Discussion:
Coal-filled trains are likely sending people to the hospital
(too old to reply)
Unum
2024-07-19 18:46:05 UTC
Permalink
https://arstechnica.com/science/2024/07/coal-pollution-is-killing-people-even-when-were-not-burning-it/

Although US coal consumption has fallen dramatically since 2005, the country
still consumes millions of tons a year, and exports tons moreā€”much of it
transported by train. Now, new research shows that these trains can affect the
health of people living near where they pass.

The study found that residents living near railroad tracks likely have higher
premature mortality rates due to air pollutants released during the passage of
uncovered coal trains. The analysis of the San Francisco Bay Area cities of
Oakland, Richmond, and Berkeley shows that increases in air pollutants such as
small particulate matter (PM 2.5) are also associated with increases in
asthma-related episodes and hospital admissions.

Trains carry nearly 70 percent of coal shipments in the United States, leaving
a trail of pollution in their wake. And coal exports will have a similar
impact during transit. Ostro explained that when uncovered coal trains travel,
the coal particles disperse around the railroad tracks. Levels of PM 2.5
"[spread] almost a mile away," he added.

This year, in a follow-up study, researchers combined these findings with US
Census data and health studies to understand how this increase might affect
local communities. They estimated that more than 260,000 people would be
exposed to some increase in annual PM 2.5, and that such exposure was
associated with significant mortality and morbidity.
R Kym Horsell
2024-07-19 19:13:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Unum
https://arstechnica.com/science/2024/07/coal-pollution-is-killing-people-even-when-were-not-burning-it/
Although US coal consumption has fallen dramatically since 2005, the country
still consumes millions of tons a year, and exports tons more???much of it
transported by train. Now, new research shows that these trains can affect the
health of people living near where they pass.
...

Imagine if someone had to pay for knowingly lowering life expectancies
over over 100+ years.


States like: Coal consump Lifex Model lifex
(bn tons/yr)
District.of.Columbia 0.250500 78.65 79.1348
Hawaii 0.831000 81.3 79.1231*
Massachusetts 1.392670 79.8667 79.1118
South.Dakota 1.979000 79.5 79.0999
Washington 4.616000 79.9 79.0468
Montana 10.462000 78.5 78.9289
Virginia 11.706000 79 78.9038
South.Carolina 12.583500 76.35 78.8861*
Utah 15.676000 80.2 78.8237
Minnesota 17.781000 81.1 78.7813*
Kansas 18.288500 79.35 78.7711
Oklahoma 19.471000 75.95 78.7472*
Tennessee 20.278000 77.05 78.7309*
Wisconsin 22.860500 79.85 78.6789
Georgia 23.555500 78.3 78.6648
Wyoming 27.941000 78.3 78.5764
North.Dakota 28.816000 79.5 78.5588
Michigan 31.944000 78.2 78.4957
Kentucky 40.262000 76 78.3279*
Ohio 43.585000 77.8 78.2609
Missouri 44.231000 77.5 78.2479
Pennsylvania 46.481000 78.5 78.2025
Texas 102.962000 78.5 77.0635*

T-test: P(beta<0) = 92%
Rank test: P(order by X is opposite of order by Y) = 99%+
The predicted lifex for Texas is 2y lower than the predicted lifex for DC
"because" of coal consumption.
--
[Serial Dimwit cain nebba tell the diff between Melbourne and Darwin,
a urologist from a data scientist with a name in common, carbon 12 from
carbon 13, or carbon from carbon dioxide:]
Post by Unum
On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 15:55:21 -0600, Unum says...
Hmmm... why is the ONLY site saying that we're putting 40gts, (39.8gt,
actually), a GOVERNMENT run site?
NO ONE else is saying it's that high... NO ONE. So, again, you are lying,
because THEY are lying.
...[ and on and on and on and on like he does ...]
Post by Unum
2006 9.355 Gtc 8.363 GtC 0.992 GtC
^^^ bn tonnes of carbon not CO2

You didn't see the footnote, dumbass?
*Convert carbon to carbon dioxide (CO2) by multiplying the numbers
above by 3.67.
-- Unum, 09 Mar 2016
Loading...