Discussion:
World Bank to invest $200bn to combat climate change
Add Reply
Unum
2018-12-03 19:06:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/dec/03/world-bank-invest-climate-change

The World Bank is to make about $200bn (£157bn) available to fund action on
climate change from 2021-25, helping countries adapt to the effects of warming
and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

The sum represents a doubling of the five-year investment plan put in place
after the landmark Paris agreement of 2015.

Governments will meet in Poland this week and next to thrash out an
implementation plan for the Paris accord, which binds countries to hold global
warming to no more than 2C above pre-industrial levels, with an aspiration of
a 1.5C limit.

Reports have shown the dangers of extreme weather if warming reaches 1.5C, and
the need for governments to more than triple their efforts if these goals are
to be maintained.

Jim Yong Kim, the president of the World Bank, said the poorest and most
vulnerable people were at the greatest risk, and urged other financial
institutions to follow its lead.
JTEM is right
2018-12-03 19:22:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
So the ridiculously corrupt World Bank, with
a very $Rich$ history of theft & swindles, is
planning on handing some $200 billion to
European companies in exchange for supplying
unreliable wind & solar to developing countries.

Or military technology, more likely...

And of course these developing countries won't
need their "Carbon Credits" they were forced to
agree to, because of all this money, so the
Europeans can take them...

This is why the whole "Carbon Credit" scheme is
such idiocy. It was rigged from the start. It
was designed as rigged. This is all just European
colonialism under an entirely new label.





-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/180749985146
AlleyCat
2018-12-03 19:56:25 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 13:06:36 -0600, Unum says...
The World Bank is about to make more than $200bn, (their original
investment).
Probably more.

This isn't an article a basement-dwelling anti-capitalist like you, should
be posting.

Are you REALLY that naive, as to think they're doing this for altruistic
reasons?

[giggle]

It's to MAKE money, dumb ass.

Poor spamming idiot. "Look at meeee... look at meeeee." I can post
nonsense to Usenet.

Aw... that's a good boy. Now clean up your hovel before mommy gets back
from work.

Loading Image...

=====

"It's all about money in the end. Keeping the Gravy Train running."


UN Official Admits That Climate Change Used As A Ruse To Control The
World's Economy
http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/diabolical-lie-called-climate-change-used-
un-promote-economic-agenda/

*****

"Unequal Distribution of Wealth and Power" Causes Climate Change
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/11/un-climate-summit-causes-of-
climate-change-unequal-distribution-of-wealth-and-power/

*****

U.N. Official Reveals Real Reason Behind Warming Scare
http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/climate-change-scare-tool-to-
destroy-capitalism/

*****

Another Climate Alarmist Admits Real Motive Behind Warming Scare
http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/another-climate-alarmist-
admits-real-motive-behind-warming-scare/

*****

United Nations Official Admits the Purpose of the Global Warming Hoax is
to Destroy Capitalism
http://lubbockonline.com/interact/blog-post/donald-r-may/2015-02-
27/united-nations-official-admits-purpose-global-warming#.V-nGUOM1HmE
Unum
2018-12-03 23:05:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 13:06:36 -0600, Unum says...
The World Bank is about to make more than $200bn, (their original
investment).
Spamming little moron lied.
http://www.worldbank.org/en/about/what-we-do
"We provide low-interest loans, zero to low-interest credits, and grants to
developing countries."

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/dec/03/world-bank-invest-climate-change

The World Bank is to make about $200bn (£157bn) available to fund action on
climate change from 2021-25, helping countries adapt to the effects of warming
and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

The sum represents a doubling of the five-year investment plan put in place
after the landmark Paris agreement of 2015.

Governments will meet in Poland this week and next to thrash out an
implementation plan for the Paris accord, which binds countries to hold global
warming to no more than 2C above pre-industrial levels, with an aspiration of
a 1.5C limit.

Reports have shown the dangers of extreme weather if warming reaches 1.5C, and
the need for governments to more than triple their efforts if these goals are
to be maintained.

Jim Yong Kim, the president of the World Bank, said the poorest and most
vulnerable people were at the greatest risk, and urged other financial
institutions to follow its lead.
AlleyCat
2018-12-04 02:09:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 17:05:34 -0600, Unum says...
Post by Unum
The World Bank is about to make more than $200bn, (their original
investment).
http://www.worldbank.org/en/about/what-we-do
"We provide low-interest loans, zero to low-interest credits, and grants to
developing countries."
What a fucking turd. JUST because they grant those loans, means they
aren't out to make their money back PLUS a few billion to boot on the
religion of climate change and its industry?

You know, most of what I say regarding you being a basement dwelling
mommy's boy, was just taunting.

Now, seeing how fucking naive you are, not believing that BANKS and other
"investors" in the climate industry are doing their investing to make
money and not "save the planet", I will unequivocally say, "I WAS WRONG."

You ARE a shielded little mommy's boy... or you're just a plain old liar,
like most leftists are these days.

I vote the latter, but you never prove me wrong. You take climate BLOGGERS
at their word, and treat them as kinds of Nostrodamus's, even when they
FAIL at their predictions.

Anti-Capitalism and liberalism really are diseases.

You have a diseased mind, Unum.

THIS should be your next post:

=====

Confessions of a Basement Dweller by Unum

I'm a painfully socially inept basement dweller, and I hate it. I'm
(insert your age here)__. No job, no car, single, living with my mom,
mental health issues up the wazoo and socially inept as all-get-out.

The worst part is that I've seen what this does to people through my
grandmother, who has become so insane and parasitic that even her own
children or grandchildren don't want to talk to her.

At the very least, I want to be better with people. I want to not
unconsciously say or do something that will undo my relationship with
them, or need constant reassurance that I have not done so already.

Something that others likely figured out years ago to the point of at
least having something resembling a stable friendship outside of family,
is as intimidating and terrifying as calculus may be to them.

They say that all you need is confidence, and that you shouldn't worry
what other people think of you - haters gonna hate.

Great advice, if you actually know what you are doing. There are a lot of
confident people in talent shows, with compilations of many of them filed
under "worst" or "fail." And when I see someone unaware of their
incompetence in their skills, or happen to overhear or witness a story of
someone being awkward or creepy, I wonder what separates confidence from
delusion... or me from them.

When I hear such stories, I wonder if I should even try to keep attempting
social interaction... keep being persistent. Or if it is just a creepy
obsession.

I failed hard at it - paying for it by being ostracized, kicked out, and
even committed. I often just avoid saying anything stupid by avoiding
saying anything, and get told that I should just "come out of my shell,"
like there's some beautiful pearl inside. It feels more like a lump of
unappetizing bivalve meat.



Come out of that shell of a basement Unum, AND DO SOMETHING BESIDES
USENET!

[giggle]
Kym Horsell
2018-12-04 02:20:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Tuesday, December 4, 2018 at 1:09:51 PM UTC+11, AlleyCat wrote:
...
Post by AlleyCat
I'm a painfully socially inept basement dweller, and I hate it. I'm
(insert your age here)__. No job, no car, single, living with my mom,
mental health issues up the wazoo and socially inept as all-get-out.
...

