On Wed, 4 Sep 2024 11:18:42 -0700, Alan says...
Post by AlanPost by AlleyCatWhat are those conditions?
According to you, it's your job to refute what I've said.
Refute what I claimed, first, faggot-1.
I "support" my claim with the post, you fucking faggot-kissing moron.
I've shown you the quotes by the liars who said we're going to have ice-free Arctic Sea Ice.
I guess you agree that they were wrong, since you never showed they didn't.
You forget that there's more to this quote than just the 75% part.
"2009: There is a 75% chance that the entire North Polar Ice Cap during some of the summer months could be
completely ice-free within the next five to seven years. You have sea ice, which is melting at a rate that
the Arctic Ocean now increasingly is exposed. In five years, scientists predict WE WILL HAVE THE FIRST ICE-
FREE ARCTIC SUMMER."
Not all of these quotes have "could be's" and "may be's".
June 8, 1972, Christian Science Monitor: "Arctic specialist Bernt Balchen says a general warming trend over
the North Pole is melting the polar ice cap and may produce an ice-free Arctic Ocean by the year 2000."
"A leading NASA ice scientist, Jay Zwally, said last year that the Arctic could be essentially ice-free
within "five to less than 10 years."
In 2007, academics and politicians started making predictions of an IMMINENT ice-free Arctic. The BBC said
the Arctic would be ice-free by 2013...
June 8, 1972, Christian Science Monitor: "Arctic specialist Bernt Balchen says a general warming trend over
the North Pole is melting the polar ice cap and may produce an ice-free Arctic Ocean by the year 2000."
The BBC in 2007: 'Their latest modelling indicates that northern polar waters could be ice-free in summers
within just 5-6 years.'
Professor Wieslaw Maslowski from the Department of Oceanography of the US Navy predicted an ice-free Arctic
Ocean by the summer of 2013.
"So once again, the bottom line is that the Arctic summer is too short, and there's no way to achieve an ice-
free Arctic. 16 years ago, the experts were wrong because they don't understand basic physics. But *I* get
accused of spreading misinformation every day because I provide accurate information about climate." - Tony
Heller
=============================================================================
Global Warming Explains EVERYTHING!
Global Warming makes for shorter winters, except for when it makes for longer winters.
Global Warming means less snow, except for when Global Warming means more snow.
And Global Warming causes droughts in California and floods in Texas and Oklahoma and generally makes wet
places wetter and dry places dryer, except when it makes wet places drier and dry places wetter, except when
none of that changes at all, and then Global Warming explains that too!
And Global Warming causes more hurricanes at the same time as it causes less hurricanes.
Global Warming causes more rain but less water... and less rain but more water?
Global Warming causes more water vapour in the atmosphere with more snow and rain, at the same time it causes
less water vapour in the atmosphere, with less snow and rain?
Global Warming decreases the spread of malaria at the same time as it increases the spread of malaria.
Global Warming makes San Francisco foggier... Global Warming makes San Francisco less foggy.
Global Warming causes duller autumn leaves... Global Warming causes shinier autumn leaves.
Global Warming makes for less salty seas... Global Warming makes for saltier seas.
Global Warming causes the polar ice caps to melt... Global Warming also causes the polar ice caps to freeze.
Global Warming makes the Earth hotter, unless the Earth isn't getting hotter... in which case, Global Warming
can explain that too.
What's the problem here? This sounds like the perfect scientific theory. It can explain literally everything
including self contradictory things.
This means it's absolutely perfect, doesn't it?
Well no, not according to Karl Popper and the philosophers of science and within the philosophy of science
there's something called the demarcation problem... how do you differentiate science from pseudo-science?
The left won't LET you, and brands you a denierrrrrrr(whining).
