.
So all enlistees got cushy jobs with babysitters to watch over them?
Fucking get real moron.
Post by t***@gmail.com
Post by Doug Reese
I suspect you've watched a few too many war movies.
I suspect that Gore got to watch the Vietnam war as an observer. He
might as well have watched it on a movie screen.
Post by Doug Reese
Doug Reese
Are you really that comfortable defending this unpatriotic coward?
Are you comfortable with your hatred for a Vietnam veteran?
Hatred? Where the hell do you get that from?

Al Gore is not a war veteran. He's is a Senator's son who got a pass
and was able to tour some parts of Vietnam like a tourist would, with
a babysitter no less, while a good number of his fellow Americans were
fighting it out with real weapons against a real deadly enemy in a
real war.

Al Gore is a veteran in the same sense that he is an environmentalist.
He goes thru the motions but he really personally, on the ground, does
not do anything actually useful to the cause.
Roger Coppock
2009-03-17 21:00:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out of Vietnam after 4 1/2 months [ . . . ]
Which is demonstration of wisdom,
the rest of the country remained
mired in Vietnam much longer.
mrbawana2u
2009-03-18 13:32:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Roger Coppock
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out of Vietnam after 4 1/2 months [ . . . ]
Which is demonstration of wisdom,
To lib-turd retards cowardliness=wisdom.
The demonkrap party is full of cowards.
Post by Roger Coppock
the rest of the country remained
mired in Vietnam much longer.
Demonkraps started the war.
Demonkraps lost the war.
marcodbeast
2009-03-18 14:26:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by Roger Coppock
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out of Vietnam after 4 1/2 months [ . . . ]
Which is demonstration of wisdom,
To lib-turd retards cowardliness=wisdom.
The demonkrap party is full of cowards.
Post by Roger Coppock
the rest of the country remained
mired in Vietnam much longer.
Demonkraps started the war.
Demonkraps lost the war.
k00k-a-d00dle-d000!
mrbawana2u
2009-03-18 16:06:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by Roger Coppock
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out of Vietnam after 4 1/2 months [ . . . ]
Which is demonstration of wisdom,
To lib-turd retards cowardliness=wisdom.
The demonkrap party is full of cowards.
Post by Roger Coppock
the rest of the country remained
mired in Vietnam much longer.
Demonkraps started the war.
Demonkraps lost the war.
[...]
Historically accurate.
marcodbeast
2009-03-18 17:52:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by Roger Coppock
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out of Vietnam after 4 1/2 months [ . . . ]
Which is demonstration of wisdom,
To lib-turd retards cowardliness=wisdom.
The demonkrap party is full of cowards.
Post by Roger Coppock
the rest of the country remained
mired in Vietnam much longer.
Demonkraps started the war.
Demonkraps lost the war.
[...]
Historically accurate.
Cite, please.

Oh, I forgot - you never have anything but your own drool. lol
mrbawana2u
2009-03-19 01:58:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by Roger Coppock
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out of Vietnam after 4 1/2 months [ . . . ]
Which is demonstration of wisdom,
To lib-turd retards cowardliness=wisdom.
The demonkrap party is full of cowards.
Post by Roger Coppock
the rest of the country remained
mired in Vietnam much longer.
Demonkraps started the war.
Demonkraps lost the war.
[...]
Historically accurate.
  Cite, please.
Our involvement goes back to the 1950's,
but the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, 1964, which authorized the use of
force (up until then, we were 'advisers') was under LBJ demonkrap.
It was a war fought under terms that would not permit victory. So we
simply gave up trying to win. Demonkrap strategy.
Does that strategy sound familiar, ass eater?
marcodbeast
2009-03-19 15:20:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by marcodbeast
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by Roger Coppock
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out of Vietnam after 4 1/2 months [ . . . ]
Which is demonstration of wisdom,
To lib-turd retards cowardliness=wisdom.
The demonkrap party is full of cowards.
Post by Roger Coppock
the rest of the country remained
mired in Vietnam much longer.
Demonkraps started the war.
Demonkraps lost the war.
[...]
Historically accurate.
Cite, please.
Our involvement goes back to the 1950's,
but the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, 1964, which authorized the use of
force (up until then, we were 'advisers') was under LBJ demonkrap.
It was a war fought under terms that would not permit victory. So we
simply gave up trying to win. Demonkrap strategy.
Does that strategy sound familiar, ass eater?
Now we see why you snipped "Oh, I forgot - you never have anything but
your own drool. lol "

Because all you have is made-up crazyassed right wing crap, as always.
lol
mrbawana2u
2009-03-19 16:57:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by marcodbeast
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by Roger Coppock
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out of Vietnam after 4 1/2 months [ . . . ]
Which is demonstration of wisdom,
To lib-turd retards cowardliness=wisdom.