You still wid yo mom?

I thought she died of shame 20 years ago?

--
[giggle] Poor Little Spamming Basement Boy Calls ME a Spammer
-- Alleycat Computers & Car Detailing, 30 Nov 2018
Post by AlleyCat
Says the guy that claims to have 1000s of IP's.
Says? Where? When? Cite it, or shut the fuck up, liar. Are you talking
about when I may have said I use a VPN?
-- Alleycat Davis, 01 Dec 2018

I recall it was when you were trying to DOS a web server that was blocking you:
[Forgive the barely-intelligible English:]
$ Loading Image...
$ LOL... take down your page, because of the smarter people giving you hell?
$ Remember to look up the IP I got on your sock puppet with, so you can
$ block it too.
$ That's OKIE fine by me... I've got 1000s of addresses to choose from
-- rkh, 01 Dec 2018

I CAN use 100s (not 1000s) of IPs, IF I WANT, but I don't. I
don't feel the need for anonymity, like you skeered little basement
dwelling children.
-- Alleycat Computers & Car Detailing and 1000 other nyms, 01 Dec 2018 10:56:40
AlleyCat
2018-12-04 03:09:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 18:20:12 -0800 (PST), Kym Horsell says...
Post by Kym Horsell
...
Post by AlleyCat
I'm a painfully socially inept basement dweller, and I hate it. I'm
(insert your age here)__. No job, no car, single, living with my mom,
mental health issues up the wazoo and socially inept as all-get-out.
...
You still wid yo mom?
Whoa... how original.
Post by Kym Horsell
I thought she died of shame 20 years ago?
Seriously? That's the best Australia has to offer? You must be part of
the Colt Clan.

Yup... just a bunch of inbred bogan convicts.


Colt Clan Incest Case
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colt_clan_incest_case

'I'll never get over what I saw there': Inside the vile Colt 'incest
family' - where 38 related members lived in filth and sexual deviancy -
producing a dozen mute and deformed kids -
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5584319/Inside-Colt-incest-
family-discovery-remote-bush-camp-stunned-world.html

LOL
Kym Horsell
2018-12-04 05:31:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 18:20:12 -0800 (PST), Kym Horsell says...
Post by Kym Horsell
...
Post by AlleyCat
I'm a painfully socially inept basement dweller, and I hate it. I'm
(insert your age here)__. No job, no car, single, living with my mom,
mental health issues up the wazoo and socially inept as all-get-out.
...
You still wid yo mom?
Whoa... how original.
...
Since it's yor script so yor talkin at yourself agin.

--
[Ay hillbilly pyramid:]

ALL insurance is a pyramid scheme... a Ponzi scheme, if you will.
They take from Peter, who builds his house on a hill, and Paul, who
builds his in a flood plain, then gives to Paul, when his house is flooded
and Peter's is high and dry.
-- Alleycat Computers aka Hillbilly Davis (100s of 1000s of odda nyms), 16 Nov 2017 05:22Z
AlleyCat
2018-12-04 06:01:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 21:31:58 -0800 (PST), Kym Horsell says...
Post by Kym Horsell
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Kym Horsell
You still wid yo mom?
Whoa... how original.
...
Since it's yor script so yor talkin at yourself agin.
Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... what?

Yup... you're a Colt.

Colt Clan Incest Case
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colt_clan_incest_case

'I'll never get over what I saw there': Inside the vile Colt 'incest
family' - where 38 related members lived in filth and sexual deviancy -
producing a dozen mute and deformed kids -

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5584319/Inside-Colt-incest-
family-discovery-remote-bush-camp-stunned-world.html
Unum
2018-12-04 04:10:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 17:05:34 -0600, Unum says...
Post by Unum
The World Bank is about to make more than $200bn, (their original
investment).
http://www.worldbank.org/en/about/what-we-do
"We provide low-interest loans, zero to low-interest credits, and grants to
developing countries."
What a fucking turd. JUST because they grant those loans, means they
aren't out to make their money back PLUS a few billion to boot on the
religion of climate change and its industry?
So much brainless shrieking, lol.
AlleyCat
2018-12-04 05:44:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 22:10:20 -0600, Unum says...
Post by Unum
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 17:05:34 -0600, Unum says...
Post by Unum
The World Bank is about to make more than $200bn, (their original
investment).
http://www.worldbank.org/en/about/what-we-do
"We provide low-interest loans, zero to low-interest credits, and grants to
developing countries."
What a fucking turd. JUST because they grant those loans, means they
aren't out to make their money back PLUS a few billion to boot on the
religion of climate change and its industry?
So much brainless shrieking, lol.
Yeah, and NO rebuttal from you, pansy, so it is YOU who got her ass
kicked. lol

Sit back... relax and just enjoy this ass whooping, you pansy.

=====

The World Bank and Corruption

"A decade after the World Bank mounted its first anti-corruption campaign,
the impact appears to have been minimal."

https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/world-bank-and-corruption

=====

World Bank Spins Out Of Control: Corruption, Dysfunction Await New
President

"... problems have gotten worse, not better, at the World Bank despite
more than a decade of reform attempts."

https://www.forbes.com/forbes/2012/0716/feature-world-bank-robert-
zoellick-too-big-to-fail.html#49d9cca5219d

=====

World Bank Whistleblower Reveals Massive Corruption

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/kevin-lawton/world-bank-whistleblower_b_
3350872.html

=====

"It's all about money in the end. Keeping the Gravy Train running."
http://youtu.be/J9Oi7x2OBdI

UN Official Admits That Climate Change Used As A Ruse To Control The
World's Economy
http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/diabolical-lie-called-climate-change-used-
un-promote-economic-agenda/

*****

"Unequal Distribution of Wealth and Power" Causes Climate Change
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/11/un-climate-summit-causes-of-
climate-change-unequal-distribution-of-wealth-and-power/

*****

U.N. Official Reveals Real Reason Behind Warming Scare
http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/climate-change-scare-tool-to-
destroy-capitalism/

*****

Another Climate Alarmist Admits Real Motive Behind Warming Scare
http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/another-climate-alarmist-
admits-real-motive-behind-warming-scare/

*****

United Nations Official Admits the Purpose of the Global Warming Hoax is
to Destroy Capitalism
http://lubbockonline.com/interact/blog-post/donald-r-may/2015-02-
27/united-nations-official-admits-purpose-global-warming#.V-nGUOM1HmE
AlleyCat
2018-12-04 05:56:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 17:05:34 -0600, Unum says...
Post by Unum
http://www.worldbank.org/en/about/what-we-do
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Post by Unum
"We provide low-interest loans, zero to low-interest credits, and grants to
developing countries."
Jesus... really? Are you REALLY that fucking naive and believe that shit,
or are you just a dumb fucking bad liar?

