There Is A Lot More Sea Ice Around Antarctica Than There Was In 1980

Post by AlleyCat
So WHY are the chicken shit Chicken Littles screeching that we're all going to
die soon?
https://noaadata.apps.nsidc.org/NOAA/G02135/south/daily/images/
https://i.imgur.com/Mz2JYjg.png

Because two data points don't represent a trend, loser.

AlleyCat

2024-04-13 17:15:26 UTC

On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 08:55:42 -0700, Alan says...

Because two data points don't represent a trend, loser.

No no no... CO² has been rising steadily since the Little Ice Age, and WARMING
drives that CO² out of its sinks. Temperature has NOT risen OR fallen in
accordance with that CO². CO² has, indeed, followed temperature rise.

https://i.imgur.com/chQsqdJ.mp4

https://i.imgur.com/gGZgyi4.mp4

https://i.imgur.com/dm5aM7u.mp4

https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1772638782312927233/pu/vid/avc1/626x360/I5
atcXnb7dCVr6xZ.mp4?tag=12

IF CO² is supposed to be "driving climate", then, WITH the CO² rising, temps,
snow, ice, etc., should also follow.

If there's EVER more snow or ice any year AFTER another while temps are going
up, then CO² is NOT what's causing warming.

Still warming up to before the Little Ice Age.

https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1779195352228241408/pu/vid/avc1/626x360/m6
bIO58iNasDOzgJ.mp4?tag=12

=====

April:

Another Three Avalanche Deaths In The Alps

Indian State Suffers Coldest April Day On Record

The Arctic Was Warmer In The 1920s

Today's Arctic Sea Ice Extent Matches 1996

Snow Remains In Northern India

Germany Regrets Disbanding Nuclear Plants, It Was A "Mistake"

Yukon Snowpack Breaks Records

Early Snows Hit Australia's Ski Fields

It's Still Snowing On Kilimanjaro... Al Gore Was Wrong (as usual)

Alyeska Exceeds 700 Inches

Rare April Snow Hits Boise

Montreal's Snowiest April Since 2010

Clearing Crews Reach Baralacha

Antarctica At -75.8C (-104.4F)

Alta Posts Rare Back-To-Back 600+ Inch Winters

Indian Army Rescues 80 Trapped By Spring Snowfall

Remarkable Antarctic Sea Ice Recovery

April Nor'Easter Drops Feet Of Snow

600,000 Lose Power As 'Spring' Storm Batters Quebec

Avalanche Hits Helicopter In The Alps, Killing 3

Scandinavia Breaks Historic Low Temperature Stretch

New Zealand's Record-Cold March

Rare April Snow To Dust Bay Area Peaks

More Snow For The Midwest/Northeast

Scandinavia Extends Spell Of Historic April Cold, As Europe's Mountain Snow
Breaks Records

Sweden Sets Coldest April Temperature

Swiss Avalanche Kills 3

Utah Snowpack At 132%, California Defies The 'Experts'

Anchorage Only 6.3" Away From All-Time Record

Colder-Than-Average March At Vostok

Antarctica Dips Below -100F

"Significant Spring Snowstorm" Takes Aim At Canada/Northern US

April Snow Builds Across Europe's Higher Elevations

Alan

2024-04-13 17:34:47 UTC

Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 08:55:42 -0700, Alan says...

Because two data points don't represent a trend, loser.

Because there is more going on that just CO2, loser.

That's actually WHY you need to look at trends over a long baseline.

What you can't do is cherry pick two dates.

Phil Hendry's Chop shop

2024-04-13 18:36:02 UTC

On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 10:34:47 -0700

Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 08:55:42 -0700, Alan says...

Post by AlleyCat
So WHY are the chicken shit Chicken Littles screeching that we're
all going to die soon?
https://noaadata.apps.nsidc.org/NOAA/G02135/south/daily/images/
https://i.imgur.com/Mz2JYjg.png

Because two data points don't represent a trend, loser.

Because there is more going on that just CO2, loser.

That's for sure!

The magnetosphere has weakened by over %30!

Post by Alan
That's actually WHY you need to look at trends over a long baseline.

Like the 3/6/12,000 year solar micronova cycle, true.

Post by Alan
What you can't do is cherry pick two dates.

What you can't do is accept ANY dates, chucklenuts.

Alan

2024-04-13 20:54:43 UTC

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 10:34:47 -0700

Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 08:55:42 -0700, Alan says...

Post by AlleyCat
So WHY are the chicken shit Chicken Littles screeching that we're
all going to die soon?
https://noaadata.apps.nsidc.org/NOAA/G02135/south/daily/images/
https://i.imgur.com/Mz2JYjg.png

Because two data points don't represent a trend, loser.

Because there is more going on that just CO2, loser.

That's for sure!
The magnetosphere has weakened by over %30!

9%... ...but then I can expect accuracy from you.

Post by Alan
That's actually WHY you need to look at trends over a long baseline.

Like the 3/6/12,000 year solar micronova cycle, true.

There is no such thing as a "micronova cycle"...

...at least not for our sun.

Post by Alan
What you can't do is cherry pick two dates.

What you can't do is accept ANY dates, chucklenuts.

I want to see the whole picture, doofus.

Phil Hendry's Chop shop

2024-04-13 21:43:37 UTC

On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 13:54:43 -0700

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 10:34:47 -0700

Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 08:55:42 -0700, Alan says...

Post by AlleyCat
So WHY are the chicken shit Chicken Littles screeching that
we're all going to die soon?
https://noaadata.apps.nsidc.org/NOAA/G02135/south/daily/images/
https://i.imgur.com/Mz2JYjg.png

Because two data points don't represent a trend, loser.

Because there is more going on that just CO2, loser.

That's for sure!
The magnetosphere has weakened by over %30!

9%... ...but then I can expect accuracy from you.

Nope - 30% and growing.

Post by Alan
That's actually WHY you need to look at trends over a long
baseline.

Like the 3/6/12,000 year solar micronova cycle, true.

There is no such thing as a "micronova cycle"...
...at least not for our sun.

That's a GODDAMNED LIE!

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/solar-superflares-rocked-earth-less-than-10-000-years-ago-and-could-strike-again/

In a paper led by Brehm, available as a preprint on Research Square,
scientists reveal the possible discovery of two frightfully strong
solar events. One occurred in 7176 B.C., when nomadic hunter-gatherer
societies were giving way to agrarian settlements. The other happened
in 5259 B.C., as the planet emerged from the last ice age. Both events
are thought to have been at least as strong as the one in A.D. 775, and
for the past decade scientists have been searching for similarly
extreme occurrences. Brehm’s team is the first to find some. “It’s a
great achievement,” says Fusa Miyake of Nagoya University in Japan, who
led the study in 2012 that revealed the 775 event. Scientists now refer
to such superflares as “Miyake events.”

Post by Alan
What you can't do is cherry pick two dates.

What you can't do is accept ANY dates, chucklenuts.

I want to see the whole picture, doofus.

You can't even see the data already shared, deceitful turdlicker.

Alan

2024-04-13 23:11:39 UTC

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 13:54:43 -0700

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 10:34:47 -0700

Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 08:55:42 -0700, Alan says...

Post by AlleyCat
So WHY are the chicken shit Chicken Littles screeching that
we're all going to die soon?
https://noaadata.apps.nsidc.org/NOAA/G02135/south/daily/images/
https://i.imgur.com/Mz2JYjg.png

Because two data points don't represent a trend, loser.

Because there is more going on that just CO2, loser.

That's for sure!
The magnetosphere has weakened by over %30!

9%... ...but then I can expect accuracy from you.

Nope - 30% and growing.

Got a source?

Thought not.

Post by Alan
That's actually WHY you need to look at trends over a long
baseline.

Like the 3/6/12,000 year solar micronova cycle, true.

There is no such thing as a "micronova cycle"...
...at least not for our sun.

That's a GODDAMNED LIE!
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/solar-superflares-rocked-earth-less-than-10-000-years-ago-and-could-strike-again/
In a paper led by Brehm, available as a preprint on Research Square,
scientists reveal the possible discovery of two frightfully strong
solar events. One occurred in 7176 B.C., when nomadic hunter-gatherer
societies were giving way to agrarian settlements. The other happened
in 5259 B.C., as the planet emerged from the last ice age. Both events
are thought to have been at least as strong as the one in A.D. 775, and
for the past decade scientists have been searching for similarly
extreme occurrences. Brehm’s team is the first to find some. “It’s a
great achievement,” says Fusa Miyake of Nagoya University in Japan, who
led the study in 2012 that revealed the 775 event. Scientists now refer
to such superflares as “Miyake events.”

Post by Alan
What you can't do is cherry pick two dates.

What you can't do is accept ANY dates, chucklenuts.

I want to see the whole picture, doofus.

You can't even see the data already shared, deceitful turdlicker.

I saw the two data points out of thousands.

Phil Hendry's Chop shop

2024-04-14 14:44:25 UTC

On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 16:11:39 -0700

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 13:54:43 -0700

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 10:34:47 -0700

Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 08:55:42 -0700, Alan says...

Post by AlleyCat
So WHY are the chicken shit Chicken Littles screeching that
we're all going to die soon?
https://noaadata.apps.nsidc.org/NOAA/G02135/south/daily/images/
https://i.imgur.com/Mz2JYjg.png

Because two data points don't represent a trend, loser.

Because there is more going on that just CO2, loser.

That's for sure!
The magnetosphere has weakened by over %30!

9%... ...but then I can expect accuracy from you.

Nope - 30% and growing.

Got a source?

Yes:

https://www.science.org/content/article/earths-waning-magnet

SAN FRANCISCO--Earth's magnetic field is rapidly getting weaker, and
geophysicists don't know why. The decrease in strength--a startling 10%
in the last 160 years--could signal that the magnetic field is starting
one of its sporadic flip-flops.

https://www.livescience.com/46694-magnetic-field-weakens.html

Earth's magnetic field, which protects the planet from huge blasts of deadly solar radiation, has been weakening over the past six months, according to data collected by a European Space Agency (ESA) satellite array called Swarm.

The biggest weak spots in the magnetic field — which extends 370,000 miles (600,000 kilometers) above the planet's surface — have sprung up over the Western Hemisphere, while the field has strengthened over areas like the southern Indian Ocean, according to the magnetometers onboard the Swarm satellites — three separate satellites floating in tandem.

The scientists who conducted the study are still unsure why the
magnetic field is weakening, but one likely reason is that Earth's
magnetic poles are getting ready to flip, said Rune Floberghagen, the
ESA's Swarm mission manager. In fact, the data suggest magnetic north
is moving toward Siberia.

Post by Alan
Thought not.

Given they ceased reporting the numbers recent data is less visible.

However:

https://www.science.org/content/article/time-new-compass-earth-s-magnetic-field-may-be-slowly-flipping

Earth's magnetic field is weakening faster than scientists previously
predicted, raising speculation that the planet's poles are in the
process of flipping, Motherboard reports. New data from the European
Space Agency's Swarm satellites show that Earth's magnetic field is
losing 5% of its strength annually, a rate roughly 10 times faster than
previously predicted. Scientists are not sure what is causing the rapid
decrease, but this pattern is thought to occur whenever Earth's
magnetic poles are about to flip, an event that happens about every
100,000 years.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ancient-earths-weakened-magnetic-field-may-have-driven-mass-extinction/

FEBRUARY 15, 2019

Ancient Earth’s Weakened Magnetic Field May Have Driven Mass Extinction

When our planet’s magnetosphere nearly disappeared 565 million years
ago, it may have almost taken all life with it

Some 565 million years ago, life on Earth dodged a bullet. The magnetosphere—the magnetic field that surrounds our planet like a protective shield—had degraded to its lowest intensity ever, according to a study published January 28 in Nature Geoscience. Stripped of this shielding, Earth could have been blasted by atmosphere-eroding outbursts from the sun, gradually losing most of its air and water until it became as dry and desolate as present-day Mars.

Instead, deep in the planet’s interior an event was taking place that would help the magnetosphere rebound, according to the study’s authors. Earth’s liquid-iron inner core crystallized, a process geophysicists call “nucleation.” Once solid, the rotating core acted as a whirling dynamo, strengthening the protective electromagnetic bubble that wrapped around Earth, staving off planet-wide devastation. That, in turn, could have set the stage for the Cambrian explosion, an event approximately 541 million years ago in which the biosphere suddenly experienced the greatest evolutionary expansion in the planet’s history.

SHIELDS DOWN
The weakened magnetic field Tarduno and his colleagues discovered roughly coincided with the end-Ediacaran extinction around 542 million years ago—a mass die-off of primitive, sessile, sea-dwelling organisms that preceded the Cambrian explosion. In 2016 Carlo Doglioni, a geologist at Sapienza University of Rome, proposed the Cambrian’s profusion of new life-forms took place in part because of the magnetosphere’s growing strength. “The magnetic dipole was increasing after the Ediacaran,” Doglioni says. “We have a good, thick atmosphere that is protecting us from ionizing radiation because we have a good, strong magnetic field.” Fossil evidence suggests the organisms that endured the end-Ediacaran extinction survived by burrowing into the seafloor—a trait not shared by the immobile Ediacaran period biota that died out. As for the actual culprits in the killings, a 2016 study from Joseph Meert, a geologist at the University of Florida, blames harmful ultraviolet light and cosmic radiation that bathed the surface after passing through ancient Earth’s weakened magnetic field and thinning atmosphere. “When the shields went down, the Ediacaran organisms went extinct, clearing the ecological space for the later Cambrian explosion,” he says.

Post by Alan
That's actually WHY you need to look at trends over a long baseline.

Like the 3/6/12,000 year solar micronova cycle, true.

There is no such thing as a "micronova cycle"...
...at least not for our sun.

That's a GODDAMNED LIE!
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/solar-superflares-rocked-earth-less-than-10-000-years-ago-and-could-strike-again/
In a paper led by Brehm, available as a preprint on Research Square,
scientists reveal the possible discovery of two frightfully strong
solar events. One occurred in 7176 B.C., when nomadic
hunter-gatherer societies were giving way to agrarian settlements.
The other happened in 5259 B.C., as the planet emerged from the
last ice age. Both events are thought to have been at least as
strong as the one in A.D. 775, and for the past decade scientists
have been searching for similarly extreme occurrences. Brehm’s team
is the first to find some. “It’s a great achievement,” says Fusa
Miyake of Nagoya University in Japan, who led the study in 2012
that revealed the 775 event. Scientists now refer to such
superflares as “Miyake events.”