The demonkrap party is full of cowards.
Post by Roger Coppock
the rest of the country remained
mired in Vietnam much longer.
Demonkraps started the war.
Demonkraps lost the war.
[...]
Historically accurate.
Cite, please.
Our involvement goes back to the 1950's,
but the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, 1964, which authorized the use of
force (up until then, we were 'advisers') was under LBJ demonkrap.
It was a war fought under terms that would not permit victory. So we
simply gave up trying to win. Demonkrap strategy.
Does that strategy sound familiar, ass eater?
  Now we see why [flushed]
I flush your delusions.
As usual, ass eater got nothing.
e***@gmail.com
2009-03-19 15:36:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by Roger Coppock
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out of Vietnam after 4 1/2 months [ . . . ]
Which is demonstration of wisdom,
To lib-turd retards cowardliness=wisdom.
The demonkrap party is full of cowards.
Post by Roger Coppock
the rest of the country remained
mired in Vietnam much longer.
Demonkraps started the war.
Demonkraps lost the war.
[...]
Historically accurate.
  Cite, please.
Our involvement goes back to the 1950's,
but the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, 1964, which authorized the use of
force (up until then, we were 'advisers') was under LBJ demonkrap.
It was a war fought under terms that would not permit victory. So we
simply gave up trying to win. Demonkrap strategy.
Nixon claimed he HAD a plan to win. He campaigned on it -- that was a
major point of his 1968 campaign. So when he was elected, we must
have won, right?
Post by mrbawana2u
Does that strategy sound familiar, ass eater?
mrbawana2u
2009-03-19 16:55:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by Roger Coppock
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out of Vietnam after 4 1/2 months [ . . . ]
Which is demonstration of wisdom,
To lib-turd retards cowardliness=wisdom.
The demonkrap party is full of cowards.
Post by Roger Coppock
the rest of the country remained
mired in Vietnam much longer.
Demonkraps started the war.
Demonkraps lost the war.
[...]
Historically accurate.
  Cite, please.
Our involvement goes back to the 1950's,
but the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, 1964, which authorized the use of
force (up until then, we were 'advisers') was under LBJ demonkrap.
It was a war fought under terms that would not permit victory. So we
simply gave up trying to win. Demonkrap strategy.
Nixon claimed he HAD a plan to win.  He campaigned on it -- that was a
major point of his 1968 campaign.  So when he was elected, we must
have won, right?
History isn't your strong point, is it, tard?
Who controlled Congress during the Nixon years, tard? demomkraps.
The first act of the newly elected demonkrap Congress was a vote to
cut off funding for South Vietnam
and Cambodia's Lon Nol government in January 1975. After U.S. funding
was cut, the regimes of
South Vietnam and Cambodia were quickly overrun by the communists,
who would go on to slaughter some 2.5 million Indochinese peasants.
Post by mrbawana2u
Does that strategy sound familiar, ass eater?
e***@gmail.com
2009-03-19 18:14:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by Roger Coppock
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out of Vietnam after 4 1/2 months [ . . . ]
Which is demonstration of wisdom,
To lib-turd retards cowardliness=wisdom.
The demonkrap party is full of cowards.
Post by Roger Coppock
the rest of the country remained
mired in Vietnam much longer.
Demonkraps started the war.
Demonkraps lost the war.
[...]
Historically accurate.
  Cite, please.
Our involvement goes back to the 1950's,
but the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, 1964, which authorized the use of
force (up until then, we were 'advisers') was under LBJ demonkrap.
It was a war fought under terms that would not permit victory. So we
simply gave up trying to win. Demonkrap strategy.
Nixon claimed he HAD a plan to win.  He campaigned on it -- that was a
major point of his 1968 campaign.  So when he was elected, we must
have won, right?
History isn't your strong point, is it, tard?
Who controlled Congress during the Nixon years, tard? demomkraps.
So? The prez is commander-in-chief (as Bush showed). All Congress
can do is cut off funding for a war. They don't make policy. Besides,
Nixon never said "I've got a plan for victory in Vietnam if Congress
agrees."
Post by mrbawana2u
The first act of the newly elected demonkrap Congress was a vote to
cut off funding for South Vietnam
and Cambodia's Lon Nol government in January 1975.
And when was Nixon elected? 1968. So in 7 years, Nixon's "plan to
win the war" didn't exactly work, did it?