=====

The World Bank and Corruption

"A decade after the World Bank mounted its first anti-corruption campaign,
the impact appears to have been minimal."

https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/world-bank-and-corruption

=====

World Bank Spins Out Of Control: Corruption, Dysfunction Await New
President

"... problems have gotten worse, not better, at the World Bank despite
more than a decade of reform attempts."

https://www.forbes.com/forbes/2012/0716/feature-world-bank-robert-
zoellick-too-big-to-fail.html#49d9cca5219d

=====

World Bank Whistleblower Reveals Massive Corruption

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/kevin-lawton/world-bank-whistleblower_b_
3350872.html

=====

"It's all about money in the end. Keeping the Gravy Train running."
http://youtu.be/J9Oi7x2OBdI

UN Official Admits That Climate Change Used As A Ruse To Control The
World's Economy
http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/diabolical-lie-called-climate-change-used-
un-promote-economic-agenda/

*****

"Unequal Distribution of Wealth and Power" Causes Climate Change
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/11/un-climate-summit-causes-of-
climate-change-unequal-distribution-of-wealth-and-power/

*****

U.N. Official Reveals Real Reason Behind Warming Scare
http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/climate-change-scare-tool-to-
destroy-capitalism/

*****

Another Climate Alarmist Admits Real Motive Behind Warming Scare
http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/another-climate-alarmist-
admits-real-motive-behind-warming-scare/

*****

United Nations Official Admits the Purpose of the Global Warming Hoax is
to Destroy Capitalism
http://lubbockonline.com/interact/blog-post/donald-r-may/2015-02-
27/united-nations-official-admits-purpose-global-warming#.V-nGUOM1HmE
JTEM is right
2018-12-04 05:58:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
Are you REALLY that naive, as to think they're doing this for altruistic
reasons?
Well, hey, if there's anything third-world governments
are known for it's caring for the well being of their
people!

Look. Treaties are made with the elite in a country, not
the ordinary people. They got the elite to sign on to
the idiotic "Carbon Credit" scheme. NEXT, they promise
those same elites large sums of money. Oh, you're right,
tiny shreds of money compared to what would really be
needed to do the things they're pretending to do but,
you've got to admit, as far as embezzlement funds go,
even $10 billion is a hell of a lot of money! And the
EU gets their "Carbon Credits," which is what this is
really all about.

Think about it: The third world has the tiniest "CO2
Footprint." What they hell do they need alternative
energy for? But if you want to take their carbon allotment,
what you made them agree to with that treaty (Or! Else!)
then you have to promise them something...

There's nothing good about this. Wars have been fought for
less.






-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/180782282188
k***@gmail.com
2018-12-03 20:05:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
,if China and India do not stop their growth and increase of their emission rate, any measures of anyone else is futile.

Which means this meeting has no real world goal, and they don't care. So are all participants in the rendering of false and forged statistics needed to make their laughable claims of viable control of temperature increase.

This manipulation of money is therefore fraud, larceny and outright embezzlement.

And unwarranted hostile aggression.
k***@gmail.com
2018-12-03 20:42:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-45640706

Here you are, fucking wimpy, annoying dweebs.
A report from genuine greenie weenies describing direct evidence that your dreams of controlling co2 emissions to be COMPLETELY FUTILE!!

But you jerks are not even interested in the FACTS.

The fact being that society has no valid need for you. Your obsession with carbon and saving the planet is mere mental masturbation.

And your only continuing motivation is keeping your cash cow of the fraud of AGW proped up as the useless and detrimental parasites that you are.
Catoni
2018-12-03 23:55:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Unum
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/dec/03/world-bank-invest-climate-change
The World Bank is to make about $200bn (£157bn) available to fund action on
climate change from 2021-25, helping countries adapt to the effects of warming
and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
What a sickening total waste of money..... The elite bureaucrats running that internationalist insitution are mentally damaged brainwashed morons...

They're going to blow all thart money to try to slow warming ... so instead of one or two degrees warmer by 2110....it will be 2114 before we are one or two degrees warmer.. Maybe slow the warming four years.... (IF warming starts up again.....)

Meanwhile.... about 5,000,000 people die each year from diseases carried in bad water and sanitation.

Among which....FOUR THOUSAND CHILDREN DIE EVERY DAY... from diseases caused by bad water and sanitation.

$200 BILLION dollars could bring clean water and sanitation to more than just a few villages... don't you think ? ?

Well... that's "Unum" the Liar's problem.... he DOESN'T think... and neither do the fckuing moron bureaucrats running the World Bank.

"Fighting" the climate and slowing the warming by a couple of years is far more important to them. Much more important that the lives of 4,000 chiuldren dieing horrible suffering deaths each day,....

Mentally twisted bastards,......
Unum
2018-12-04 01:18:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Catoni
Post by Unum
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/dec/03/world-bank-invest-climate-change
The World Bank is to make about $200bn (£157bn) available to fund action on
climate change from 2021-25, helping countries adapt to the effects of warming
and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
What a sickening total waste of money..... The elite bureaucrats running that internationalist insitution are mentally damaged brainwashed morons...
Yawn, cartooni is just a stinking pile of hate.
R Kym Horsell
2018-12-04 01:25:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Unum
Post by Catoni
Post by Unum
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/dec/03/world-bank-invest-climate-change
The World Bank is to make about $200bn (lb157bn) available to fund action on
climate change from 2021-25, helping countries adapt to the effects of warming
and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
What a sickening total waste of money..... The elite bureaucrats running that internationalist insitution are mentally damaged brainwashed morons...
Yawn, cartooni is just a stinking pile of hate.
He sure dont seem to understand banking or even money for some reason.
--
If you don't have 30 years of data and yor a hillbilly den 1 years id plenty.
If you don't have 1 year of data and yor a hillbilly den 1 months id plenty.
If you don't have 1 month of data and yor a hillbilly den 1 day id plenty.
If you don't have anythin on sea ice try shore ice.
If you don't have anythin on shore ice try lake ice.
If you don't have anythin on lake ice try river ice.
All in all if you only has a newspaper headline on a single event that shows
nuttin much then jus fake it like evvy odda day.