Post by Alan
What you can't do is cherry pick two dates.

What you can't do is accept ANY dates, chucklenuts.

I want to see the whole picture, doofus.

You can't even see the data already shared, deceitful turdlicker.

I saw the two data points out of thousands.

You see nothing because you are a disinformation shill.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/07/200706094136.htm

A new study by the University of Leeds and University of California at
San Diego reveals that changes in the direction of the Earth's magnetic
field may take place 10 times faster than previously thought.

Their study, published in Nature Communications, shows that changes in the direction of Earth's magnetic field reached rates that are up to 10 times larger than the fastest currently reported variations of up to one degree per year.

They demonstrate that these rapid changes are associated with local weakening of the magnetic field. This means these changes have generally occurred around times when the field has reversed polarity or during geomagnetic excursions when the dipole axis -- corresponding to field lines that emerge from one magnetic pole and converge at the other -- moves far from the locations of the North and South geographic poles.

The clearest example of this in their study is a sharp change in the geomagnetic field direction of roughly 2.5 degrees per year 39,000 years ago. This shift was associated with a locally weak field strength, in a confined spatial region just off the west coast of Central America, and followed the global Laschamp excursion -- a short reversal of the Earth's magnetic field roughly 41,000 years ago.

Similar events are identified in computer simulations of the field which can reveal many more details of their physical origin than the limited paleomagnetic reconstruction.

Their detailed analysis indicates that the fastest directional changes
are associated with movement of reversed flux patches across the
surface of the liquid core. These patches are more prevalent at lower
latitudes, suggesting that future searches for rapid changes in
direction should focus on these areas.

Alan

2024-04-14 16:31:29 UTC

Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 08:55:42 -0700, Alan says...

Post by AlleyCat
So WHY are the chicken shit Chicken Littles
screeching that we're all going to die soon?
https://noaadata.apps.nsidc.org/NOAA/G02135/south/daily/images/

https://i.imgur.com/Mz2JYjg.png

Post by Alan
Because two data points don't represent a trend,
loser.

Because there is more going on that just CO2, loser.

That's for sure!
The magnetosphere has weakened by over %30!

9%... ...but then I can expect accuracy from you.

Nope - 30% and growing.

Got a source?

https://www.science.org/content/article/earths-waning-magnet
SAN FRANCISCO--Earth's magnetic field is rapidly getting weaker, and
geophysicists don't know why. The decrease in strength--a startling
10% in the last 160 years--could signal that the magnetic field is
starting one of its sporadic flip-flops.

Which says "10%".

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
https://www.livescience.com/46694-magnetic-field-weakens.html
Earth's magnetic field, which protects the planet from huge blasts of
deadly solar radiation, has been weakening over the past six months,
according to data collected by a European Space Agency (ESA)
satellite array called Swarm.
The biggest weak spots in the magnetic field — which extends 370,000
miles (600,000 kilometers) above the planet's surface — have sprung
up over the Western Hemisphere, while the field has strengthened over
areas like the southern Indian Ocean, according to the magnetometers
onboard the Swarm satellites — three separate satellites floating in
tandem.
The scientists who conducted the study are still unsure why the
magnetic field is weakening, but one likely reason is that Earth's
magnetic poles are getting ready to flip, said Rune Floberghagen,
the ESA's Swarm mission manager. In fact, the data suggest magnetic
north is moving toward Siberia.

Post by Alan
Thought not.

Given they ceased reporting the numbers recent data is less visible.

Oh, look! A completely unsupported assertion!

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
https://www.science.org/content/article/time-new-compass-earth-s-magnetic-field-may-be-slowly-flipping
Earth's magnetic field is weakening faster than scientists
previously predicted, raising speculation that the planet's poles are
in the process of flipping, Motherboard reports. New data from the
European Space Agency's Swarm satellites show that Earth's magnetic
field is losing 5% of its strength annually, a rate roughly 10 times
faster than previously predicted. Scientists are not sure what is
causing the rapid decrease, but this pattern is thought to occur
whenever Earth's magnetic poles are about to flip, an event that
happens about every 100,000 years.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ancient-earths-weakened-magnetic-field-may-have-driven-mass-extinction/

"5% [] annually"...

...for how many years?

The data they cite is from satellites that had only been in orbit for
less than 3 years...

...and if you trace back to the article they cite, there is no mention
of "5%"

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
FEBRUARY 15, 2019
Ancient Earth’s Weakened Magnetic Field May Have Driven Mass
Extinction
When our planet’s magnetosphere nearly disappeared 565 million years
ago, it may have almost taken all life with it
Some 565 million years ago, life on Earth dodged a bullet. The
magnetosphere—the magnetic field that surrounds our planet like a
protective shield—had degraded to its lowest intensity ever,
according to a study published January 28 in Nature Geoscience.
Stripped of this shielding, Earth could have been blasted by
atmosphere-eroding outbursts from the sun, gradually losing most of
its air and water until it became as dry and desolate as present-day
Mars.
Instead, deep in the planet’s interior an event was taking place that
would help the magnetosphere rebound, according to the study’s
authors. Earth’s liquid-iron inner core crystallized, a process
geophysicists call “nucleation.” Once solid, the rotating core acted
as a whirling dynamo, strengthening the protective electromagnetic
bubble that wrapped around Earth, staving off planet-wide
devastation. That, in turn, could have set the stage for the Cambrian
explosion, an event approximately 541 million years ago in which the
biosphere suddenly experienced the greatest evolutionary expansion in
the planet’s history.
SHIELDS DOWN The weakened magnetic field Tarduno and his colleagues
discovered roughly coincided with the end-Ediacaran extinction around
542 million years ago—a mass die-off of primitive, sessile,
sea-dwelling organisms that preceded the Cambrian explosion. In 2016
Carlo Doglioni, a geologist at Sapienza University of Rome, proposed
the Cambrian’s profusion of new life-forms took place in part because
of the magnetosphere’s growing strength. “The magnetic dipole was
increasing after the Ediacaran,” Doglioni says. “We have a good,
thick atmosphere that is protecting us from ionizing radiation
because we have a good, strong magnetic field.” Fossil evidence
suggests the organisms that endured the end-Ediacaran extinction
survived by burrowing into the seafloor—a trait not shared by the
immobile Ediacaran period biota that died out. As for the actual
culprits in the killings, a 2016 study from Joseph Meert, a geologist
at the University of Florida, blames harmful ultraviolet light and
cosmic radiation that bathed the surface after passing through
ancient Earth’s weakened magnetic field and thinning atmosphere.
“When the shields went down, the Ediacaran organisms went extinct,
clearing the ecological space for the later Cambrian explosion,” he
says.

No mention of "30%".

Etc.

Hint: when someone provides masses of text...

...it's obvious that the text they're providing doesn't actually provide
the support they claim.

Phil Hendry's Chop shop

2024-04-14 16:48:03 UTC

On Sun, 14 Apr 2024 09:31:29 -0700

Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 08:55:42 -0700, Alan says...

Post by AlleyCat
So WHY are the chicken shit Chicken Littles
screeching that we're all going to die soon?
https://noaadata.apps.nsidc.org/NOAA/G02135/south/daily/images/

https://i.imgur.com/Mz2JYjg.png

Post by Alan
Because two data points don't represent a trend,
loser.

Because there is more going on that just CO2, loser.

That's for sure!
The magnetosphere has weakened by over %30!

9%... ...but then I can expect accuracy from you.

Nope - 30% and growing.

Got a source?

https://www.science.org/content/article/earths-waning-magnet
SAN FRANCISCO--Earth's magnetic field is rapidly getting weaker,
and geophysicists don't know why. The decrease in strength--a
startling 10% in the last 160 years--could signal that the magnetic
field is starting one of its sporadic flip-flops.

Which says "10%".

Accurate to that publication date, perhaps:
12 DEC 2003

You will note - we're 21 years on now.

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
https://www.livescience.com/46694-magnetic-field-weakens.html
Earth's magnetic field, which protects the planet from huge blasts
of deadly solar radiation, has been weakening over the past six
months, according to data collected by a European Space Agency (ESA)
satellite array called Swarm.
The biggest weak spots in the magnetic field — which extends 370,000
miles (600,000 kilometers) above the planet's surface — have sprung
up over the Western Hemisphere, while the field has strengthened
over areas like the southern Indian Ocean, according to the
magnetometers onboard the Swarm satellites — three separate
satellites floating in tandem.
The scientists who conducted the study are still unsure why the
magnetic field is weakening, but one likely reason is that Earth's
magnetic poles are getting ready to flip, said Rune Floberghagen,
the ESA's Swarm mission manager. In fact, the data suggest magnetic
north is moving toward Siberia.

Post by Alan
Thought not.

Given they ceased reporting the numbers recent data is less
visible.

Oh, look! A completely unsupported assertion!

Not at all:

"...one likely reason is that Earth's
magnetic poles are getting ready to flip, said Rune Floberghagen,
the ESA's Swarm mission manager. In fact, the data suggest magnetic
north is moving toward Siberia..."

You do know the poles are moving, don't you?

https://www.newsweek.com/earth-magnetic-north-pole-follows-unusual-path-races-towards-siberia-1789823

The Earth's magnetic north pole is racing towards Siberia—and it is
following an "unusual" and historically unprecedented path on its way.

Experts told Newsweek that the pole could reach the vast Russian region
as soon as the middle of the century.

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
https://www.science.org/content/article/time-new-compass-earth-s-magnetic-field-may-be-slowly-flipping
Earth's magnetic field is weakening faster than scientists
previously predicted, raising speculation that the planet's poles
are in the process of flipping, Motherboard reports. New data from
the European Space Agency's Swarm satellites show that Earth's
magnetic field is losing 5% of its strength annually, a rate
roughly 10 times faster than previously predicted. Scientists are
not sure what is causing the rapid decrease, but this pattern is
thought to occur whenever Earth's magnetic poles are about to flip,
an event that happens about every 100,000 years.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ancient-earths-weakened-magnetic-field-may-have-driven-mass-extinction/

"5% [] annually"...
...for how many years?

Can't you read for comprehension, troll?

If we're down 30% now the last 6 or so years showed rapid degradation,
hence the Auroral displays well into the mid latitudes, ya dumb fuck!

Post by AlleyCat
The data they cite is from satellites that had only been in orbit for
less than 3 years...

And before that there were no satellites, is that your final answer,
troll?

Post by AlleyCat
...and if you trace back to the article they cite, there is no
mention of "5%"

Liar!

"Previously, researchers estimated the field was weakening about 5
percent per century, but the new data revealed the field is actually
weakening at 5 percent per decade, or 10 times faster than thought.
As such, rather than the full flip occurring in about 2,000 years, as
was predicted, the new data suggest it could happen sooner."

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
FEBRUARY 15, 2019
Ancient Earth’s Weakened Magnetic Field May Have Driven Mass Extinction
When our planet’s magnetosphere nearly disappeared 565 million
years ago, it may have almost taken all life with it
Some 565 million years ago, life on Earth dodged a bullet. The
magnetosphere—the magnetic field that surrounds our planet like a
protective shield—had degraded to its lowest intensity ever,
according to a study published January 28 in Nature Geoscience.
Stripped of this shielding, Earth could have been blasted by
atmosphere-eroding outbursts from the sun, gradually losing most of
its air and water until it became as dry and desolate as present-day
Mars.
Instead, deep in the planet’s interior an event was taking place
that would help the magnetosphere rebound, according to the study’s
authors. Earth’s liquid-iron inner core crystallized, a process
geophysicists call “nucleation.” Once solid, the rotating core acted
as a whirling dynamo, strengthening the protective electromagnetic
bubble that wrapped around Earth, staving off planet-wide
devastation. That, in turn, could have set the stage for the
Cambrian explosion, an event approximately 541 million years ago in
which the biosphere suddenly experienced the greatest evolutionary
expansion in the planet’s history.
SHIELDS DOWN The weakened magnetic field Tarduno and his colleagues
discovered roughly coincided with the end-Ediacaran extinction
around 542 million years ago—a mass die-off of primitive, sessile,
sea-dwelling organisms that preceded the Cambrian explosion. In 2016
Carlo Doglioni, a geologist at Sapienza University of Rome, proposed
the Cambrian’s profusion of new life-forms took place in part
because of the magnetosphere’s growing strength. “The magnetic
dipole was increasing after the Ediacaran,” Doglioni says. “We have
a good, thick atmosphere that is protecting us from ionizing
radiation because we have a good, strong magnetic field.” Fossil
evidence suggests the organisms that endured the end-Ediacaran
extinction survived by burrowing into the seafloor—a trait not
shared by the immobile Ediacaran period biota that died out. As for
the actual culprits in the killings, a 2016 study from Joseph
Meert, a geologist at the University of Florida, blames harmful
ultraviolet light and cosmic radiation that bathed the surface
after passing through ancient Earth’s weakened magnetic field and
thinning atmosphere. “When the shields went down, the Ediacaran
organisms went extinct, clearing the ecological space for the later
Cambrian explosion,” he says.

No mention of "30%".

No reason for them to report honestly, look at your rampantly
denialistic attitude.

Post by AlleyCat
Etc.
Hint: when someone provides masses of text...

Hint - when you REFUSE to read the very citations you demanded...

Post by AlleyCat
...it's obvious that the text they're providing doesn't actually
provide the support they claim.

It's obvious you are a denialist - does that shilling pay well?

Alan

2024-04-15 20:03:09 UTC

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
On Sun, 14 Apr 2024 09:31:29 -0700

Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 08:55:42 -0700, Alan says...

Post by AlleyCat
So WHY are the chicken shit Chicken Littles
screeching that we're all going to die soon?
https://noaadata.apps.nsidc.org/NOAA/G02135/south/daily/images/

https://i.imgur.com/Mz2JYjg.png

Post by Alan
Because two data points don't represent a trend,
loser.

Because there is more going on that just CO2, loser.