Post by mrbawana2u
After U.S. funding
was cut, the regimes of
South Vietnam and Cambodia were quickly overrun by the communists,
So what was the alternative, stay there for decades? Have many more
Americans killed and spend billions more? And for what? Doesn't
there come a time when the people have to step up and defend their own
country?
Post by mrbawana2u
who would go on to slaughter some 2.5 million Indochinese peasants.
Post by mrbawana2u
Does that strategy sound familiar, ass eater?
mrbawana2u
2009-03-20 02:30:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by Roger Coppock
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out of Vietnam after 4 1/2 months [ . . . ]
Which is demonstration of wisdom,
To lib-turd retards cowardliness=wisdom.
The demonkrap party is full of cowards.
Post by Roger Coppock
the rest of the country remained
mired in Vietnam much longer.
Demonkraps started the war.
Demonkraps lost the war.
[...]
Historically accurate.
  Cite, please.
Our involvement goes back to the 1950's,
but the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, 1964, which authorized the use of
force (up until then, we were 'advisers') was under LBJ demonkrap.
It was a war fought under terms that would not permit victory. So we
simply gave up trying to win. Demonkrap strategy.
Nixon claimed he HAD a plan to win.  He campaigned on it -- that was a
major point of his 1968 campaign.  So when he was elected, we must
have won, right?
History isn't your strong point, is it, tard?
Who controlled Congress during the Nixon years, tard? demomkraps.
So?  The prez is commander-in-chief (as Bush showed).  All Congress
can do is cut off funding for a war. [drivel flushed]
Which the demonkrap did, tardboy.
The demonkraps wanted the communists to win.
The demonkraps wanted the president and the military to lose.
The demonkraps got their wish...they lost the war.
Post by mrbawana2u
The first act of the newly elected demonkrap Congress was a vote to
cut off funding for South Vietnam
and Cambodia's Lon Nol government in January 1975.
And when was Nixon elected?  1968.  So in 7 years, Nixon's "plan to
win the war" didn't exactly work, did it?
Too bad the demonkrap congress wanted the communists to win.
There were almost twice as many casualties in Southeast Asia
(primarily Cambodia)
the first two years after the fall of Saigon in 1975 then there were
during the ten years the U.S. was involved in Vietnam.
The demonkraps could care less...
Does anything sound familiar to you yet, retard?
Post by mrbawana2u
After U.S. funding
was cut, the regimes of
South Vietnam and Cambodia were quickly overrun by the communists,
So what was the alternative, [drivel flushed]
How about winning, fucktard?
I know, winning against communism is not a concept you lib-turd
retards ever entertain.
e***@gmail.com
2009-03-20 13:45:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by Roger Coppock
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out of Vietnam after 4 1/2 months [ . . . ]
Which is demonstration of wisdom,
To lib-turd retards cowardliness=wisdom.
The demonkrap party is full of cowards.
Post by Roger Coppock
the rest of the country remained
mired in Vietnam much longer.
Demonkraps started the war.
Demonkraps lost the war.
[...]
Historically accurate.
  Cite, please.
Our involvement goes back to the 1950's,
but the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, 1964, which authorized the use of
force (up until then, we were 'advisers') was under LBJ demonkrap.
It was a war fought under terms that would not permit victory. So we
simply gave up trying to win. Demonkrap strategy.
Nixon claimed he HAD a plan to win.  He campaigned on it -- that was a
major point of his 1968 campaign.  So when he was elected, we must
have won, right?
History isn't your strong point, is it, tard?
Who controlled Congress during the Nixon years, tard? demomkraps.
So?  The prez is commander-in-chief (as Bush showed).  All Congress
can do is cut off funding for a war. [drivel flushed]
Which the demonkrap did, tardboy.
The demonkraps wanted the communists to win.
The demonkraps wanted the president and the military to lose.
The demonkraps got their wish...they lost the war.
Post by mrbawana2u
The first act of the newly elected demonkrap Congress was a vote to
cut off funding for South Vietnam
and Cambodia's Lon Nol government in January 1975.
And when was Nixon elected?  1968.  So in 7 years, Nixon's "plan to
win the war" didn't exactly work, did it?
Too bad the demonkrap congress wanted the communists to win.
Sigh. Why do they let mental patients use computers?
Post by mrbawana2u
There were almost twice as many casualties in Southeast Asia
(primarily Cambodia)
the first two years after the fall of Saigon in 1975 then there were
during the ten years the U.S. was involved in Vietnam.
The demonkraps could care less...
Does anything sound familiar to you yet, retard?
Post by mrbawana2u
After U.S. funding
was cut, the regimes of
South Vietnam and Cambodia were quickly overrun by the communists,
So what was the alternative, [drivel flushed]
How about winning, fucktard?