ARCTIC supply service to Nunavut and Northwest Territories has been
cancelled due to "Extreme Ice". Canadian Coast Guard, unable to get even its
largest icebreaker through the ice!
-- Mr Cartoony Williamson, 27 Oct 2018 5:37 PM
Catoni
2018-12-06 00:04:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Unum
Post by Catoni
Post by Unum
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/dec/03/world-bank-invest-climate-change
The World Bank is to make about $200bn (£157bn) available to fund action on
climate change from 2021-25, helping countries adapt to the effects of warming
and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
What a sickening total waste of money..... The elite bureaucrats running that internationalist insitution are mentally damaged brainwashed morons...
Yawn, cartooni is just a stinking pile of hate.
Prove my facts wrong..... or is ad hominem avoidance all you have left.. ? ? ?
Unum
2018-12-06 05:43:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Catoni
Post by Unum
Post by Catoni
Post by Unum
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/dec/03/world-bank-invest-climate-change
The World Bank is to make about $200bn (£157bn) available to fund action on
climate change from 2021-25, helping countries adapt to the effects of warming
and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
What a sickening total waste of money..... The elite bureaucrats running that internationalist insitution are mentally damaged brainwashed morons...
Yawn, cartooni is just a stinking pile of hate.
Prove my facts wrong..... or is ad hominem avoidance all you have left.. ? ? ?
Never have seen cartooni come up with any facts. Prove that your
brainless rant is right, you tedious pile of hate.
R Kym Horsell
2018-12-06 05:55:59 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Unum
Post by Catoni
Post by Unum
Post by Catoni
Post by Unum
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/dec/03/world-bank-invest-climate-change
The World Bank is to make about $200bn (lb157bn) available to fund action on
climate change from 2021-25, helping countries adapt to the effects of warming
and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
What a sickening total waste of money..... The elite bureaucrats running that internationalist insitution are mentally damaged brainwashed morons...
Yawn, cartooni is just a stinking pile of hate.
Prove my facts wrong..... or is ad hominem avoidance all you have left.. ? ? ?
Never have seen cartooni come up with any facts. Prove that your
brainless rant is right, you tedious pile of hate.
He's too busy playing the victim after his rant about
"mentally damaged brainwashed morons".

Total waste of O2.
--
[PR failure; how to avoid own goals:]

Tiger Woods' Public Relations Failures
technorati.com/business/article/tiger-woods-public-relations-failures/
12 Dec 2009 ... A case study on how not to handle a public relations
crisis. ... you may think of him being back on the golf course in the
distant future, one thing ...

When PR failures go viral: lessons to be learned
www.theglobeandmail.com/...failures...lessons.../article4389586/
19 Jul 2012 ... Public relations and marketing professionals spend a lot of
time looking for ways to amplify their story. A home run is hit when they
can extend ...

[The long version:]
PR Crisis Communication and Mistakes
marketing.about.com/od/crisis_communication/
Learn what you need to know about developing a crisis communication
plan for your business and how to avoid common PR mistakes that
companies make.

Palin Goes Rogue on Paul Revere's Ride
When you're running for president -- or doing a national bus tour
while teasing the press that you might run for president -- everything
you say is fair game. Especially whatever you say in front of a TV
camera. So when Sarah Palin was asked about Paul Revere and gave a
mangled summary of his ride, it made the news. Gaffes happen to every
public...

3 Key Lessons from the Charlie Sheen PR Debacle
When professional athletes, politicians or rock stars self-destruct,
people naturally pay attention to the celebrity train wreck. Charlie
Sheen's fiery wreckage certainly caught our attention. He did things
different -- he didn't go into hiding or rehab. He took control of his
own publicity and media appearance. He created internet memes at...

Egypt: The First Twitter Revolution?
We may be witnessing the first revolution that started out with a
Twitter hashtag: #jan25. If it succeeds, it will be in no small part
due to a public relations failure by Hosni Mubarak, ruler of Egypt
since 1981. Organizers used Twitter and other social media to start
protests on January 25, despite the fact that such protests are not
allowed...

Arnold Schwarzenegger Terminates His Good Public Image
Scandals involving public figures usually revolve around two things:
money or sex. The worst ones, however, are really about something else
entirely: secrecy, betrayal and hypocrisy. The cover-up is worse than
the crime. Arnold Schwarzenegger hid the fact that he fathered a child
with a maid who worked for his family for 20 years. This scandal...

Weinergate: The Fall of a Promising Politician
How does a random photo on Twitter become fodder for scandal that
might bring down a member of Congress -- a man who many expected to be
the next mayor of New York City? There are key differences between the
kinds of mistakes that get forgiven by the press and public and the
kind that don't. The two key questions are these: First, can you see...

How Lies Work
A rumor can persist when there's a vacuum, especially when it's
referring to events that haven't happened yet. Lies are different. The
facts are known. The tough thing is for a lot of people -- because of
ideology, personal beliefs and other reasons -- don't care about proof
and evidence and facts. They want to believe certain things, whether
they are true or not.

Examples of Rumors and Public Relations
The biggest corporations in the world use rumors. Every day, rumors
cause stock prices to rise and fall, competitors to start madly
developing products -- or abandoning them. Public officials, political
campaigns and advocacy groups traffic in rumors to hurt rivals, kill
legislation or advance an agenda. Many big corporations and public
figures have a policy of never commenting on rumors. This is typically
smart, because rumors only get stronger when you feed them with
attention.
k***@gmail.com
2018-12-06 06:44:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Reduction regime cannot even affect rate of emmisions because continuing growth of China and India.

So the INSANE greenies nonchalantly falsify the facts. Continuing to speak as though they have a viable program which only Trump and the oil companies refuse to believe in or support.

Then little worms like POST TOASTIES here, feel some sense of worth as they crawl under our feet and annoy us.

With no real world connection with environment, energy and taxes, their survivability if they have some measure of success, or the fact that as Americans, we enjoy rights and freedoms.

And have every right to be left alone from this big bunch of conjugated lies and fraud of the deranged aassholes and their fear of carbon.
k***@gmail.com
2018-12-06 07:16:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
He's too busy playing the victim after his rant about
"mentally damaged brainwashed morons".

......
You shouldn't have pissed in your own POST TOASTIES, duffus sucker.
Now you're gonna have to sit there and eat em with a smile.

You got your slant figured out on how to convince the rioters in France on how much you're concerned with their well being from global warming, and they should accept the proscribed carbon tax and more to come, and just shut the fuck up?
k***@gmail.com
2018-12-06 09:21:25 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Got a busy agenda and don't have time to respond to some basic math and the direct accusation that you are disinterested and inept in this most basic fundamental of your supposed 'science'?

If you cannot show the statistics on how emission rate reductions can be effective in reducing carbon dioxide emissions into the atmosphere, then nothing else matters.

No human effort other than complete self annihilation can solve any problem.

Nothing else in the 'science' matters. If there's gong to be a global warming catastrophe, there is nothing to be done.

This fact means the greenies and IPCC are criminal. This money is garnered by fraud and larceny. Manipulation, diatortion, and falsification of the truth is REQUIRED to justify receiving this mooney.

No benifit at all can become of this money directed for such a cause.

It only amounts to support for an unjustified HOLY WAR against the people of the US and will be regarded as such.
k***@gmail.com
2018-12-06 13:24:55 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Loading Image...

This shows China at 3 billion tons per yr in 2001
It then shows China in the list of nations at 10.1 metric tonnes in 2013

This is an increase in emmision rate of 7.1 billion tons per yr in 12 yrs

Which is increasing emission rate 5.9,

6 million tons per yr

US emission rate was about 5.5 billion tons per yr in 2000 and has reduced to around 5+ now.

One can rightly say from this that China is INCREASING their emission RATE between 500-750 milion tons per yr.