That's for sure!
The magnetosphere has weakened by over %30!

9%... ...but then I can expect accuracy from you.

Nope - 30% and growing.

Got a source?

https://www.science.org/content/article/earths-waning-magnet
SAN FRANCISCO--Earth's magnetic field is rapidly getting weaker,
and geophysicists don't know why. The decrease in strength--a
startling 10% in the last 160 years--could signal that the magnetic
field is starting one of its sporadic flip-flops.

Which says "10%".

12 DEC 2003
You will note - we're 21 years on now.

So your contention (do you know what that means in this context?) is
that something that was changing at approximately 0.063% per year
suddenly started changing at about 1% per year; at factor of 16 times
faster?

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
https://www.livescience.com/46694-magnetic-field-weakens.html
Earth's magnetic field, which protects the planet from huge blasts
of deadly solar radiation, has been weakening over the past six
months, according to data collected by a European Space Agency (ESA)
satellite array called Swarm.
The biggest weak spots in the magnetic field — which extends 370,000
miles (600,000 kilometers) above the planet's surface — have sprung
up over the Western Hemisphere, while the field has strengthened
over areas like the southern Indian Ocean, according to the
magnetometers onboard the Swarm satellites — three separate
satellites floating in tandem.
The scientists who conducted the study are still unsure why the
magnetic field is weakening, but one likely reason is that Earth's
magnetic poles are getting ready to flip, said Rune Floberghagen,
the ESA's Swarm mission manager. In fact, the data suggest magnetic
north is moving toward Siberia.

Post by Alan
Thought not.

Given they ceased reporting the numbers recent data is less
visible.

Oh, look! A completely unsupported assertion!

"...one likely reason is that Earth's
magnetic poles are getting ready to flip, said Rune Floberghagen,
the ESA's Swarm mission manager. In fact, the data suggest magnetic
north is moving toward Siberia..."

The unsupported assertion was that "they ceased reporting the numbers"...

...and nothing you have said supports that.

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
You do know the poles are moving, don't you?
https://www.newsweek.com/earth-magnetic-north-pole-follows-unusual-path-races-towards-siberia-1789823
The Earth's magnetic north pole is racing towards Siberia—and it is
following an "unusual" and historically unprecedented path on its way.
Experts told Newsweek that the pole could reach the vast Russian region
as soon as the middle of the century.

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
https://www.science.org/content/article/time-new-compass-earth-s-magnetic-field-may-be-slowly-flipping
Earth's magnetic field is weakening faster than scientists
previously predicted, raising speculation that the planet's poles
are in the process of flipping, Motherboard reports. New data from
the European Space Agency's Swarm satellites show that Earth's
magnetic field is losing 5% of its strength annually, a rate
roughly 10 times faster than previously predicted. Scientists are
not sure what is causing the rapid decrease, but this pattern is
thought to occur whenever Earth's magnetic poles are about to flip,
an event that happens about every 100,000 years.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ancient-earths-weakened-magnetic-field-may-have-driven-mass-extinction/

"5% [] annually"...
...for how many years?

Can't you read for comprehension, troll?
If we're down 30% now the last 6 or so years showed rapid degradation,
hence the Auroral displays well into the mid latitudes, ya dumb fuck!

Begging the question. You cannot support your claim by citing your claim.

Post by AlleyCat
The data they cite is from satellites that had only been in orbit for
less than 3 years...

And before that there were no satellites, is that your final answer,
troll?

Post by AlleyCat
...and if you trace back to the article they cite, there is no
mention of "5%"

Liar!
"Previously, researchers estimated the field was weakening about 5
percent per century, but the new data revealed the field is actually
weakening at 5 percent per decade, or 10 times faster than thought.
As such, rather than the full flip occurring in about 2,000 years, as
was predicted, the new data suggest it could happen sooner."

"5 percent per decade" doesn't come from the Scientific article you
cited above. It comes from a CBS News article that you haven't
previously cited.

And this new cite claims "5 percent per decade", not 5% annually.

You're really bad at this.

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
FEBRUARY 15, 2019
Ancient Earth’s Weakened Magnetic Field May Have Driven Mass Extinction
When our planet’s magnetosphere nearly disappeared 565 million
years ago, it may have almost taken all life with it
Some 565 million years ago, life on Earth dodged a bullet. The
magnetosphere—the magnetic field that surrounds our planet like a
protective shield—had degraded to its lowest intensity ever,
according to a study published January 28 in Nature Geoscience.
Stripped of this shielding, Earth could have been blasted by
atmosphere-eroding outbursts from the sun, gradually losing most of
its air and water until it became as dry and desolate as present-day
Mars.
Instead, deep in the planet’s interior an event was taking place
that would help the magnetosphere rebound, according to the study’s
authors. Earth’s liquid-iron inner core crystallized, a process
geophysicists call “nucleation.” Once solid, the rotating core acted
as a whirling dynamo, strengthening the protective electromagnetic
bubble that wrapped around Earth, staving off planet-wide
devastation. That, in turn, could have set the stage for the
Cambrian explosion, an event approximately 541 million years ago in
which the biosphere suddenly experienced the greatest evolutionary
expansion in the planet’s history.
SHIELDS DOWN The weakened magnetic field Tarduno and his colleagues
discovered roughly coincided with the end-Ediacaran extinction
around 542 million years ago—a mass die-off of primitive, sessile,
sea-dwelling organisms that preceded the Cambrian explosion. In 2016
Carlo Doglioni, a geologist at Sapienza University of Rome, proposed
the Cambrian’s profusion of new life-forms took place in part
because of the magnetosphere’s growing strength. “The magnetic
dipole was increasing after the Ediacaran,” Doglioni says. “We have
a good, thick atmosphere that is protecting us from ionizing
radiation because we have a good, strong magnetic field.” Fossil
evidence suggests the organisms that endured the end-Ediacaran
extinction survived by burrowing into the seafloor—a trait not
shared by the immobile Ediacaran period biota that died out. As for
the actual culprits in the killings, a 2016 study from Joseph
Meert, a geologist at the University of Florida, blames harmful
ultraviolet light and cosmic radiation that bathed the surface
after passing through ancient Earth’s weakened magnetic field and
thinning atmosphere. “When the shields went down, the Ediacaran
organisms went extinct, clearing the ecological space for the later
Cambrian explosion,” he says.

No mention of "30%".

No reason for them to report honestly, look at your rampantly
denialistic attitude.

You cited them to support YOUR claim of 30%.

Now you're claiming your own chosen support is lying?

Post by AlleyCat
Etc.
Hint: when someone provides masses of text...

Hint - when you REFUSE to read the very citations you demanded...

Post by AlleyCat
...it's obvious that the text they're providing doesn't actually
provide the support they claim.

It's obvious you are a denialist - does that shilling pay well?

Denialist of what exactly?

Lil-man-ball

2024-04-15 20:25:29 UTC

On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 13:03:09 -0700

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
On Sun, 14 Apr 2024 09:31:29 -0700

Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 08:55:42 -0700, Alan says...

Post by AlleyCat
So WHY are the chicken shit Chicken Littles
screeching that we're all going to die soon?
https://noaadata.apps.nsidc.org/NOAA/G02135/south/daily/images/

https://i.imgur.com/Mz2JYjg.png

Post by Alan
Because two data points don't represent a trend,
loser.

Because there is more going on that just CO2, loser.

That's for sure!
The magnetosphere has weakened by over %30!

9%... ...but then I can expect accuracy from you.

Nope - 30% and growing.

Got a source?

https://www.science.org/content/article/earths-waning-magnet
SAN FRANCISCO--Earth's magnetic field is rapidly getting weaker,
and geophysicists don't know why. The decrease in strength--a
startling 10% in the last 160 years--could signal that the
magnetic field is starting one of its sporadic flip-flops.

Which says "10%".

12 DEC 2003
You will note - we're 21 years on now.

Exactly!

I'm truly astounded you can even admit as much, you must have seen:

Loading Image...

The biggest weak spots in the magnetic field — which extends 370,000
miles (600,000 kilometers) above the planet's surface — have sprung up
over the Western Hemisphere

Loading Image...

.webp

32K views 3 years ago
A weaker magnetic field will make the planet more susceptible to solar radiation and put space equipment at risk.

@MG.50
3 years ago (edited)
Did everyone miss the magnetic excursion, meaning the magnetic poles
are moving and probably "reversing"? In these reversals the magnetic
field has dropped to 25%of full strength in past flips. There are also
(contested) correlation with mass extinctions. This time, however, the
sun is also going into a "minimum" period, further reducing Earth's
protective magnetic shields.

Post by Alan
https://www.livescience.com/46694-magnetic-field-weakens.html

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
https://www.livescience.com/46694-magnetic-field-weakens.html
Earth's magnetic field, which protects the planet from huge blasts
of deadly solar radiation, has been weakening over the past six
months, according to data collected by a European Space Agency
(ESA) satellite array called Swarm.
The biggest weak spots in the magnetic field — which extends
370,000 miles (600,000 kilometers) above the planet's surface —
have sprung up over the Western Hemisphere, while the field has
strengthened over areas like the southern Indian Ocean, according
to the magnetometers onboard the Swarm satellites — three separate
satellites floating in tandem.
The scientists who conducted the study are still unsure why the
magnetic field is weakening, but one likely reason is that Earth's
magnetic poles are getting ready to flip, said Rune Floberghagen,
the ESA's Swarm mission manager. In fact, the data suggest
magnetic north is moving toward Siberia.

Post by Alan
Thought not.

Given they ceased reporting the numbers recent data is less visible.

Oh, look! A completely unsupported assertion!

The unsupported assertion was that "they ceased reporting the
numbers"...
...and nothing you have said supports that.

So where's the present data located?

https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/data-on-the-earths-magnetic-field-and-its-secular-change-since-1800

Over 750 reports published from the 1830's to 1980's were inventoried
in a digital bibliography and digitally imaged in .PCX format. The
digital images of these reports have been written to magnetic tape.

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
https://www.science.org/content/article/time-new-compass-earth-s-magnetic-field-may-be-slowly-flipping
Earth's magnetic field is weakening faster than scientists
previously predicted, raising speculation that the planet's poles
are in the process of flipping, Motherboard reports. New data from
the European Space Agency's Swarm satellites show that Earth's
magnetic field is losing 5% of its strength annually, a rate
roughly 10 times faster than previously predicted. Scientists are
not sure what is causing the rapid decrease, but this pattern is
thought to occur whenever Earth's magnetic poles are about to
flip, an event that happens about every 100,000 years.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ancient-earths-weakened-magnetic-field-may-have-driven-mass-extinction/

"5% [] annually"...
...for how many years?

Can't you read for comprehension, troll?
If we're down 30% now the last 6 or so years showed rapid
degradation, hence the Auroral displays well into the mid
latitudes, ya dumb fuck!

Begging the question. You cannot support your claim by citing your claim.

https://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Earth-dipole-moment.jpg

Post by AlleyCat
The data they cite is from satellites that had only been in orbit
for less than 3 years...

And before that there were no satellites, is that your final answer,
troll?

Post by AlleyCat
...and if you trace back to the article they cite, there is no
mention of "5%"

Liar!
"Previously, researchers estimated the field was weakening about 5
percent per century, but the new data revealed the field is actually
weakening at 5 percent per decade, or 10 times faster than thought.
As such, rather than the full flip occurring in about 2,000 years,
as was predicted, the new data suggest it could happen sooner."

"5 percent per decade" doesn't come from the Scientific article you
cited above. It comes from a CBS News article that you haven't
previously cited.
And this new cite claims "5 percent per decade", not 5% annually.
You're really bad at this.

You may be starting to realize we're being lied to by our lamestream
media again, who knew...

https://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Earth-dipole-moment.jpg

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
FEBRUARY 15, 2019
Ancient Earth’s Weakened Magnetic Field May Have Driven Mass Extinction
When our planet’s magnetosphere nearly disappeared 565 million
years ago, it may have almost taken all life with it
Some 565 million years ago, life on Earth dodged a bullet. The
magnetosphere—the magnetic field that surrounds our planet like a
protective shield—had degraded to its lowest intensity ever,
according to a study published January 28 in Nature Geoscience.
Stripped of this shielding, Earth could have been blasted by
atmosphere-eroding outbursts from the sun, gradually losing most
of its air and water until it became as dry and desolate as
present-day Mars.
Instead, deep in the planet’s interior an event was taking place
that would help the magnetosphere rebound, according to the
study’s authors. Earth’s liquid-iron inner core crystallized, a
process geophysicists call “nucleation.” Once solid, the rotating
core acted as a whirling dynamo, strengthening the protective
electromagnetic bubble that wrapped around Earth, staving off
planet-wide devastation. That, in turn, could have set the stage
for the Cambrian explosion, an event approximately 541 million
years ago in which the biosphere suddenly experienced the
greatest evolutionary expansion in the planet’s history.
SHIELDS DOWN The weakened magnetic field Tarduno and his
colleagues discovered roughly coincided with the end-Ediacaran
extinction around 542 million years ago—a mass die-off of
primitive, sessile, sea-dwelling organisms that preceded the
Cambrian explosion. In 2016 Carlo Doglioni, a geologist at
Sapienza University of Rome, proposed the Cambrian’s profusion of
new life-forms took place in part because of the magnetosphere’s
growing strength. “The magnetic dipole was increasing after the
Ediacaran,” Doglioni says. “We have a good, thick atmosphere that
is protecting us from ionizing radiation because we have a good,
strong magnetic field.” Fossil evidence suggests the organisms
that endured the end-Ediacaran extinction survived by burrowing
into the seafloor—a trait not shared by the immobile Ediacaran
period biota that died out. As for the actual culprits in the
killings, a 2016 study from Joseph Meert, a geologist at the
University of Florida, blames harmful ultraviolet light and
cosmic radiation that bathed the surface after passing through
ancient Earth’s weakened magnetic field and thinning atmosphere.
“When the shields went down, the Ediacaran organisms went
extinct, clearing the ecological space for the later Cambrian
explosion,” he says.

No mention of "30%".

No reason for them to report honestly, look at your rampantly
denialistic attitude.