How? When has any country won a guerilla war in a foreign land? At
least in the 20th century? Heck, the Soviets, for all their brutality
and willingness to use weapons the US never would, couldn't win in
Afganistan.
Post by mrbawana2u
I know, winning against communism is not a concept you lib-turd
retards ever entertain.
Yeah, winning aqainst communism is so relevant today. Like worrying
about your 8-track collection.
mrbawana2u
2009-03-20 14:48:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by Roger Coppock
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out of Vietnam after 4 1/2 months [ . . . ]
Which is demonstration of wisdom,
To lib-turd retards cowardliness=wisdom.
The demonkrap party is full of cowards.
Post by Roger Coppock
the rest of the country remained
mired in Vietnam much longer.
Demonkraps started the war.
Demonkraps lost the war.
[...]
Historically accurate.
  Cite, please.
Our involvement goes back to the 1950's,
but the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, 1964, which authorized the use of
force (up until then, we were 'advisers') was under LBJ demonkrap.
It was a war fought under terms that would not permit victory. So we
simply gave up trying to win. Demonkrap strategy.
Nixon claimed he HAD a plan to win.  He campaigned on it -- that was a
major point of his 1968 campaign.  So when he was elected, we must
have won, right?
History isn't your strong point, is it, tard?
Who controlled Congress during the Nixon years, tard? demomkraps.
So?  The prez is commander-in-chief (as Bush showed).  All Congress
can do is cut off funding for a war. [drivel flushed]
Which the demonkrap did, tardboy.
The demonkraps wanted the communists to win.
The demonkraps wanted the president and the military to lose.
The demonkraps got their wish...they lost the war.
Post by mrbawana2u
The first act of the newly elected demonkrap Congress was a vote to
cut off funding for South Vietnam
and Cambodia's Lon Nol government in January 1975.
And when was Nixon elected?  1968.  So in 7 years, Nixon's "plan to
win the war" didn't exactly work, did it?
Too bad the demonkrap congress wanted the communists to win.
Sigh.  Why do they let mental patients use computers?
Because nobody gives a fuck what you do?
I see you can't refute anything I said.
Typical lib-turd retard behavior.
Post by mrbawana2u
There were almost twice as many casualties in Southeast Asia
(primarily Cambodia)
the first two years after the fall of Saigon in 1975 then there were
during the ten years the U.S. was involved in Vietnam.
The demonkraps could care less...
Does anything sound familiar to you yet, retard?
Post by mrbawana2u
After U.S. funding
was cut, the regimes of
South Vietnam and Cambodia were quickly overrun by the communists,
So what was the alternative, [drivel flushed]
How about winning, fucktard?
How?  
Nobody can snatch defeat from the jaws of victory like demonkrap
retards.
When has any country won a guerilla war in a foreign land?  At
least in the 20th century?  Heck, the Soviets, for all their brutality
and willingness to use weapons the US never would, couldn't win in
Afganistan.
The US won in Afganistan.
Kinda makes you look like a tard, tard.
Post by mrbawana2u
I know, winning against communism is not a concept you lib-turd
retards ever entertain.
Yeah, winning aqainst communism is so relevant today. [...]
The demonkraps never wanted to defeat communism, tard.
Pay attention.
e***@gmail.com
2009-03-20 19:25:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by Roger Coppock
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out of Vietnam after 4 1/2 months [ . . . ]
Which is demonstration of wisdom,
To lib-turd retards cowardliness=wisdom.
The demonkrap party is full of cowards.
Post by Roger Coppock
the rest of the country remained
mired in Vietnam much longer.
Demonkraps started the war.
Demonkraps lost the war.
[...]
Historically accurate.
  Cite, please.
Our involvement goes back to the 1950's,
but the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, 1964, which authorized the use of
force (up until then, we were 'advisers') was under LBJ demonkrap.
It was a war fought under terms that would not permit victory. So we
simply gave up trying to win. Demonkrap strategy.
Nixon claimed he HAD a plan to win.  He campaigned on it -- that was a
major point of his 1968 campaign.  So when he was elected, we must
have won, right?
History isn't your strong point, is it, tard?
Who controlled Congress during the Nixon years, tard? demomkraps.
So?  The prez is commander-in-chief (as Bush showed).  All Congress
can do is cut off funding for a war. [drivel flushed]
Which the demonkrap did, tardboy.
The demonkraps wanted the communists to win.
The demonkraps wanted the president and the military to lose.
The demonkraps got their wish...they lost the war.