There is no evidence that this trend in growth has dramatically changed since 2013, and present, accurate statistics are not forthcoming.

Just the invalid semantics and false statements that China and world emissions have 'plateaued' or stabilized.

Without this LIE, the fraud of the Paris Accord cannot stand

Not many countries have emission rates above 600 million tons per yr, which is how much China is increasing each yr

Empirical facts prove the criminal fraud of the Paris Climate Accord
And the futility of attempts by anyone else to mitigate human emissions into the atmosphere, regardless of what the impact may or not be.
k***@gmail.com
2018-12-06 13:35:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
.Hey POST TOASTIES
.Straight up math lesson
I hate to tell you this, but your greenie weenieism is showing

China is increasing it's emmision rate to double US every 8-10 yrs.
Lets just say 10
If China is at zero to US emission rate in yr 1,
Increases from 0 to 1 US rate in 10 yrs
This means complete elimination of US emission rate would be fully supplanted in 10 yrs. No benifit to having eliminated US

If US stayed at same emission rate for 10 yrs, and during this 10 yrs China increased its rate from 0 to 1 (US rate), at the end of 10 yrs, the combined total quantity would be 1.5 US quantity for 10 yrs.

This increase of rate from 0-1 would produce the quantity 1/2.

China increasing from 0-1 rate, would produce the quantity of 1/2 according to Newton's calculus for uniform acceleration,

1/2 rate squared
Which is rate times 1/2 rate.

So quantity is reverse, or quantity x 2, square root
1.5 quantity x 2, square rooot, square root of 3, or 1.7 quantity.

This is 1.7 decades, or 17 yrs
Complete elimination of US co2 with China's increase would produce same quantity in 17 yrs that would have been produced in 10 yrs.

No benifit whatsoever.

If China is increasing their rate to equal or double US in 10 yrs, in 10 yrs this equals US rate, in 17 yrs same quantity is administered into the environment.

Saving only 7 yrs until same event in 17yrs

Like nothing ever happened.
If you add all actual factors, this math becomes a lot worse for how little time is gained by even immediate complete elimination of US ccontribution. Slow reduction, even to zero would have virtually no effect or benifit.

You shitheads keep calling for your damn carbon program in view of these Gdamn facts is gonna piss someone off someday.

In the meantime, you are clearly incompetent, annoying and dangerous idiots.

Your assault and condemnation of 'deniers' in the West, is unfounded and you all should hang for your futile and unwarrented aggresion.
k***@gmail.com
2018-12-08 04:31:21 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Which is increasing emission rate 5.9,

6 million tons per yr

My typo,,

7.1 biillion tons increase in annual emmsion rate for China, in 12 yrs, means an annual increase of EMMISION RATE of,

600 million tons per yr

Which is increasing the emmission rate by around 5 billion tons per yr in 10 yrs, about equivalent of US steady annual emmision rate

ANY CUTS BY ANYONE ELSE ARE UTTERLY FUTILE

China's annual emmission rate will be around 4 times that of US by 2030

The fundamental science and statistics of the Paris Accord is that world and China's emmisions have 'plateaued', or stabilized, therefore cuts can supposedly be effective in mitigatng co2 introduced into the environment.

DELIBERATE FRAUD

ANY contemplations by the UN and IPCC on US use of carbon, is a hostile act or intent and with the fraud can be considered an act of war.
JTEM is right
2018-12-08 04:58:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by k***@gmail.com
The fundamental science and statistics of the Paris Accord is that world and China's emmisions have 'plateaued', or stabilized, therefore cuts can supposedly be effective in mitigatng co2 introduced into the environment.
DELIBERATE FRAUD
ANY contemplations by the UN and IPCC on US use of carbon, is a hostile act or intent and with the fraud can be considered an act of war.
You're right. It's fraud. Now you either decide that POWERFUL SPACE
ALIENS are at work here or there's a very earthly explanation. That
earthly explanation is oil.

Well, fossil fuels in general but most of all oil.

"Global Warming" solutions all map to fossil fuel availability, and oil
in particular. Population growth and, more importantly, economic
growth is outpacing the oil industry's ability to meet demand. From
that stand point, every drop of oil you can save with wind & solar
makes sense. The idiotic schemes, the ridiculous prices all make
perfect sense in terms of energy AVAILABILITY.

...high prices are economically bad, shortages are economically
much worse!




-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/180895830633
k***@gmail.com
2018-12-08 06:14:21 UTC
Reply
Permalink
The greenie agenda is always at failure.
Compromise is always foolish.

There is abundant oil for now.
If one were to be concerned with co2 emmisions, only coal is relevant and the expansion in it's use in China and Industry and the world in general.

Pre-combustion gasification can make coal very clean, and used by modern plants as being more efficient.

Coal can be made into clean gaseous and liquid fuels, if the price is right, and even with the low grade brown coal.

Greenieism always fails and is ludicrous.

Such as the promotion of ethanol. Which spurs the burning of the Amazon, for the rich soil to grow the sugar cain.

The sugar cain depletes the land quickly. Instead of cultivation, the profit is in just burning off fresh land.
One only gets 85% efficiency from ethanol production. Needing. 85% of the energy of the yield, for production.

This burning produces more co2 than all the world's transportation, and destroys this vital natural sequestration.

Greenie environmentalism and program to reduce emmisions at it's best.
JTEM is right
2018-12-08 15:42:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by k***@gmail.com
There is abundant oil for now.
No there isn't. We'd already be in a crisis, the
Saudis invest MILLIONS into tracking this stuff
and had projected a shortfall to ALREADY strike,
and it's supposedly all this fracking that is
keeping us afloat.

Put another way: New sources aren't coming close
to meeting the increase in demand. For all we know
they're already using the strategic reserves, but
let's say it's the fracking that stopped the shortage.
Fine, we're already fracking. We're already reaping
the benefits of fracking. We can't do that twice. We
already are getting that fracking oil. So as demand
keeps increasing we have to face a shortage.

NOTE: All the alternatives on the planet COMBINED
have not been enough to stop an annual increase in
demand for fossils...
Post by k***@gmail.com
If one were to be concerned with co2 emmisions, only coal is relevant and the expansion in it's use in China and Industry and the world in general.
Coal has a lot wrong with it quite apart from CO2. But,
yes, China is making up for every ounce of coal the
west stops burning, and then some.
Post by k***@gmail.com
Coal can be made into clean gaseous and liquid fuels, if the price is right, and even with the low grade brown coal.
Brown coal is preferred for some applications, as I
understand things.
Post by k***@gmail.com
Greenieism always fails and is ludicrous.
Now this is just plain dumb. You're dismissing your
own knowledge in order to make a political attack...

YOU called the global warming hysterics a fraud. You
called the solutions a fraud. They're not a mistake,
they're a fraud.

You need to assemble all your thoughts, articulate a
single message. Are you still calling it a fraud? If
so, the fact that "Solutions" do not map to the
fraudulent claims hardly constitutes failure.