You cited them to support YOUR claim of 30%.
Now you're claiming your own chosen support is lying?

https://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Earth-dipole-moment.jpg

Post by AlleyCat
Etc.
Hint: when someone provides masses of text...

Hint - when you REFUSE to read the very citations you demanded...

Post by AlleyCat
...it's obvious that the text they're providing doesn't actually
provide the support they claim.

It's obvious you are a denialist - does that shilling pay well?

Denialist of what exactly?

https://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Earth-dipole-moment.jpg

Lil-man-ball

2024-04-15 20:56:43 UTC

On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 13:03:09 -0700

Post by Alan
So your contention (do you know what that means in this context?) is
that something that was changing at approximately 0.063% per year
suddenly started changing at about 1% per year; at factor of 16 times
faster?

https://twitter.com/CPoppino/status/1776384293268590834/photo/1

Alan

2024-04-15 21:00:31 UTC

Post by Lil-man-ball
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 13:03:09 -0700

https://twitter.com/CPoppino/status/1776384293268590834/photo/1

Oh, look!

YACWAS (yet another chart without a source)...

...and then there's the whole issue of the extrapolation being entirely
fanciful.

'In the past 200 years, Earth’s magnetic field has weakened about nine
percent on a global average. Some people cite this as “evidence” a pole
reversal is imminent, but scientists have no reason to believe so. In
fact, paleomagnetic studies show the field is about as strong as it’s
been in the past 100,000 years, and is twice as intense as its
million-year average. While some scientists estimate the field’s
strength might completely decay in about 1,300 years, the current
weakening could stop at any time.'

<https://science.nasa.gov/science-research/earth-science/flip-flop-why-variations-in-earths-magnetic-field-arent-causing-todays-climate-change/>

I know, I know...

"Deep state!"

"Conspiracy!"

"Chem trails!"

😉

Lil-man-ball

2024-04-15 21:07:36 UTC

On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 14:00:31 -0700

Post by Alan
Oh, look!
YACWAS (yet another chart without a source)...

https://twitter.com/CPoppino/status/1776384293268590834/photo/1

=

https://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Earth-dipole-moment.jpg

LOL!

Alan

2024-04-15 21:14:13 UTC

Post by Lil-man-ball
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 14:00:31 -0700

Post by Alan
Oh, look!
YACWAS (yet another chart without a source)...

https://twitter.com/CPoppino/status/1776384293268590834/photo/1
=
https://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Earth-dipole-moment.jpg

No.. ...it does not.

Lil-man-ball

2024-04-15 21:42:35 UTC

On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 14:14:13 -0700

Post by Lil-man-ball
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 14:00:31 -0700

Post by Alan
Oh, look!
YACWAS (yet another chart without a source)...

https://twitter.com/CPoppino/status/1776384293268590834/photo/1
=
https://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Earth-dipole-moment.jpg

No.. ...it does not.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_magnetic_field

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_magnetic_field#/media/File:Geomagnetic_axial_dipole_strength.svg

In July 2020 scientists report that analysis of simulations and a
recent observational field model show that maximum rates of directional
change of Earth's magnetic field reached ~10° per year – almost 100
times faster than current changes and 10 times faster than previously
thought.

Alan

2024-04-15 22:46:19 UTC

Post by Lil-man-ball
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 14:14:13 -0700

Post by Lil-man-ball
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 14:00:31 -0700

Post by Alan
Oh, look!
YACWAS (yet another chart without a source)...

https://twitter.com/CPoppino/status/1776384293268590834/photo/1
=
https://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Earth-dipole-moment.jpg

No.. ...it does not.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_magnetic_field
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_magnetic_field#/media/File:Geomagnetic_axial_dipole_strength.svg
In July 2020 scientists report that analysis of simulations and a
recent observational field model show that maximum rates of directional
change of Earth's magnetic field reached ~10° per year – almost 100
times faster than current changes and 10 times faster than previously
thought.

And yet, the source that they cite says "can change", not "IS changing".

'Simulations show magnetic field can change 10 times faster than
previously thought'

<https://phys.org/news/2020-07-simulations-magnetic-field-faster-previously.html#google_vignette>

'Their study, published in Nature Communications, shows that changes in
the direction of Earth's magnetic field reached rates that are up to 10
times larger than the fastest currently reported variations of up to one
degree per year.'

So they're saying that some time in the PAST, the field might have been
changing at 10 degrees per year.

And from the other source they cite:

'Remarkably, maximum rates of directional change reach ~10° yr−1,
typically during times of decreasing field strength, almost 100 times
faster than current changes.'

Now I realize you're intellectually challenged, but...

...can you tell me what 10° per year divided by 100 might be?

:-)

Lil-man-ball

2024-04-15 22:48:09 UTC

On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 15:46:19 -0700

Post by Alan
Now I realize

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_magnetic_field#/media/File:Geomagnetic_axial_dipole_strength.svg

Here's the other 250 year run chart, it's even worse!

https://twitter.com/CPoppino/status/1776384293268590834/photo/1

And:

https://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Earth-dipole-moment.jpg

Now we're seeing a 9,000 year run!

Mercy!

Your arse is in shreds, chucklenuts.

Alan

2024-04-15 22:48:27 UTC

Post by Lil-man-ball
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 15:46:19 -0700

Post by Alan
Now I realize

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_magnetic_field#/media/File:Geomagnetic_axial_dipole_strength.svg
Here's the other 250 year run chart, it's even worse!
https://twitter.com/CPoppino/status/1776384293268590834/photo/1
https://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Earth-dipole-moment.jpg
Now we're seeing a 9,000 year run!
Mercy!
Your arse is in shreds, chucklenuts.

Do you think posting the same thing again...

...after you've been rebutted on each point...

...do you think that makes you look clever?

Dhu on Gate

2024-04-16 00:04:29 UTC

Post by Lil-man-ball
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 15:46:19 -0700

Post by Alan
Now I realize

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_magnetic_field#/media/File:Geomagnetic_axial_dipole_strength.svg
Here's the other 250 year run chart, it's even worse!
https://twitter.com/CPoppino/status/1776384293268590834/photo/1
https://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Earth-dipole-moment.jpg
Now we're seeing a 9,000 year run!
Mercy!
Your arse is in shreds, chucklenuts.

Do you think posting the same thing again...
...after you've been rebutted on each point...
...do you think that makes you look clever?

No. It make U look like an idiot who has has

Post by Alan
JUST<

discovered the photons can leak out both ends
of a [micro|tele|gyro|flouro]scope.

Dhu

--
Je suis Canadien. Ce n'est pas Francais ou Anglais.
C'est une esp`ece de sauvage: ne obliviscaris, vix ea nostra voco;-)
Duncan Patton a Campbell

R Kym Horsell

2024-04-16 06:28:46 UTC

Post by Lil-man-ball
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 13:03:09 -0700

https://twitter.com/CPoppino/status/1776384293268590834/photo/1

Oh, look!
YACWAS (yet another chart without a source)...
...and then there's the whole issue of the extrapolation being entirely
fanciful.

...

Such stuff has been shot down for 30y on AGW fora. Everything from
sunspots to anut fanny's parasole has been offered up as an alleged
alternative to manmade GHG.

But none of them pass the basic numer tests.

If it is the case that X causes Y then you can take data for X and Y,
chop it into 3 parts by dates and use the middle bit to estimate how Y
depends on X. Then you can show in the first and third parts of the data
the same model works exactly.

If you do that with amt CO2 and avg global temps you get 2 curves that are
pretty close across the whole data.

If you do it with e.g. cosmic rays (detected by 100s of ground stations
since the 1950s when veryone gots skert by nookyolar wepins) you get
a big belly laugh as it fails.

<kym.massbus.org/COSMIC>.

Cosmic rays were once proposed as "the" answer for AGW. Supposedly
more cosmic rays would form nuclii for water condensation in the upper atm
and create more clouds. The diff between eras with more and fewer clouds
would be seen in the av global temps. Unfortunately not only does
the data not work (see the plot) but in the lab they (CCERN) couldnt get
the theory to work out either.

In this case cosmic rays are a proxy for the earth's magnetic field.
If cosmic rays dont work then we can be pretty sure the earth's magnetic
field might look pretty as a graph but curve fitting is not predicting.

--
kaggle.com/kymhorsell1

Lil-man-ball

2024-04-16 15:41:17 UTC

On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 06:28:46 -0000 (UTC)

Post by Lil-man-ball
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 13:03:09 -0700

Post by Alan
So your contention (do you know what that means in this context?)
is that something that was changing at approximately 0.063% per
year suddenly started changing at about 1% per year; at factor of
16 times faster?

https://twitter.com/CPoppino/status/1776384293268590834/photo/1

Oh, look!
YACWAS (yet another chart without a source)...
...and then there's the whole issue of the extrapolation being
entirely fanciful.

Wrongo, dick doctor, now learn up before you make an arse of yourself
again:

https://ia803200.us.archive.org/11/items/mdocs/Books/The%20Next%20End%20of%20the%20World%20-%20The%20Rebirth%20of%20Catastrophism%20by%20Ben%20Davidson%20%282021%29.pdf

The sun shines down on the Earth with life-giving light that looks yellow and white as it
crosses the sky, but one day that will change. Dust, gas, and plasma will begin to
accumulate in the sun’s atmosphere, causing a dimming to a reddish hue. When the sun
darkens almost black from accumulation, the light and solar plasma cannot escape, and
the energetic pressure inside the solar atmosphere grows. The pressure eventually
overcomes the outer shell, erupting in a micronova.
The initial eruption will produce a bright flash of visible, UV and x-ray light, which may
thermally and energetically destroy parts of the biosphere. This is the burning aspect
described by the Buddhist Sermon of the Seven Sons. This phase will not last for very long,
a few minutes at most or even possibly just a few seconds. For the next 4-20 hours (until
the micronova shockwave arrives at Earth), energetic protons and electrons will be
bombarding the upper atmosphere, delivering an incredible excess of electricity.
Ambient atmospheric electricity, telluric currents, and atmospheric pressure cells
connected to the global electric circuit will all be amplified.
When the shockwave arrives, it will be a long impact, hours to days to even weeks. At first
the shockwave will be comprised mostly of plasma, accelerated to high speeds, which
would induce electrical disruptions on Earth that would destroy every power grid, create
more-unstable atmospheric electricity conditions, and could even cause a sun-facing
magnetic field collapse, bringing an arc discharge (similar to a magnetar burst) from the
sky to the ground (pictured). It will also begin to bring the isotopes
of the nova.

The bombardment will transition from plasma to dust and other molecules
as the second component of the wave arrives, which will have the
isotopes of heavy elements in the nova attached to the dust, and which
will present itself in vastly non-homogenous ways. If you are facing
the sun when the plasma arrives, it may be nighttime when the dust and
heavier components hit. The turning of the Earth through the phases of
the shockwave impact means that the isotope distribution is different
across the globe. This is missed in all dating techniques. At this
point, the dust begins to block out the sky, and it lingers in the
inner solar system while the larger pieces of the shell arrive- the
impactors. Silicate material like glass and congealed/cooled plasma and
dust that have agglomerated in the shell expansion will arrive at the
end of the shockwave, and the bombardment here likely plays a key role
in how bad of a disaster the Earth actually faces. If larger pieces hit
the Earth, it could turn a bad event into a cataclysm.

5.1 What is the Solar Micronova?
Disaster (noun): Combination of dis (ill, negative, pejorative) and aster (star).
The sun shines down on the Earth with life-giving light that looks yellow and white as it
crosses the sky, but one day that will change. Dust, gas, and plasma will begin to
accumulate in the sun’s atmosphere, causing a dimming to a reddish hue. When the sun
darkens almost black from accumulation, the light and solar plasma cannot escape, and
the energetic pressure inside the solar atmosphere grows. The pressure eventually
overcomes the outer shell, erupting in a micronova.
The initial eruption will produce a bright flash of visible, UV and x-ray light, which may
thermally and energetically destroy parts of the biosphere. This is the burning aspect
described by the Buddhist Sermon of the Seven Sons. This phase will not last for very long,
a few minutes at most or even possibly just a few seconds. For the next 4-20 hours (until
the micronova shockwave arrives at Earth), energetic protons and electrons will be
bombarding the upper atmosphere, delivering an incredible excess of electricity.
Ambient atmospheric electricity, telluric currents, and atmospheric pressure cells
connected to the global electric circuit will all be amplified.
When the shockwave arrives, it will be a long impact, hours to days to even weeks. At first
the shockwave will be comprised mostly of plasma, accelerated to high speeds, which

would induce electrical disruptions on Earth that would destroy every power grid, create
more-unstable atmospheric electricity conditions, and could even cause a sun-facing
magnetic field collapse, bringing an arc discharge (similar to a magnetar burst) from the
sky to the ground (pictured). It will also begin to bring the isotopes of the nova.
The bombardment will transition from plasma to dust and other molecules as the second
component of the wave arrives, which will have the isotopes of heavy elements in the
nova attached to the dust, and which will present itself in vastly non-homogenous ways.
If you are facing the sun when the plasma arrives, it may be nighttime when the dust and
heavier components hit. The turning of the Earth through the phases of the shockwave
impact means that the isotope distribution is different across the globe. This is missed in all
dating techniques.
At this point, the dust begins to block out the sky, and it lingers in the inner solar system
while the larger pieces of the shell arrive- the impactors. Silicate material like glass and
congealed/cooled plasma and dust that have agglomerated in the shell expansion will
arrive at the end of the shockwave, and the bombardment here likely plays a key role in
how bad of a disaster the Earth actually faces. If larger pieces hit the Earth, it could turn
a bad event into a cataclysm.

Alan

2024-04-16 16:10:01 UTC

Post by Lil-man-ball
On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 06:28:46 -0000 (UTC)

Post by Lil-man-ball
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 13:03:09 -0700

Post by Alan
So your contention (do you know what that means in this context?)
is that something that was changing at approximately 0.063% per
year suddenly started changing at about 1% per year; at factor of
16 times faster?

https://twitter.com/CPoppino/status/1776384293268590834/photo/1

Oh, look!
YACWAS (yet another chart without a source)...
...and then there's the whole issue of the extrapolation being
entirely fanciful.