Post by mrbawana2u
The first act of the newly elected demonkrap Congress was a vote to
cut off funding for South Vietnam
and Cambodia's Lon Nol government in January 1975.
And when was Nixon elected?  1968.  So in 7 years, Nixon's "plan to
win the war" didn't exactly work, did it?
Too bad the demonkrap congress wanted the communists to win.
Sigh.  Why do they let mental patients use computers?
Because nobody gives a fuck what you do?
I see you can't refute anything I said.
Typical lib-turd retard behavior.
Post by mrbawana2u
There were almost twice as many casualties in Southeast Asia
(primarily Cambodia)
the first two years after the fall of Saigon in 1975 then there were
during the ten years the U.S. was involved in Vietnam.
The demonkraps could care less...
Does anything sound familiar to you yet, retard?
Post by mrbawana2u
After U.S. funding
was cut, the regimes of
South Vietnam and Cambodia were quickly overrun by the communists,
So what was the alternative, [drivel flushed]
How about winning, fucktard?
How?  
Nobody can snatch defeat from the jaws of victory like demonkrap
retards.
When has any country won a guerilla war in a foreign land?  At
least in the 20th century?  Heck, the Soviets, for all their brutality
and willingness to use weapons the US never would, couldn't win in
Afganistan.
The US won in Afganistan.
Huh? I bet you think Iraq had WMD and Saddam was responsible for 9/11
too.
Post by mrbawana2u
Kinda makes you look like a tard, tard.
Post by mrbawana2u
I know, winning against communism is not a concept you lib-turd
retards ever entertain.
Yeah, winning aqainst communism is so relevant today. [...]
The demonkraps never wanted to defeat communism, tard.
Pay attention.
mrbawana2u
2009-03-20 20:48:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by mrbawana2u
Post by Roger Coppock
Post by t***@gmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/gore.html
Gore got out of Vietnam after 4 1/2 months [ . . . ]
Which is demonstration of wisdom,
To lib-turd retards cowardliness=wisdom.
The demonkrap party is full of cowards.
Post by Roger Coppock
the rest of the country remained
mired in Vietnam much longer.
Demonkraps started the war.
Demonkraps lost the war.
[...]
Historically accurate.
  Cite, please.
Our involvement goes back to the 1950's,
but the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, 1964, which authorized the use of
force (up until then, we were 'advisers') was under LBJ demonkrap.
It was a war fought under terms that would not permit victory. So we
simply gave up trying to win. Demonkrap strategy.
Nixon claimed he HAD a plan to win.  He campaigned on it -- that was a
major point of his 1968 campaign.  So when he was elected, we must
have won, right?
History isn't your strong point, is it, tard?
Who controlled Congress during the Nixon years, tard? demomkraps.
So?  The prez is commander-in-chief (as Bush showed).  All Congress
can do is cut off funding for a war. [drivel flushed]
Which the demonkrap did, tardboy.
The demonkraps wanted the communists to win.
The demonkraps wanted the president and the military to lose.
The demonkraps got their wish...they lost the war.
Post by mrbawana2u
The first act of the newly elected demonkrap Congress was a vote to
cut off funding for South Vietnam
and Cambodia's Lon Nol government in January 1975.
And when was Nixon elected?  1968.  So in 7 years, Nixon's "plan to
win the war" didn't exactly work, did it?
Too bad the demonkrap congress wanted the communists to win.
Sigh.  Why do they let mental patients use computers?
Because nobody gives a fuck what you do?
I see you can't refute anything I said.
Typical lib-turd retard behavior.
Post by mrbawana2u
There were almost twice as many casualties in Southeast Asia
(primarily Cambodia)
the first two years after the fall of Saigon in 1975 then there were
during the ten years the U.S. was involved in Vietnam.
The demonkraps could care less...
Does anything sound familiar to you yet, retard?
Post by mrbawana2u
After U.S. funding
was cut, the regimes of
South Vietnam and Cambodia were quickly overrun by the communists,
So what was the alternative, [drivel flushed]
How about winning, fucktard?
How?  
Nobody can snatch defeat from the jaws of victory like demonkrap
retards.
When has any country won a guerilla war in a foreign land?  At
least in the 20th century?  Heck, the Soviets, for all their brutality
and willingness to use weapons the US never would, couldn't win in
Afganistan.
The US won in Afghanistan.
Huh? [drivel flushed]
BREAKING NEWS!!!
Yes, retard, the US won in Afghanistan.
Kinda makes you look like a tard, tard.

Give us your lib-turd retard lies about the US's defeat in
Afghanistan...OK?
Nobody can grab defeat from the jaws of victory like the demonkrap lib-
turd retards
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...