-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/180895830633
k***@gmail.com
2018-12-09 16:29:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Greenieism always fails and is ludicrous.

Now this is just plain dumb. You're dismissing your
own knowledge in order to make a political attack...

I am not doing any political attack. Only pertinent facts and theory. Political attacks have no value. Everything will be decided in the US Supreme Court eventually. My ONLY motive here is to enlist basic facts and and science, which others can evaluate for veracity and relevance, for pertinent legal application in proper court for US Law.

In this, the only thing of value should be simple truth and fact. Not the BELIEFS or political leanings.
k***@gmail.com
2018-12-09 16:37:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Greenieism always fails and is ludicrous..
...
Consider the town in Kansas, Greensboro, that was devastated by tornado.

Greenies go in and rebuild the entire town green.
Part of which is an central mall with lots of grass and trees to suck up co2 and keep the world average temperature down.

The landscaping and maintenance uses gasoline. Higher carbon footprint. Greenies are insane, though and cannot discuss this candidly or ANY APPLICATION of most basic mathematics.
k***@gmail.com
2018-12-09 18:02:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN1FB2W0
JTEM is right
2018-12-09 19:06:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by k***@gmail.com
Greenieism always fails and is ludicrous..
Two seconds ago you were pretending to not making
political attacks...

You've already concluded that the global warming
narrative, the Paris Accords and the so called
"Solutions" is a deliberate fraud -- that it has
nothing to do with you greenies or "greeneiism."

Be consistent. Stop allowing your Reich wing
emotions to control your thoughts.







-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/180943967423
k***@gmail.com
2018-12-09 22:46:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Loading Image...

This is from E Anglia CRU, the primary Climate institution in the world and thd principle underwriters, editors, and contributors to the IPCC.

Notiice it depicts China at 6.5 billion tons per yr in 2000.
Truth they were less than 3.

What this does is show their rate of increase to be about 4 billion tons per yr, in 15 yrs.

Truth is China has been increasing by 7.2 billion tons per yr, in 12 yrs.

This falsification is needed to make the falsification that 'GROWTH' in world emissions have stabilized or 'plateaued',

Which then makes the deliberate fraud perpetrated at the Paris Conference, that calibration of reduction in emissions rates can be done, and that the conference was quite successful in garnering the pledges that should add up to stopping temperature at precisely 1.7C.

If only those damn deniers don't try to shirk all this brilliant science or even criticise or ask for valid statistics with such celestial and harmonious 'settled science'.

The statement that world emmisions are stablized is a QUANTITATIVE STATEMENT which is PROVABLY false.

I see no 'scientists' of the consensus with any interest or capability within their science to reject this obvious fraud of the PARIS ACCORD.

https://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/carbon-infographics2016.jpg
JTEM is right
2018-12-10 03:23:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by k***@gmail.com
Truth is China has been increasing by 7.2 billion tons per yr, in 12 yrs.
This falsification is needed to make the falsification that 'GROWTH' in world emissions have stabilized or 'plateaued',
Which then makes the deliberate fraud perpetrated at the Paris Conference, that calibration of reduction in emissions rates can be done, and that the conference was quite successful in garnering the pledges that should add up to stopping temperature at precisely 1.7C.
Dude, I don't need any numbers to tell me that "Global
Warming" during an ice age isn't really a crisis. It is,
like you said, a fraud.

It's what you do with that conclusion that I was responding
to.





-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/21529972390
k***@gmail.com
2018-12-10 17:18:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzLSCtO7gbDhUjAwTWM4WHkyRDA/view

This shows atmospheric absorption at 400Wm-2. A fact purposefully hidden by atmospheric scientists because it does not fit with the rinky dink analysis which depicts earth's temperature increased 58F by greenhousee gases.

The stratosphere has thermal inversion due to this absorption of mainly infrared from the sun.
5F at the top of the stratosphere
-60 at the bottom of stratosphere

Outside the atmosphere and on the moon, in direct solar radiation, temperature is 250F. Greenhouse gases do not increase earth temperature and cannot be defined legally or scientifically.

If not for the absorption of infrared from 1-2um and lower energy photons by the 'non-greenhouse gases O2 and N2, earth temperatures would be like the moon and earth would be uninhabitable.

This fact of absorption of infrared by the stratosphere is deliberately hidden and ignored by the fraudists and charlatans of climatology. There's just no cash cow on the real truth or science.
......

I could be a greenie weenie,
Believe what I'm repeating,
If I only had a brain...

Melting ice I'd go to see it,
All my fault I would believe it,
If I only had a brain..

"Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain "
k***@gmail.com
2018-12-10 18:13:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
What the HELL'S UP, POST TOASTIES??

Got a busy agenda and don't have time to respond to some basic math and the direct accusation that you are disinterested and inept in this most basic fundamental of your supposed 'science'?

The actual facts of world emissions and the relevance of proposed cuts in emmision RATES towards any realistic beneficial goal other than enrichment of the corrupt conspiracy milking the cash cow of the BELIEF in anthropogenic global warming.

Sorry to bother your busy ass. Or expect rational discussion about YOUR need to fuck with OUR use of carbon,
k***@gmail.com
2018-12-11 17:37:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzLSCtO7gbDhUjAwTWM4WHkyRDA/view

Here's your kryptonite, greenie weenies.
Although I surely don't expect you to have the math or science to understand it, in the nonsense of your semantics and cultured BELIEFS you got gpoing on in your daily PARASITIC MENTAL MASTURBATION.

It is the basic fundamental in understanding atmospheric thermodynamics.
It is the DEATH KNELL to greenie theory of AGW.

But in your obsession with innocent people's use of carbon, you will avoid this truth and continue your lies until you really really piss off the people you attack.
k***@gmail.com
2018-12-12 16:51:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
KRYPTONITE!!!
k***@gmail.com
2018-12-13 11:06:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
.."""... in the history of mankind that we are setting
ourselves the task..:"""

...we...?

These greenies sure are
annoying dweebs.

First of all they can't do a lick of math. You can't tell them that you cannot change the moons orbit by pointing a flashlight at it, and they simply have no mathematical concepts to go with their demented and neurotic semantics.

And then their use of the word,," we ".

They are terminally deficient in English and definition and use of the word,,,"WE".
The air is common. So "we" should embark on suicide mission to eliminate carbon. These "wes", usually come from people like John Kerry and RFK,jr. Who tool around in their Lear Jets.
Or Berney Sanders. "Its real,,,WE..must do SOMETHING about it".

(He just cant get over that Obama beat him out for being algore's BITCH, for the role playing as Batman and Robin.... You can put that Robin outfit away, Bernie. Obama done got the job).

Greenies need to learn that THEIR paranoia and phobias of co2 do not constitute a need for US to commit suicide by their failures at math and English, and the use of the word, "we".
k***@gmail.com
2018-12-13 11:25:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna946826

Our Man Trump

Spoiling all that sincere and empathetic science.