Wrongo, dick doctor, now learn up before you make an arse of yourself
https://ia803200.us.archive.org/11/items/mdocs/Books/The%20Next%20End%20of%20the%20World%20-%20The%20Rebirth%20of%20Catastrophism%20by%20Ben%20Davidson%20%282021%29.pdf

Literally NONE of what follows applies to our sun.

Micronovae are a phenomenon of white dwarf stars in a binary system with
a companion star.

Post by Lil-man-ball
The sun shines down on the Earth with life-giving light that looks yellow and white as it
crosses the sky, but one day that will change. Dust, gas, and plasma will begin to
accumulate in the sun’s atmosphere, causing a dimming to a reddish hue. When the sun
darkens almost black from accumulation, the light and solar plasma cannot escape, and
the energetic pressure inside the solar atmosphere grows. The pressure eventually
overcomes the outer shell, erupting in a micronova.
The initial eruption will produce a bright flash of visible, UV and x-ray light, which may
thermally and energetically destroy parts of the biosphere. This is the burning aspect
described by the Buddhist Sermon of the Seven Sons. This phase will not last for very long,
a few minutes at most or even possibly just a few seconds. For the next 4-20 hours (until
the micronova shockwave arrives at Earth), energetic protons and electrons will be
bombarding the upper atmosphere, delivering an incredible excess of electricity.
Ambient atmospheric electricity, telluric currents, and atmospheric pressure cells
connected to the global electric circuit will all be amplified.
When the shockwave arrives, it will be a long impact, hours to days to even weeks. At first
the shockwave will be comprised mostly of plasma, accelerated to high speeds, which
would induce electrical disruptions on Earth that would destroy every power grid, create
more-unstable atmospheric electricity conditions, and could even cause a sun-facing
magnetic field collapse, bringing an arc discharge (similar to a magnetar burst) from the
sky to the ground (pictured). It will also begin to bring the isotopes of the nova.
The bombardment will transition from plasma to dust and other molecules
as the second component of the wave arrives, which will have the
isotopes of heavy elements in the nova attached to the dust, and which
will present itself in vastly non-homogenous ways. If you are facing
the sun when the plasma arrives, it may be nighttime when the dust and
heavier components hit. The turning of the Earth through the phases of
the shockwave impact means that the isotope distribution is different
across the globe. This is missed in all dating techniques. At this
point, the dust begins to block out the sky, and it lingers in the
inner solar system while the larger pieces of the shell arrive- the
impactors. Silicate material like glass and congealed/cooled plasma and
dust that have agglomerated in the shell expansion will arrive at the
end of the shockwave, and the bombardment here likely plays a key role
in how bad of a disaster the Earth actually faces. If larger pieces hit
the Earth, it could turn a bad event into a cataclysm.
5.1 What is the Solar Micronova?
Disaster (noun): Combination of dis (ill, negative, pejorative) and aster (star).
The sun shines down on the Earth with life-giving light that looks yellow and white as it
crosses the sky, but one day that will change. Dust, gas, and plasma will begin to
accumulate in the sun’s atmosphere, causing a dimming to a reddish hue. When the sun
darkens almost black from accumulation, the light and solar plasma cannot escape, and
the energetic pressure inside the solar atmosphere grows. The pressure eventually
overcomes the outer shell, erupting in a micronova.
The initial eruption will produce a bright flash of visible, UV and x-ray light, which may
thermally and energetically destroy parts of the biosphere. This is the burning aspect
described by the Buddhist Sermon of the Seven Sons. This phase will not last for very long,
a few minutes at most or even possibly just a few seconds. For the next 4-20 hours (until
the micronova shockwave arrives at Earth), energetic protons and electrons will be
bombarding the upper atmosphere, delivering an incredible excess of electricity.
Ambient atmospheric electricity, telluric currents, and atmospheric pressure cells
connected to the global electric circuit will all be amplified.
When the shockwave arrives, it will be a long impact, hours to days to even weeks. At first
the shockwave will be comprised mostly of plasma, accelerated to high speeds, which
would induce electrical disruptions on Earth that would destroy every power grid, create
more-unstable atmospheric electricity conditions, and could even cause a sun-facing
magnetic field collapse, bringing an arc discharge (similar to a magnetar burst) from the
sky to the ground (pictured). It will also begin to bring the isotopes of the nova.
The bombardment will transition from plasma to dust and other molecules as the second
component of the wave arrives, which will have the isotopes of heavy elements in the
nova attached to the dust, and which will present itself in vastly non-homogenous ways.
If you are facing the sun when the plasma arrives, it may be nighttime when the dust and
heavier components hit. The turning of the Earth through the phases of the shockwave
impact means that the isotope distribution is different across the globe. This is missed in all
dating techniques.
At this point, the dust begins to block out the sky, and it lingers in the inner solar system
while the larger pieces of the shell arrive- the impactors. Silicate material like glass and
congealed/cooled plasma and dust that have agglomerated in the shell expansion will
arrive at the end of the shockwave, and the bombardment here likely plays a key role in
how bad of a disaster the Earth actually faces. If larger pieces hit the Earth, it could turn
a bad event into a cataclysm.

Lil-man-ball

2024-04-16 16:39:26 UTC

On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 09:10:01 -0700

Post by Lil-man-ball
On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 06:28:46 -0000 (UTC)

Post by Lil-man-ball
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 13:03:09 -0700

Post by Alan
So your contention (do you know what that means in this
context?) is that something that was changing at approximately
0.063% per year suddenly started changing at about 1% per year;
at factor of 16 times faster?

https://twitter.com/CPoppino/status/1776384293268590834/photo/1

Oh, look!
YACWAS (yet another chart without a source)...
...and then there's the whole issue of the extrapolation being
entirely fanciful.

Wrongo, dick doctor, now learn up before you make an arse of
https://ia803200.us.archive.org/11/items/mdocs/Books/The%20Next%20End%20of%20the%20World%20-%20The%20Rebirth%20of%20Catastrophism%20by%20Ben%20Davidson%20%282021%29.pdf

Literally NONE of what follows applies to our sun.

That's a really stupid denial, even for you.

Post by Alan
Micronovae are a phenomenon of white dwarf stars in a binary system
with a companion star.

Of which many scientists believe we coexist with...just so you know...

Post by Lil-man-ball
The sun shines down on the Earth with life-giving light that looks
yellow and white as it crosses the sky, but one day that will
change. Dust, gas, and plasma will begin to accumulate in the sun’s
atmosphere, causing a dimming to a reddish hue. When the sun
darkens almost black from accumulation, the light and solar plasma
cannot escape, and the energetic pressure inside the solar
atmosphere grows. The pressure eventually overcomes the outer
shell, erupting in a micronova. The initial eruption will produce a
bright flash of visible, UV and x-ray light, which may thermally
and energetically destroy parts of the biosphere. This is the
burning aspect described by the Buddhist Sermon of the Seven Sons.
This phase will not last for very long, a few minutes at most or
even possibly just a few seconds. For the next 4-20 hours (until
the micronova shockwave arrives at Earth), energetic protons and
electrons will be bombarding the upper atmosphere, delivering an
incredible excess of electricity. Ambient atmospheric electricity,
telluric currents, and atmospheric pressure cells connected to the
global electric circuit will all be amplified. When the shockwave
arrives, it will be a long impact, hours to days to even weeks. At
first the shockwave will be comprised mostly of plasma, accelerated
to high speeds, which would induce electrical disruptions on Earth
that would destroy every power grid, create more-unstable
atmospheric electricity conditions, and could even cause a
sun-facing magnetic field collapse, bringing an arc discharge
(similar to a magnetar burst) from the sky to the ground
(pictured). It will also begin to bring the isotopes of the nova.
The bombardment will transition from plasma to dust and other
molecules as the second component of the wave arrives, which will
have the isotopes of heavy elements in the nova attached to the
dust, and which will present itself in vastly non-homogenous ways.
If you are facing the sun when the plasma arrives, it may be
nighttime when the dust and heavier components hit. The turning of
the Earth through the phases of the shockwave impact means that the
isotope distribution is different across the globe. This is missed
in all dating techniques. At this point, the dust begins to block
out the sky, and it lingers in the inner solar system while the
larger pieces of the shell arrive- the impactors. Silicate material
like glass and congealed/cooled plasma and dust that have
agglomerated in the shell expansion will arrive at the end of the
shockwave, and the bombardment here likely plays a key role in how
bad of a disaster the Earth actually faces. If larger pieces hit
the Earth, it could turn a bad event into a cataclysm.
5.1 What is the Solar Micronova?
Disaster (noun): Combination of dis (ill, negative, pejorative) and
aster (star). The sun shines down on the Earth with life-giving
light that looks yellow and white as it crosses the sky, but one
day that will change. Dust, gas, and plasma will begin to
accumulate in the sun’s atmosphere, causing a dimming to a reddish
hue. When the sun darkens almost black from accumulation, the light
and solar plasma cannot escape, and the energetic pressure inside
the solar atmosphere grows. The pressure eventually overcomes the
outer shell, erupting in a micronova. The initial eruption will
produce a bright flash of visible, UV and x-ray light, which may
thermally and energetically destroy parts of the biosphere. This is
the burning aspect described by the Buddhist Sermon of the Seven
Sons. This phase will not last for very long, a few minutes at most
or even possibly just a few seconds. For the next 4-20 hours (until
the micronova shockwave arrives at Earth), energetic protons and
electrons will be bombarding the upper atmosphere, delivering an
incredible excess of electricity. Ambient atmospheric electricity,
telluric currents, and atmospheric pressure cells connected to the
global electric circuit will all be amplified. When the shockwave
arrives, it will be a long impact, hours to days to even weeks. At
first the shockwave will be comprised mostly of plasma, accelerated
to high speeds, which
would induce electrical disruptions on Earth that would destroy
every power grid, create more-unstable atmospheric electricity
conditions, and could even cause a sun-facing magnetic field
collapse, bringing an arc discharge (similar to a magnetar burst)
from the sky to the ground (pictured). It will also begin to bring
the isotopes of the nova. The bombardment will transition from
plasma to dust and other molecules as the second component of the
wave arrives, which will have the isotopes of heavy elements in the
nova attached to the dust, and which will present itself in vastly
non-homogenous ways. If you are facing the sun when the plasma
arrives, it may be nighttime when the dust and heavier components
hit. The turning of the Earth through the phases of the shockwave
impact means that the isotope distribution is different across the
globe. This is missed in all dating techniques. At this point, the
dust begins to block out the sky, and it lingers in the inner solar
system while the larger pieces of the shell arrive- the impactors.
Silicate material like glass and congealed/cooled plasma and dust
that have agglomerated in the shell expansion will arrive at the
end of the shockwave, and the bombardment here likely plays a key
role in how bad of a disaster the Earth actually faces. If larger
pieces hit the Earth, it could turn a bad event into a cataclysm.

https://www.sciencealert.com/our-sun-could-have-been-born-with-a-twin-called-nemesis

A recent model on how stars are formed adds weight to the hypothesis that most – if not all – stars are born in a litter with at least one sibling.

Our own star at the center of the Solar System is probably no exception, and some astronomers suspect that the Sun's estranged twin might be to blame for the death of the dinosaurs.

After analysing data from a radio survey conducted on a dust cloud in the Perseus constellation, two researchers from UC Berkeley and the Harvard-Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory concluded back in 2017 that all Sun-like stars are probably born with a companion.

"We ran a series of statistical models to see if we could account for the relative populations of young single stars and binaries of all separations in the Perseus molecular cloud, and the only model that could reproduce the data was one in which all stars form initially as wide binaries," said UC Berkeley astronomer Steven Stahler in June 2017.

For years, astronomers have wondered if the large number of binary and triple systems of stars in our galaxy are created close to one another, or if they fall in together after they've formed.

The 'born together' hypothesis has been the favorite, and simulations developed in recent decades have shown almost all stars could be born as multiples that often spin away on their own.

Empirical evidence supporting these simulations has been limited, unfortunately, which makes this new work rather exciting.

"Our work is a step forward in understanding both how binaries form and also the role that binaries play in early stellar evolution," said Stahler.

As part of the VLA nascent disk and multiplicity survey (VANDAM for short), the researchers mapped the radio waves leaking out of a dense cocoon of dust about 600 light-years away that contained a whole nursery of young stars.

The VANDAM survey allowed for a census of stars younger than half a million years old called Class 0 stars – mere babies in star terms – and stars a little older between 500,000 years and 1 million years, called Class 1.

Combined with data on the shapes of the surrounding cloud of dust, the scientists found 45 lonely stars, 19 binary star systems, and a further five that contained more than two stars.

While their results predicted all stars were born as binaries, they amended their conclusion to take into account limitations in their model by saying most stars formed inside the dense cores of dust clouds are born with a partner.

"I think we have the strongest evidence to date for such an assertion," said Stahler at the time.

Looking closely at the distances between the stars, the researchers found all binaries separated by a gap of 500 AU or more were Class 0 and lined up with the axis of the egg-shaped cloud surrounding them.

Class 1 stars, on the other hand, tended to be closer together at around 200 AU and weren't aligned with their 'egg's' axis.

"We don't yet know quite what it means, but it isn't random and must say something about the way wide binaries form," said Sarah Sadavoy from the Harvard-Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory.

If most stars are born with a partner, where's ours?

A distance of 500 AU is roughly 0.008 light-years, or a bit under 3 light-days. To put it into perspective, Neptune is about 30 AU away, the Voyager 1 probe is currently just under 140 AU away, and the nearest known star Proxima Centauri is 268,770 AU away.

So if the Sun has a twin, it's almost certainly not easily visible in our neighborhood.

But there is an hypothesis that our Sun has a twin that likes to swing by every now and then, and stir things up.

Given the name Nemesis, this theoretical trouble maker has been proposed as a reason behind an apparent 27-million-year cycle of extinctions on Earth, including the one that saw off most of the dinosaurs.

An astronomer from the University of California Berkeley named Richard Muller proposed 23 years ago that a red dwarf star 1.5 light-years away could periodically travel through the icy outer limits of our Solar System, stirring up material with its gravity, knocking a few more space boulders our way.

A dim passing star such as a brown dwarf could also explain other anomalies at the fringes of our Solar System, such as the odd, wide orbit of the dwarf planet Sedna.

There's no sign of Nemesis, but a long-lost binary partner for our Sun could fit the bill.

"We are saying, yes, there probably was a Nemesis, a long time ago," said Stahler.

In which case, our Sun would have gathered the lion's share of dust and gas it seems, leaving its twin dark and stunted.

No wonder it's a little pissed off.

Alan

2024-04-16 18:35:38 UTC

On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 06:28:46 -0000 (UTC) R Kym Horsell

Post by Alan
So your contention (do you know what that means in this
context?) is that something that was changing at
approximately 0.063% per year suddenly started changing
at about 1% per year; at factor of 16 times faster?

https://twitter.com/CPoppino/status/1776384293268590834/photo/1

Oh, look!
YACWAS (yet another chart without a source)...
...and then there's the whole issue of the extrapolation
being entirely fanciful.

Literally NONE of what follows applies to our sun.

That's a really stupid denial, even for you.

Post by Alan
Micronovae are a phenomenon of white dwarf stars in a binary
system with a companion star.

Of which many scientists believe we coexist with...just so you
know...

Ummmmmmmm...no.

Even if we did have one, it's not nearly close enough for our sun...

...(which isn't a white dwarf, remember)...

...for our sun to be pulling material from it.

Post by Lil-man-ball
https://www.sciencealert.com/our-sun-could-have-been-born-with-a-twin-called-nemesis
A recent model on how stars are formed adds weight to the hypothesis
that most – if not all – stars are born in a litter with at least one
sibling.

A model that suggests "most" stars are born with a "litter of siblings
is no proof that ours ever did have a companion star.

'This recent study, which involved an examination of WISE data covering
the entire sky in infrared light, found no object the size of Saturn or
larger exists out to a distance of 10,000 astronomical units (au), and
no object larger than Jupiter exists out to 26,000 au. One astronomical
unit equals 93 million miles. Earth is 1 au, and Pluto about 40 au, from
the sun.'

<https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasas-wise-survey-finds-thousands-of-new-stars-but-no-planet-x/>

Binary star systems exist from a few AU to a few hundred AU, doofus.

Lil-man-ball

2024-04-16 21:06:37 UTC

On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:35:38 -0700

On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 06:28:46 -0000 (UTC) R Kym Horsell

Post by Alan
So your contention (do you know what that means in this
context?) is that something that was changing at
approximately 0.063% per year suddenly started changing
at about 1% per year; at factor of 16 times faster?

https://twitter.com/CPoppino/status/1776384293268590834/photo/1

Oh, look!
YACWAS (yet another chart without a source)...
...and then there's the whole issue of the extrapolation
being entirely fanciful.

Literally NONE of what follows applies to our sun.

That's a really stupid denial, even for you.

Post by Alan
Micronovae are a phenomenon of white dwarf stars in a binary
system with a companion star.

Of which many scientists believe we coexist with...just so you know...

Ummmmmmmm...no.
Even if we did have one, it's not nearly close enough for our sun...

You have no proof of that.

Post by Alan
...(which isn't a white dwarf, remember)...

Nor need it be at this stage.

Post by Alan
...for our sun to be pulling material from it.

The galactic current sheet transits the entire galaxy,
coincidentally...not just our sun.

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2021SW002796

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliospheric_current_sheet

https://www.bitchute.com/video/S9lZLY781LmF/

A detailed explanation of what happens to the Earth every 12.5k years
as the solar system passes through the Galactic Current Sheet.

Post by Lil-man-ball
https://www.sciencealert.com/our-sun-could-have-been-born-with-a-twin-called-nemesis
A recent model on how stars are formed adds weight to the
hypothesis that most – if not all – stars are born in a litter with
at least one sibling.

A model that suggests "most" stars are born with a "litter of
siblings is no proof that ours ever did have a companion star.

You have nor offer any proofs or factual rebuttals - ever.

Post by Alan
'This recent study, which involved an examination of WISE data
covering the entire sky in infrared light, found no object the size
of Saturn or larger exists out to a distance of 10,000 astronomical
units (au), and no object larger than Jupiter exists out to 26,000
au. One astronomical unit equals 93 million miles. Earth is 1 au, and
Pluto about 40 au, from the sun.'
<https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasas-wise-survey-finds-thousands-of-new-stars-but-no-planet-x/>
Binary star systems exist from a few AU to a few hundred AU, doofus.

NASA = never a straight answer.

Galactic Current Sheet | Solar System Shift

https://watchers.news/2019/09/22/solar-system-approaching-the-closest-position-to-the-galactic-core-energetic-region-altering-magnetic-fields-of-the-sun-and-all-planets/

Solar system approaching the closest position to the galactic core, energetic region altering magnetic fields of the Sun and all planets
Written by
Jamal S. Shrair
Sunday, September 22, 2019
Updated on
Friday, March 4, 2022 18:26 UTC

Valid and clear observations are showing that the Earth is not the only planet in the solar system undergoing climate change. Growth of the dark spots in Pluto, reports of auroras on Saturn, polar shifts in Uranus and changes in light intensity of Neptune suggests the changes are happening in the entire solar system.

Another concrete evidence of the solar change comes from Pluto. Pluto resides in the icy outskirts of the solar system near a giant shell of astronomical bodies known as the Oort Cloud. Although Pluto resides in the coolest region of the solar system, it is heating up. Specifically, Pluto’s atmospheric pressure has increased by 300 percent, which is more than any other planet in the solar system.

Even more paradoxical to mainstream scientists, Pluto’s atmosphere is becoming denser as it travels farther away from the Sun. This shows of course, that Pluto is at the forefront of a high energy region of the galaxy that the solar system is beginning to reside in.

Thus, without a doubt, the changes are taking place throughout the whole solar system. This fact is supported by additional data. For instance, the increase in the strength of the Sun’s magnetic field is one of the most obvious evidence for the dramatic shift that is taking place within our solar system.

According to, a study by Mike Lockwood at Rutherford Appleton National Laboratories, in California, the Sun’s magnetic field has increased by 230 percent within the 20th century alone. The energetic changes in the Sun radiate outward through solar wind, thereby increasing the charge of interstellar space.

Another piece of evidence in favor of solar change is the sudden rise in galactic stardust. Ulysses, a space probe, has been monitoring the amount of stardust flowing through the solar system since 1992.

Image credit: Olaf Frohn

The Sun’s magnetic field impacts how much stardust drifts through the solar system. The magnetic field attracts more stardust as it strengthens. The solar system is experiencing an overflow of stardust. As the Sun’s magnetic field grows in strength, it attracts more dust.

Observations showed that the amount of stardust in the solar system has increased threefold since 2003, which is heating up interstellar space. However, what is puzzling scientists is the amount of stardust that continues to flood the solar system even during solar minimum. This is in itself a sufficient proof showing the misunderstanding of our own star.

The evidence that the entire solar system is warming up is overwhelming. And, institutional scientists are lost between solar reality based on observational data and loyalty to the standard solar model.

Nonetheless, one thing is absolutely certain… the physical reality of the Sun is not understood by astrophysicists and astronomers. Due to this misunderstanding, climate science is currently ruled by politicians and figures with very low intellectual capability.

The misunderstanding of the Sun had and continues to have devastating consequences on our scientific and economic development.

I have been arguing aggressively for many years, that the Sun is
misunderstood. I have presented huge material evidence against the
current dogma, based on, theoretical notions and particularly on,
observational data, which were collected by modern space instruments.
Those data refute the most fundamental hypotheses of the standard solar
model (The standard solar dogma). Furthermore, I have clearly shown in
my arguments that the current model contradicts all the laws of
thermodynamics. More importantly, I have stated many times, that I can
present the alternative solar model, that has the ability to provide
true explanations, to all solar observations and phenomena, including
those that are now considered mysteries. On top of all the above,
Shrair Solar Model is the correct blueprint to replicate the primary
energy source of the Sun.

Phil Hendry's Chop shop

2024-04-13 19:04:14 UTC

On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 10:34:47 -0700

Post by Alan
That's actually WHY you need to look at trends over a long baseline.

This long enough for ya, climate change hoaxer?

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/geomagnetic-excursions-interglacial-termination-abrupt-climate-change.384098/

In summary, there is a significant amount of evidence that supports the
idea that geomagnetic excursions are responsible for the abrupt climate
changes seen during the Younger Dryas period. This correlation has been
observed in various studies, and it is believed that a cyclic external
event is causing these changes. The frequency of the forcing event is
around 12,000 years and is also responsible for smaller events known as
geomagnetic jerks. However, it is important to note that the external
forcing event's impact is dependent on several factors such as the
earth's axis tilt, timing of perihelion, and the distribution of
continents and ice sheets. Additionally, there is evidence of a
correlation between geomagnetic field intensity and cold climate events.

The Paleoclimatic data shows that the Younger Dryas cooling event occurred over 15 years in three 5 years steps. The entire Younger Dryas cooling event was complete in 40 years. The planet cooled from interglacial warm to within 25% of the glacial temperatures. Temperature in the North America cooled by around 18F. What is interesting is the Younger Dryas is one of a series of similar cooling events, including the termination of past interglacial periods. During the glacial period the external forcing event has less affect on the geomagnetic field and planetary temperature as the planet is already cold and vast regions of the planet's surface is covered with ice sheets which insulate the planet's surface from the cyclic forcing event, and planetary temperature is already very cold so increased GCR has less effect. The affect of the external cyclic event that is forcing the geomagnetic event it appears is dependent on the earth’s axis tilt at the time of the event, timing of perihelion, the eccentricity of the earth’s orbit, the distribution of the continents on the surface of the planet, and the area of the planet’s surface covered by ice sheets. http://www.paleomag.net/members/qingsongliu/References/EPSL/Thouveny%20excursions%20since%20400%20ka%20EPSL%202004.pdf

Reference:
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/geomagnetic-excursions-interglacial-termination-abrupt-climate-change.384098/

Alan

2024-04-13 20:56:18 UTC

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 10:34:47 -0700

Post by Alan
That's actually WHY you need to look at trends over a long baseline.

This long enough for ya, climate change hoaxer?
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/geomagnetic-excursions-interglacial-termination-abrupt-climate-change.384098/
In summary, there is a significant amount of evidence that supports the
idea that geomagnetic excursions are responsible for the abrupt climate
changes seen during the Younger Dryas period. This correlation has been
observed in various studies, and it is believed that a cyclic external
event is causing these changes. The frequency of the forcing event is
around 12,000 years and is also responsible for smaller events known as
geomagnetic jerks. However, it is important to note that the external
forcing event's impact is dependent on several factors such as the
earth's axis tilt, timing of perihelion, and the distribution of
continents and ice sheets. Additionally, there is evidence of a
correlation between geomagnetic field intensity and cold climate events.
The Paleoclimatic data shows that the Younger Dryas cooling event occurred over 15 years in three 5 years steps. The entire Younger Dryas cooling event was complete in 40 years. The planet cooled from interglacial warm to within 25% of the glacial temperatures. Temperature in the North America cooled by around 18F. What is interesting is the Younger Dryas is one of a series of similar cooling events, including the termination of past interglacial periods. During the glacial period the external forcing event has less affect on the geomagnetic field and planetary temperature as the planet is already cold and vast regions of the planet's surface is covered with ice sheets which insulate the planet's surface from the cyclic forcing event, and planetary temperature is already very cold so increased GCR has less effect. The affect of the external cyclic event that is forcing the geomagnetic event it appears is dependent on the earth’s axis tilt at the time of the event, timing of perihelion, the eccentricity of the earth’s orbit, the distribution of the continents on the surface of the planet, and the area of the planet’s surface covered by ice sheets. http://www.paleomag.net/members/qingsongliu/References/EPSL/Thouveny%20excursions%20since%20400%20ka%20EPSL%202004.pdf
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/geomagnetic-excursions-interglacial-termination-abrupt-climate-change.384098/

Why do you think "

Phil Hendry's Chop shop

2024-04-13 21:44:16 UTC

On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 13:56:18 -0700

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 10:34:47 -0700

Post by Alan
That's actually WHY you need to look at trends over a long
baseline.

This long enough for ya, climate change hoaxer?
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/geomagnetic-excursions-interglacial-termination-abrupt-climate-change.384098/
In summary, there is a significant amount of evidence that supports
the idea that geomagnetic excursions are responsible for the abrupt
climate changes seen during the Younger Dryas period. This
correlation has been observed in various studies, and it is
believed that a cyclic external event is causing these changes. The
frequency of the forcing event is around 12,000 years and is also
responsible for smaller events known as geomagnetic jerks. However,
it is important to note that the external forcing event's impact is
dependent on several factors such as the earth's axis tilt, timing
of perihelion, and the distribution of continents and ice sheets.
Additionally, there is evidence of a correlation between
geomagnetic field intensity and cold climate events.
The Paleoclimatic data shows that the Younger Dryas cooling event
occurred over 15 years in three 5 years steps. The entire Younger
Dryas cooling event was complete in 40 years. The planet cooled
from interglacial warm to within 25% of the glacial temperatures.
Temperature in the North America cooled by around 18F. What is
interesting is the Younger Dryas is one of a series of similar
cooling events, including the termination of past interglacial
periods. During the glacial period the external forcing event has
less affect on the geomagnetic field and planetary temperature as
the planet is already cold and vast regions of the planet's surface
is covered with ice sheets which insulate the planet's surface from
the cyclic forcing event, and planetary temperature is already very
cold so increased GCR has less effect. The affect of the external
cyclic event that is forcing the geomagnetic event it appears is
dependent on the earth’s axis tilt at the time of the event, timing
of perihelion, the eccentricity of the earth’s orbit, the
distribution of the continents on the surface of the planet, and
the area of the planet’s surface covered by ice sheets.
http://www.paleomag.net/members/qingsongliu/References/EPSL/Thouveny%20excursions%20since%20400%20ka%20EPSL%202004.pdf
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/geomagnetic-excursions-interglacial-termination-abrupt-climate-change.384098/

Why do you think "Saul" is any kind of authority, doofus?

Why do you play "shoot the messenger" in lieu of actual topical
commentary, turdlicker?