After all that science and calculations of the Paris Accord, that discovered that we were exactly in the groove with accumulation of anthropogenic co2, and that the pledges and proposed cuts would be just the ticket to STOP temperature rise below the 2C level that spells the catastrophe and DOOMSDAY SCENARIO so clear to the forensic climatologists (climies) in their prognostications and soothsaying.

There are actually grown men, some even with degrees in science, that BELIEVE this total joke and scam which is the Paris Accord.
k***@gmail.com
2018-12-13 16:08:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzLSCtO7gbDhUjAwTWM4WHkyRDA/view

GREENIE KRYPTONITE

RUN AND HIDE, YOU FUCKING LITTLE WIENIES

There are no GHGs.
Something is blocking 400Wm-2 of solar radiation from traversing the stratosphere. It's not 'greenhouse' gases and this proves the invented dynamics of their existence to be FALSE.

Every effort has been made by the fraudists, thieves, and charlatans of climatology to avoid and hide this most basic of atmospheric science.

The facts are wholly incompatible with the rinky dink theory of these fools and miscreants to humanity.

Too late to improve your theory.

What's the sense of changing horses in mid-stream?
Hqhahahahahahahahahahahahahah

And you little worms can shove all your insults to rational people up your ass.
k***@gmail.com
2018-12-14 06:08:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
KRYPTONITE
k***@gmail.com
2018-12-14 06:14:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
After the greenies get rid of any use of carbon, that poisons their environment, they're gonna go after that elusive substance they fear even more than carbon.

GREENIE KRYPTONITE

JTEM is right
2018-12-09 19:04:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by k***@gmail.com
I am not doing any political attack.
The greenies aren't the perpetrators of the fraud.
They did not originate it. They are the victims of
the fraud. They are being manipulated by the fraud.

Ignore the greenies. Because, even if you somehow
"Defeated" the greenies you'd still have to battle
the people behind the fraud. But if you ignore the
greens and battle the people behind the fraud, and
win, you automatically defeat the greenies.

So, stop wasting time antagonizing greenies. It just
helps your real enemies.






-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/180943967423
k***@gmail.com
2018-12-08 06:22:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
..save with wind & solar
makes sense. The idiotic schemes, the ridiculous prices ..

Wind power is about worthless.

Quebec abandoned a big wind project. The company in charge said its cost was 100 million dollars.

For electricity for 5000 households.

And this does not include the cost of having fully maintained and operational stanby alternative, (coal plants), or the cost of maintenance for the windmills.

Without government subsidy, wind generation is not economically feasible.
JTEM is right
2018-12-08 15:53:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by k***@gmail.com
Without government subsidy, wind generation is not economically feasible.
Nuclear power wasn't economically feasible.
Plans were cancelled, even plants under
construction were stopped because nuclear
power was so ridiculously expensive. But now
it isn't. And, no, not because the plants
got so cheap and the waste disposal is free,
it's because as expensive as it is, it sure
beats not having any power!

So...

Wind & solar are economical. True. Which means
that, like nuclear, the economics are not in
terms of the present costs but of near term
future costs. Or, even more likely, availability.

Look. You yourself denounce the global warming
narrative as fraud. Well "Fraud" is an intentional
act, the people behind it know it's a fraud, they
know what the truth is. Stop assuming that just
because they have all the money, all the power and
all the influence -- enough to perpetrate such a
fraud -- that they must be really stupid.

The policies, the actions do not map to the things
they claim to want to address, yes. But they map
to something. They are addressing something, and
it's intentional.








-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/180895830633
k***@gmail.com
2018-12-09 15:55:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
The fraud is in the science. There is no AGW.
The fraud is in the statistics. They always speak as though there is a solution to their imagined DOOMSDAY, but they have to falsify these statistics.

They have no intention to work with you on valid improvements in energy. Your attitude of cooperation is only nativity and delusion.

Energy conservation is good, and smart economically.
Their intention is to completely modify and control your life, if this includes genocide.

PROOF THAT THEY ARE INSANE, is their deliberate avoidancs of the clear cut facts of the ststistics.

World emmisions of co2 are now around 50 billion tons per yr, and increasing rapidly, although for this 'greatest threat', the basics are unavailable.

First the lie is made that growth is stabilized. Pure blatant falshood. World emmision rate is RAPIDLY INCREASING.

Even if it was 'plateaued or stabilized', suppose at 50 billion tons per yr, complete elimination of US inpiut, around 5 billion tons per yr, over 10 yrs, would save only 1.1 yr.

10 yrs at 50 billion tons per yr = 500 billion tons, quantity.
11.1 yrs at 45 billion tons per yr = 500 billion tons, quantity.

Savings of 1.1 yr in 10 yrs, with immediate and complete elimination of US emmisions.

OF NO VALUE WHATSOEVER

THIS IS THE NATURE OF THE BEAST
WHICH CANNOT BE CHANGED BY SEMMANTICS of the propaganda.

And is scientific and LEGAL PROOF OF THE INSANITY OF THE PROPONENTS OF CARBON REDUCTION REGIME.

NO GDAMN COMPROMISE!!!

And you.are damn wrong about renewable and nuclear being cheaper. This is a propaganda statement that is only true if you tax carbon through the roof.
AlleyCat
2018-12-04 02:35:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 13:06:36 -0600, Unum says...
Post by Unum
The World Bank is to make about $200bn (£157bn)
Sounds about right.

It's ONLY about making more money.

Again... they don't CARE about the planet and its people. Along with
"Sir" David Attenborough, they're probably on a list of people who think
the planet has too many people and they need to be culled, but with more
people, comes more money they can swindle from them.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/earthnews/9815862/Humans-are-
plague-on-Earth-Attenborough.html

IF they REALLY cared, they would spend that money on third world and
developing countries helping build infrastructure for cheap and affordable
energy. Instead, they want to "invest" in early-warning systems? LOL

"... providing early-warning systems and high-quality weather forecasts,
which is expected to help 250 million people in 30 developing countries
prepare for extreme weather."

"Further funding will go towards "smart agriculture", which is better
adapted to the expected changes in weather and will help protect food
production in some of the worst-affected developing countries. It will
also help to protect 120m hectares of forest."

How in the FUCK is that going to lower temperatures?

BUILD THEM SOME FUCKING CHEAP POWER PLANTS.

What they're doing has NOTHING to do with "saving the planet." It's about
making more money... they even SAY it in the article Unum posted:

"Of the $200bn, half will come in direct funding from the World Bank and
half will be loans and other forms of assistance from other parts of the
World Bank group, aimed at MOBILIZING FURTHER FINANCE from the private
sector."

Andrew Steer, the president of the World Resources Institute, said the
bold and ambitious commitments would send a strong signal to private
sector financiers.

"With climate impacts already taking a heavy toll around the globe, we
know a far greater response is needed. Investing in climate action is the
smart choice - it can reduce poverty, inspire innovation and bring far-
reaching benefits to society," he said.