Phil Hendry's Chop shop

2024-04-13 18:34:25 UTC

On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 08:55:42 -0700

Post by AlleyCat
So WHY are the chicken shit Chicken Littles screeching that we're
all going to die soon?
https://noaadata.apps.nsidc.org/NOAA/G02135/south/daily/images/
https://i.imgur.com/Mz2JYjg.png

Because two data points don't represent a trend, loser.

Your denial of hard reality is clearly a lifestyle decision, you
subhuman tick.

Alan

2024-04-13 20:56:32 UTC

Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 08:55:42 -0700

Post by AlleyCat
So WHY are the chicken shit Chicken Littles screeching that we're
all going to die soon?
https://noaadata.apps.nsidc.org/NOAA/G02135/south/daily/images/
https://i.imgur.com/Mz2JYjg.png

Because two data points don't represent a trend, loser.

Your denial of hard reality is clearly a lifestyle decision, you
subhuman tick.

I didn't deny anything, doofus.

Phil Hendry's Chop shop

2024-04-13 21:44:33 UTC

On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 13:56:32 -0700

Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 08:55:42 -0700

Post by AlleyCat
So WHY are the chicken shit Chicken Littles screeching that we're
all going to die soon?
https://noaadata.apps.nsidc.org/NOAA/G02135/south/daily/images/
https://i.imgur.com/Mz2JYjg.png

Because two data points don't represent a trend, loser.

Your denial of hard reality is clearly a lifestyle decision, you
subhuman tick.

I didn't deny

Liar.

Phil Hendry's Chop shop

2024-04-13 21:51:21 UTC

On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 13:56:32 -0700

Post by Alan
I didn't

Another solar micronova epochal site found close to your home:

https://ro.uow.edu.au/era/73/

Australia’s oldest human remains, found at Lake Mungo, include the
world’s oldest ritual ochre burial (Mungo III) and the first recorded
cremation (Mungo I). Until now, the importance of these finds has been
constrained by limited chronologies and palaeoenvironmental
information. Mungo III, the source of the world’s oldest human
mitochondrial DNA, has been variously estimated at 30 thousand years
(kyr) old, 42–45 kyr old and 62 +/- 6 kyr old. while radiocarbon
estimates placed theMungo I cremation near 20–26 kyr ago. Here we
report a new series of 25 optical ages showing that both burials
occurred at 40 +/- 2 kyr ago and that humans were present at Lake Mungo
by 50–46 kyr ago, synchronously with, or soon after, initial occupation
of northern and western Australia. Stratigraphic evidence indicates
fluctuations between lake-full and drier conditions from 50 to 40 kyr
ago, simultaneously with increased dust deposition, human arrival and
continent-wide extinction of the megafauna. This was followed by
sustained aridity between 40 and 30 kyr ago. This new chronology
corrects previous estimates for human burials at this important site
and provides a new picture of Homo sapiens adapting to deteriorating
climate in the world’s driest inhabited continent.

https://ia803200.us.archive.org/11/items/mdocs/Books/The%20Next%20End%20of%20the%20World%20-%20The%20Rebirth%20of%20Catastrophism%20by%20Ben%20Davidson%20%282021%29.pdf

Earth has magnetic reversals and magnetic excursions. Reversals include a flip of Earth’s
magnetic field after long (100,000s of years) epochs, while excursions are rapid flips and
flips-back of the magnetic pole. Both events include an intensity minimum during the flip
that allows space energy to penetrate into the Earth system. Excursions occur much more
frequently than full reversals, somewhere around 10,000 - 15,000 years apart on average.
While some researchers believe the cycle to be relatively exact, everything from ~11,500
years (Walker) to exactly 12,068 years (Douglas Vogt), to 21,000 - 26,000 years
(axial/apsidal precession catastrophism theory), the geologic evidence available today
tells a slightly more complex story of the processes involved.
In modern science, there are some recognized events that paint a scary picture of the
near-term future. Excursions have taken place ~12,000 - 13,000 years ago (Gothenburg),
~24,000 - 28,000 years ago (Lake Mungo), ~33,000 - 37,000 years ago (Mono Lake),
~41,000 - 46,000 years ago (Laschamp), ~60,000 years ago (Greenland/Vostok), and
~72,000 years ago (Toba). A rapid look at the most recent events shows ~12,000 to 13,000
years between them, meaning that the cycle is approximately due to reset now. While
the exact dating of these events has endured considerable disagreement (as evidenced
by the uncertainty of time in which they are supposed to have occurred) they tell a story
of a recurring magnetic change on our planet, one that matches other cycle timelines
and the evidence of disaste

Alan

2024-04-13 23:16:02 UTC

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 13:56:32 -0700

Post by Alan
I didn't

https://ro.uow.edu.au/era/73/
Australia’s oldest human remains, found at Lake Mungo, include the
world’s oldest ritual ochre burial (Mungo III) and the first recorded
cremation (Mungo I). Until now, the importance of these finds has been
constrained by limited chronologies and palaeoenvironmental
information. Mungo III, the source of the world’s oldest human
mitochondrial DNA, has been variously estimated at 30 thousand years
(kyr) old, 42–45 kyr old and 62 +/- 6 kyr old. while radiocarbon
estimates placed theMungo I cremation near 20–26 kyr ago. Here we
report a new series of 25 optical ages showing that both burials
occurred at 40 +/- 2 kyr ago and that humans were present at Lake Mungo
by 50–46 kyr ago, synchronously with, or soon after, initial occupation
of northern and western Australia. Stratigraphic evidence indicates
fluctuations between lake-full and drier conditions from 50 to 40 kyr
ago, simultaneously with increased dust deposition, human arrival and
continent-wide extinction of the megafauna. This was followed by
sustained aridity between 40 and 30 kyr ago. This new chronology
corrects previous estimates for human burials at this important site
and provides a new picture of Homo sapiens adapting to deteriorating
climate in the world’s driest inhabited continent.

Micronovas are phenomenon of white dwarf stars, doofus.

And what you just quoted about doesn't even mention then.

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
https://ia803200.us.archive.org/11/items/mdocs/Books/The%20Next%20End%20of%20the%20World%20-%20The%20Rebirth%20of%20Catastrophism%20by%20Ben%20Davidson%20%282021%29.pdf
Earth has magnetic reversals and magnetic excursions. Reversals include a flip of Earth’s
magnetic field after long (100,000s of years) epochs, while excursions are rapid flips and
flips-back of the magnetic pole. Both events include an intensity minimum during the flip
that allows space energy to penetrate into the Earth system. Excursions occur much more
frequently than full reversals, somewhere around 10,000 - 15,000 years apart on average.
While some researchers believe the cycle to be relatively exact, everything from ~11,500
years (Walker) to exactly 12,068 years (Douglas Vogt), to 21,000 - 26,000 years
(axial/apsidal precession catastrophism theory), the geologic evidence available today
tells a slightly more complex story of the processes involved.
In modern science, there are some recognized events that paint a scary picture of the
near-term future. Excursions have taken place ~12,000 - 13,000 years ago (Gothenburg),
~24,000 - 28,000 years ago (Lake Mungo), ~33,000 - 37,000 years ago (Mono Lake),
~41,000 - 46,000 years ago (Laschamp), ~60,000 years ago (Greenland/Vostok), and
~72,000 years ago (Toba). A rapid look at the most recent events shows ~12,000 to 13,000
years between them, meaning that the cycle is approximately due to reset now. While
the exact dating of these events has endured considerable disagreement (as evidenced
by the uncertainty of time in which they are supposed to have occurred) they tell a story
of a recurring magnetic change on our planet, one that matches other cycle timelines
and the evidence of disaste

I'm fully aware that the Earth has had magnetic reversals, doofus.

But where does that say anything about there being any connection to
changes in climate?

Phil Hendry's Chop shop

2024-04-14 14:46:22 UTC

On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 16:16:02 -0700

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 13:56:32 -0700

Post by Alan
I didn't

https://ro.uow.edu.au/era/73/
Australia’s oldest human remains, found at Lake Mungo, include the
world’s oldest ritual ochre burial (Mungo III) and the first
recorded cremation (Mungo I). Until now, the importance of these
finds has been constrained by limited chronologies and
palaeoenvironmental information. Mungo III, the source of the
world’s oldest human mitochondrial DNA, has been variously
estimated at 30 thousand years (kyr) old, 42–45 kyr old and 62 +/-
6 kyr old. while radiocarbon estimates placed theMungo I cremation
near 20–26 kyr ago. Here we report a new series of 25 optical ages
showing that both burials occurred at 40 +/- 2 kyr ago and that
humans were present at Lake Mungo by 50–46 kyr ago, synchronously
with, or soon after, initial occupation of northern and western
Australia. Stratigraphic evidence indicates fluctuations between
lake-full and drier conditions from 50 to 40 kyr ago,
simultaneously with increased dust deposition, human arrival and
continent-wide extinction of the megafauna. This was followed by
sustained aridity between 40 and 30 kyr ago. This new chronology
corrects previous estimates for human burials at this important
site and provides a new picture of Homo sapiens adapting to
deteriorating climate in the world’s driest inhabited continent.

Micronovas are phenomenon of white dwarf stars, doofus.

Not exclusively, not at all!

Post by Alan
And what you just quoted about doesn't even mention then.Den

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
https://ia803200.us.archive.org/11/items/mdocs/Books/The%20Next%20End%20of%20the%20World%20-%20The%20Rebirth%20of%20Catastrophism%20by%20Ben%20Davidson%20%282021%29.pdf
Earth has magnetic reversals and magnetic excursions. Reversals
include a flip of Earth’s magnetic field after long (100,000s of
years) epochs, while excursions are rapid flips and flips-back of
the magnetic pole. Both events include an intensity minimum during
the flip that allows space energy to penetrate into the Earth
system. Excursions occur much more frequently than full reversals,
somewhere around 10,000 - 15,000 years apart on average. While some
researchers believe the cycle to be relatively exact, everything
from ~11,500 years (Walker) to exactly 12,068 years (Douglas Vogt),
to 21,000 - 26,000 years (axial/apsidal precession catastrophism
theory), the geologic evidence available today tells a slightly
more complex story of the processes involved. In modern science,
there are some recognized events that paint a scary picture of the
near-term future. Excursions have taken place ~12,000 - 13,000
years ago (Gothenburg), ~24,000 - 28,000 years ago (Lake Mungo),
~33,000 - 37,000 years ago (Mono Lake), ~41,000 - 46,000 years ago
(Laschamp), ~60,000 years ago (Greenland/Vostok), and ~72,000 years
ago (Toba). A rapid look at the most recent events shows ~12,000 to
13,000 years between them, meaning that the cycle is approximately
due to reset now. While the exact dating of these events has
endured considerable disagreement (as evidenced by the uncertainty
of time in which they are supposed to have occurred) they tell a
story of a recurring magnetic change on our planet, one that
matches other cycle timelines and the evidence of disaste

I'm fully aware that the Earth has had magnetic reversals, doofus.
But where does that say anything about there being any connection to
changes in climate?

Dense, aren't ya?

https://ia803200.us.archive.org/11/items/mdocs/Books/The%20Next%20End%20of%20the%20World%20-%20The%20Rebirth%20of%20Catastrophism%20by%20Ben%20Davidson%20%282021%29.pdf

There has been at least some level of biosphere stress with all the recent geomagnetic
excursions, but some are definitely worse than others. During some, a tremendous
amount of the biosphere disappears, for others, it might be several bad surge deposits
with perhaps only 10% to 20% of species’ population numbers being lost- and few
extinctions. One piece of excellent news is that we have not seen two of the terrible ones
in a row, and the last one was a terrible one.
In the next chart, we find the known geomagnetic excursions dating back to the “Blake”
event, with a biosphere impact score for each. A 10/10 would be a complete
extermination of life on Earth. 9/10 is catastrophic/extreme, like Toba, when as little as a
few dozen reproducing human females survived. For comparison, a major hurricane or
earthquake is unlikely to even register a “1” on this chart, and a volcanic eruption that
cools the planet 2-3 degrees might be a “1-3”.
Excursion Name Estimate Time Biosphere Impact /10
Gothenburg ~12,000 years ago 8/10 (Severe)
Lake Mungo 24 - 28,000 years ago 4/10
Mono Lake 33 - 37,000 years ago 5/10
Laschamp 41 - 46,000 years ago 8/10 (Severe)
Vostok/Greenland ~60,000 years ago 5/10
Toba ~72,000 years ago 9/10 (Extreme)
??? ~84,000 years ago <4/10
??? ~96,000 years ago <4/10
Blake 105-115,000 years ago 8/10 (Severe)

Alan

2024-04-14 16:32:44 UTC

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 16:16:02 -0700

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 13:56:32 -0700

Post by Alan
I didn't

https://ro.uow.edu.au/era/73/
Australia’s oldest human remains, found at Lake Mungo, include the
world’s oldest ritual ochre burial (Mungo III) and the first
recorded cremation (Mungo I). Until now, the importance of these
finds has been constrained by limited chronologies and
palaeoenvironmental information. Mungo III, the source of the
world’s oldest human mitochondrial DNA, has been variously
estimated at 30 thousand years (kyr) old, 42–45 kyr old and 62 +/-
6 kyr old. while radiocarbon estimates placed theMungo I cremation
near 20–26 kyr ago. Here we report a new series of 25 optical ages
showing that both burials occurred at 40 +/- 2 kyr ago and that
humans were present at Lake Mungo by 50–46 kyr ago, synchronously
with, or soon after, initial occupation of northern and western
Australia. Stratigraphic evidence indicates fluctuations between
lake-full and drier conditions from 50 to 40 kyr ago,
simultaneously with increased dust deposition, human arrival and
continent-wide extinction of the megafauna. This was followed by
sustained aridity between 40 and 30 kyr ago. This new chronology
corrects previous estimates for human burials at this important
site and provides a new picture of Homo sapiens adapting to
deteriorating climate in the world’s driest inhabited continent.

Micronovas are phenomenon of white dwarf stars, doofus.

Not exclusively, not at all!