Annnnd make you more money!

=====

THIS is total bullshit:

Kristalina Georgieva, the chief executive of the World Bank, said: "People
are losing their lives and livelihoods because of the disastrous effects
of climate change. We must fight the causes but also adapt to the
consequences."

People have been dying for more than a millennium, and BEFORE CO² started
to rise.

1317) The worst drought ever seen in Europe, the Great Drought and Famine
of 1315-1317, also known as the Great European Drought and Famine,
killed an estimated 7.5 million people.

1603) Russian Drought and Famine of 1601-1603 Killing one-third of
the population.

1632) India... Deccan drought and Famine of 1630-1632: An estimated two
million perished.

1770) Bengal Drought and Famine of 1770 - An estimated 15 million perished
in the Drought and Famine

1868) Finnish Drought and Famine of 1866-1868 Killed between 15 and 20
percent of the population in the area or roughly 150,000 people.

1878) Indian Great Drought and Famine of 1876-1878 This tragedy that took
the lives of as many as 10.3 million.

1879) Northern Chinese Drought and Famine Lasted from 1876 to 1879 and is
believed to have killed 13 million people.

What was the CO² level(s) from those years, basement dweller?
--
Climate Hillbilly Davis
k***@gmail.com
2018-12-04 03:25:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
...implementation plan for the Paris accord, which binds countries to hold global
warming to no more than 2C above pre-industrial levels, with an aspiration of
a 1.5C limit.

Reports have shown the dangers of extreme weather if warming reaches 1.5C, and
the need for governments to more than triple their efforts if these goals are
to be maintained....

Hahahahahahahahahah
There are actually grown men, some with degrees in science that take this ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT seriously.

The IPCC can control temperature rise within a 10th of a deg.
Even they acknowledge, that by their figuring, they must entirely eliminate co2 emmisions. They just try not to say it out load and let their mathematically inept comrades do they talking.

To stop temperature rise, according to their theory, overall quantity must be limited and stopped. There is a specific quantity for 2C of total quantity emited by humans since industrialization. With this direct relationship of total quantity to temperature rise is calculated the quantities for 1.7C and 1.5C.

This means of calibrating human impact on temperature, was first developed in 2009, just before the Copenhagen Conference. With this, the fraudist then tell the world leaders if they cut emmisions collectively, these cuts in emmision rates calibrate to specific temperature control.

They needed this to sell their fraud. All other attempts at dealing with actual dynamics of their fabricated scientific theory were at obvious failure.

The idea that rising temperature above 2C would bring devasting effect is from earlier than this. Hansen or someone said this, and it became standard in the squawking order of the charlatans and parrots.

Then it was combined into what is now present theory and propaganda, and the flat lie that there is a program available which has been reviewed and certified by competent and certified 'scientists', that temperature can be controlled by the program and pledges obtained at the Paris, 'Save the Climate' telethon. (Hosted by Obama, the CLIMATE MEISTER).


Besides being the most horrendous fraud attempted on civilization it is also the biggest joke.

These greenie criminals do not take themselves seriously.
And any rational person does not either.

Except to recognize the danger they pose, both to our economy and rational thought and science.
46.165.242.91 178.63.61.175 = left-wing morons
2018-12-04 16:52:59 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Toady global warmers.

http://siteresources.worldbank.org/ESSDNETWORK/Resources/481106-1129303936381/1777397-1129303967165/chapter1.html
k***@gmail.com
2018-12-05 12:21:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Bilking the UN on the pretext of concern or benifit to needy people.

Based on falsified statistics on world and China's emmisions?

ALL the scientists signed on the Federal report should be criminally held liable for promotion of the fraud and propaganda that US temperatures have risen 1.8F in last 100 yrs.

Every act of violence, computer attacks, embezzlement, and the intended unawrrented attack on the use of carbon, is blood on the hands of these charlatans and thieves,

They will be held accountable at some pòint in the future.

Simply not true that US temperature have risen 1.8F, or thst humams arr the csuse.

Clear documentation exists to prosecute this crime and hold all complicit scientists liable, cupable and intrinsically incompetent.

Deliberate propaganda meant to inspire the violence and attacks of dememted believers of human causes.
k***@gmail.com
2018-12-05 12:35:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Hey POST TOASTIES
Straight up math lesson

China is increasing it's emmision rate to double US every 8-10 yrs.
Lets just say 10
If China is at zero to US emission rate in yr 1,
Increases from 0 to 1 US rate in 10 yrs
This means complete elimination of US emission rate would be fully supplanted in 10 yrs. No benifit to having eliminated US

If US stayed at same emission rate for 10 yrs, and during this 10 yrs China increased its rate from 0 to 1 (US rate), at the end of 10 yrs, the combined total quantity would be 1.5 US quantity for 10 yrs.

This increase of rate from 0-1 would produce the quantity 1/2.

China increasing from 0-1 rate, would produce the quantity of 1/2 according to Newton's calculus for uniform acceleration,

1/2 rate squared
Which is rate times 1/2 rate.

So quantity is reverse, or quantity x 2, square root
1.5 quantity x 2, square rooot, square root of 3, or 1.7 quantity.

This is 1.7 decades, or 17 yrs
Complete elimination of US co2 with China's increase would produce same quantity in 17 yrs that would have been produced in 10 yrs.

No benifit whatsoever.

If China is increasing their rate to equal or double US in 10 yrs, in 10 yrs this equals US rate, in 10 yrs same quantity is administered into the environment.

Like nothing ever happened.
If you add all actual factors, this math becomes a lot worse for how little time is gained by even immediate complete elimination of US ccontribution. Slow reduction, even to zero would have virtually no effect or benifit.

You shitheads keep calling for your damn carbon program in view of these Gdamn facts is gonna piss someone off someday.

In the meantime, you are clearly incompetent, annoying and dangerous idiots.

Your assault and condemnation of 'deniers' in the West, is unfounded and you all should hang for your futile and unwarrented aggresion.
k***@gmail.com
2018-12-05 13:04:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
What the HELL'S UP, POST TOASTIES??

Got a busy agenda and don't have time to respond to some basic math and the direct accusation that you are disinterested and inept in this most basic fundamental of your supposed 'science'?

The actual facts of world emissions and the relevance of proposed cuts in emmision RATES towards any realistic beneficial goal other than enrichment of the corrupt conspiracy milking the cash cow of the BELIEF in anthropogenic global warming.

Sorry to bother your busy ass. Or expect rational discussion about YOUR need to fuck with OUR use of carbon,
k***@gmail.com
2018-12-05 15:26:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
...Got a busy agenda and don't have time to respond to some basic math and the direct accusation that you are disinterested and inept in this most basic fundamental of your supposed 'science'?
..

You are worthless pig, POST TOASTIES
You have nothing of value for society except being a royal pain in the ass as you whine about our use of carbon.

Someday your mama's gonna take your blowup dolls of Obama and Algore away from you and kick you out of the basement.
Loading...