Post by Alan
And what you just quoted about doesn't even mention then.Den

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
https://ia803200.us.archive.org/11/items/mdocs/Books/The%20Next%20End%20of%20the%20World%20-%20The%20Rebirth%20of%20Catastrophism%20by%20Ben%20Davidson%20%282021%29.pdf
Earth has magnetic reversals and magnetic excursions. Reversals
include a flip of Earth’s magnetic field after long (100,000s of
years) epochs, while excursions are rapid flips and flips-back of
the magnetic pole. Both events include an intensity minimum during
the flip that allows space energy to penetrate into the Earth
system. Excursions occur much more frequently than full reversals,
somewhere around 10,000 - 15,000 years apart on average. While some
researchers believe the cycle to be relatively exact, everything
from ~11,500 years (Walker) to exactly 12,068 years (Douglas Vogt),
to 21,000 - 26,000 years (axial/apsidal precession catastrophism
theory), the geologic evidence available today tells a slightly
more complex story of the processes involved. In modern science,
there are some recognized events that paint a scary picture of the
near-term future. Excursions have taken place ~12,000 - 13,000
years ago (Gothenburg), ~24,000 - 28,000 years ago (Lake Mungo),
~33,000 - 37,000 years ago (Mono Lake), ~41,000 - 46,000 years ago
(Laschamp), ~60,000 years ago (Greenland/Vostok), and ~72,000 years
ago (Toba). A rapid look at the most recent events shows ~12,000 to
13,000 years between them, meaning that the cycle is approximately
due to reset now. While the exact dating of these events has
endured considerable disagreement (as evidenced by the uncertainty
of time in which they are supposed to have occurred) they tell a
story of a recurring magnetic change on our planet, one that
matches other cycle timelines and the evidence of disaste

I'm fully aware that the Earth has had magnetic reversals, doofus.
But where does that say anything about there being any connection to
changes in climate?

Dense, aren't ya?
https://ia803200.us.archive.org/11/items/mdocs/Books/The%20Next%20End%20of%20the%20World%20-%20The%20Rebirth%20of%20Catastrophism%20by%20Ben%20Davidson%20%282021%29.pdf
There has been at least some level of biosphere stress with all the recent geomagnetic
excursions, but some are definitely worse than others. During some, a tremendous
amount of the biosphere disappears, for others, it might be several bad surge deposits
with perhaps only 10% to 20% of species’ population numbers being lost- and few
extinctions. One piece of excellent news is that we have not seen two of the terrible ones
in a row, and the last one was a terrible one.
In the next chart, we find the known geomagnetic excursions dating back to the “Blake”
event, with a biosphere impact score for each. A 10/10 would be a complete
extermination of life on Earth. 9/10 is catastrophic/extreme, like Toba, when as little as a
few dozen reproducing human females survived. For comparison, a major hurricane or
earthquake is unlikely to even register a “1” on this chart, and a volcanic eruption that
cools the planet 2-3 degrees might be a “1-3”.
Excursion Name Estimate Time Biosphere Impact /10
Gothenburg ~12,000 years ago 8/10 (Severe)
Lake Mungo 24 - 28,000 years ago 4/10
Mono Lake 33 - 37,000 years ago 5/10
Laschamp 41 - 46,000 years ago 8/10 (Severe)
Vostok/Greenland ~60,000 years ago 5/10
Toba ~72,000 years ago 9/10 (Extreme)
??? ~84,000 years ago <4/10
??? ~96,000 years ago <4/10
Blake 105-115,000 years ago 8/10 (Severe)

See my previous hint.

Phil Hendry's Chop shop

2024-04-14 16:49:05 UTC

On Sun, 14 Apr 2024 09:32:44 -0700

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 16:16:02 -0700

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 13:56:32 -0700

Post by Alan
I didn't

https://ro.uow.edu.au/era/73/
Australia’s oldest human remains, found at Lake Mungo, include the
world’s oldest ritual ochre burial (Mungo III) and the first
recorded cremation (Mungo I). Until now, the importance of these
finds has been constrained by limited chronologies and
palaeoenvironmental information. Mungo III, the source of the
world’s oldest human mitochondrial DNA, has been variously
estimated at 30 thousand years (kyr) old, 42–45 kyr old and 62 +/-
6 kyr old. while radiocarbon estimates placed theMungo I cremation
near 20–26 kyr ago. Here we report a new series of 25 optical ages
showing that both burials occurred at 40 +/- 2 kyr ago and that
humans were present at Lake Mungo by 50–46 kyr ago, synchronously
with, or soon after, initial occupation of northern and western
Australia. Stratigraphic evidence indicates fluctuations between
lake-full and drier conditions from 50 to 40 kyr ago,
simultaneously with increased dust deposition, human arrival and
continent-wide extinction of the megafauna. This was followed by
sustained aridity between 40 and 30 kyr ago. This new chronology
corrects previous estimates for human burials at this important
site and provides a new picture of Homo sapiens adapting to
deteriorating climate in the world’s driest inhabited continent.

Micronovas are phenomenon of white dwarf stars, doofus.

Not exclusively, not at all!

Post by Alan
And what you just quoted about doesn't even mention then.

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
https://ia803200.us.archive.org/11/items/mdocs/Books/The%20Next%20End%20of%20the%20World%20-%20The%20Rebirth%20of%20Catastrophism%20by%20Ben%20Davidson%20%282021%29.pdf
Earth has magnetic reversals and magnetic excursions. Reversals
include a flip of Earth’s magnetic field after long (100,000s of
years) epochs, while excursions are rapid flips and flips-back of
the magnetic pole. Both events include an intensity minimum during
the flip that allows space energy to penetrate into the Earth
system. Excursions occur much more frequently than full reversals,
somewhere around 10,000 - 15,000 years apart on average. While
some researchers believe the cycle to be relatively exact,
everything from ~11,500 years (Walker) to exactly 12,068 years
(Douglas Vogt), to 21,000 - 26,000 years (axial/apsidal
precession catastrophism theory), the geologic evidence available
today tells a slightly more complex story of the processes
involved. In modern science, there are some recognized events
that paint a scary picture of the near-term future. Excursions
have taken place ~12,000 - 13,000 years ago (Gothenburg), ~24,000
- 28,000 years ago (Lake Mungo), ~33,000 - 37,000 years ago (Mono
Lake), ~41,000 - 46,000 years ago (Laschamp), ~60,000 years ago
(Greenland/Vostok), and ~72,000 years ago (Toba). A rapid look at
the most recent events shows ~12,000 to 13,000 years between
them, meaning that the cycle is approximately due to reset now.
While the exact dating of these events has endured considerable
disagreement (as evidenced by the uncertainty of time in which
they are supposed to have occurred) they tell a story of a
recurring magnetic change on our planet, one that matches other
cycle timelines and the evidence of disaste

I'm fully aware that the Earth has had magnetic reversals, doofus.
But where does that say anything about there being any connection
to changes in climate?

Dense, aren't ya?
https://ia803200.us.archive.org/11/items/mdocs/Books/The%20Next%20End%20of%20the%20World%20-%20The%20Rebirth%20of%20Catastrophism%20by%20Ben%20Davidson%20%282021%29.pdf
There has been at least some level of biosphere stress with all the
recent geomagnetic excursions, but some are definitely worse than
others. During some, a tremendous amount of the biosphere
disappears, for others, it might be several bad surge deposits with
perhaps only 10% to 20% of species’ population numbers being lost-
and few extinctions. One piece of excellent news is that we have
not seen two of the terrible ones in a row, and the last one was a
terrible one. In the next chart, we find the known geomagnetic
excursions dating back to the “Blake” event, with a biosphere
impact score for each. A 10/10 would be a complete extermination of
life on Earth. 9/10 is catastrophic/extreme, like Toba, when as
little as a few dozen reproducing human females survived. For
comparison, a major hurricane or earthquake is unlikely to even
register a “1” on this chart, and a volcanic eruption that cools
the planet 2-3 degrees might be a “1-3”. Excursion Name Estimate
Time Biosphere Impact /10 Gothenburg ~12,000 years ago 8/10
(Severe) Lake Mungo 24 - 28,000 years ago 4/10 Mono Lake 33 -
37,000 years ago 5/10 Laschamp 41 - 46,000 years ago 8/10 (Severe)
Vostok/Greenland ~60,000 years ago 5/10 Toba ~72,000 years ago 9/10
(Extreme) ??? ~84,000 years ago <4/10
??? ~96,000 years ago <4/10
Blake 105-115,000 years ago 8/10 (Severe)

See my previous hint.

I see only your denialsm.

"Previously, researchers estimated the field was weakening about 5
percent per century, but the new data revealed the field is actually
weakening at 5 percent per decade, or 10 times faster than thought. As
such, rather than the full flip occurring in about 2,000 years, as was
predicted, the new data suggest it could happen sooner."

Dhu on Gate

2024-04-15 07:00:26 UTC

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
On Sun, 14 Apr 2024 09:32:44 -0700

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 16:16:02 -0700

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 13:56:32 -0700

Post by Alan
I didn't

https://ro.uow.edu.au/era/73/
Australia’s oldest human remains, found at Lake Mungo, include the
world’s oldest ritual ochre burial (Mungo III) and the first
recorded cremation (Mungo I). Until now, the importance of these
finds has been constrained by limited chronologies and
palaeoenvironmental information. Mungo III, the source of the
world’s oldest human mitochondrial DNA, has been variously
estimated at 30 thousand years (kyr) old, 42–45 kyr old and 62 +/-
6 kyr old. while radiocarbon estimates placed theMungo I cremation
near 20–26 kyr ago. Here we report a new series of 25 optical ages
showing that both burials occurred at 40 +/- 2 kyr ago and that
humans were present at Lake Mungo by 50–46 kyr ago, synchronously
with, or soon after, initial occupation of northern and western
Australia. Stratigraphic evidence indicates fluctuations between
lake-full and drier conditions from 50 to 40 kyr ago,
simultaneously with increased dust deposition, human arrival and
continent-wide extinction of the megafauna. This was followed by
sustained aridity between 40 and 30 kyr ago. This new chronology
corrects previous estimates for human burials at this important
site and provides a new picture of Homo sapiens adapting to
deteriorating climate in the world’s driest inhabited continent.

Micronovas are phenomenon of white dwarf stars, doofus.

Not exclusively, not at all!

Post by Alan
And what you just quoted about doesn't even mention then.

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
https://ia803200.us.archive.org/11/items/mdocs/Books/The%20Next%20End%20of%20the%20World%20-%20The%20Rebirth%20of%20Catastrophism%20by%20Ben%20Davidson%20%282021%29.pdf
Earth has magnetic reversals and magnetic excursions. Reversals
include a flip of Earth’s magnetic field after long (100,000s of
years) epochs, while excursions are rapid flips and flips-back of
the magnetic pole. Both events include an intensity minimum during
the flip that allows space energy to penetrate into the Earth
system. Excursions occur much more frequently than full reversals,
somewhere around 10,000 - 15,000 years apart on average. While
some researchers believe the cycle to be relatively exact,
everything from ~11,500 years (Walker) to exactly 12,068 years
(Douglas Vogt), to 21,000 - 26,000 years (axial/apsidal
precession catastrophism theory), the geologic evidence available
today tells a slightly more complex story of the processes
involved. In modern science, there are some recognized events
that paint a scary picture of the near-term future. Excursions
have taken place ~12,000 - 13,000 years ago (Gothenburg), ~24,000
- 28,000 years ago (Lake Mungo), ~33,000 - 37,000 years ago (Mono
Lake), ~41,000 - 46,000 years ago (Laschamp), ~60,000 years ago
(Greenland/Vostok), and ~72,000 years ago (Toba). A rapid look at
the most recent events shows ~12,000 to 13,000 years between
them, meaning that the cycle is approximately due to reset now.
While the exact dating of these events has endured considerable
disagreement (as evidenced by the uncertainty of time in which
they are supposed to have occurred) they tell a story of a
recurring magnetic change on our planet, one that matches other
cycle timelines and the evidence of disaste

I'm fully aware that the Earth has had magnetic reversals, doofus.
But where does that say anything about there being any connection
to changes in climate?

Dense, aren't ya?
https://ia803200.us.archive.org/11/items/mdocs/Books/The%20Next%20End%20of%20the%20World%20-%20The%20Rebirth%20of%20Catastrophism%20by%20Ben%20Davidson%20%282021%29.pdf
There has been at least some level of biosphere stress with all the
recent geomagnetic excursions, but some are definitely worse than
others. During some, a tremendous amount of the biosphere
disappears, for others, it might be several bad surge deposits with
perhaps only 10% to 20% of species’ population numbers being lost-
and few extinctions. One piece of excellent news is that we have
not seen two of the terrible ones in a row, and the last one was a
terrible one. In the next chart, we find the known geomagnetic
excursions dating back to the “Blake” event, with a biosphere
impact score for each. A 10/10 would be a complete extermination of
life on Earth. 9/10 is catastrophic/extreme, like Toba, when as
little as a few dozen reproducing human females survived. For
comparison, a major hurricane or earthquake is unlikely to even
register a “1” on this chart, and a volcanic eruption that cools
the planet 2-3 degrees might be a “1-3”. Excursion Name Estimate
Time Biosphere Impact /10 Gothenburg ~12,000 years ago 8/10
(Severe) Lake Mungo 24 - 28,000 years ago 4/10 Mono Lake 33 -
37,000 years ago 5/10 Laschamp 41 - 46,000 years ago 8/10 (Severe)
Vostok/Greenland ~60,000 years ago 5/10 Toba ~72,000 years ago 9/10
(Extreme) ??? ~84,000 years ago <4/10
??? ~96,000 years ago <4/10
Blake 105-115,000 years ago 8/10 (Severe)

See my previous hint.

I see only your denialsm.

Al is an Anocrat: denial is their raison'd'etre.
You won't see anything else.

Dhu

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
"Previously, researchers estimated the field was weakening about 5
percent per century, but the new data revealed the field is actually
weakening at 5 percent per decade, or 10 times faster than thought. As
such, rather than the full flip occurring in about 2,000 years, as was
predicted, the new data suggest it could happen sooner."

--
Je suis Canadien. Ce n'est pas Francais ou Anglais.
C'est une esp`ece de sauvage: ne obliviscaris, vix ea nostra voco;-)
Duncan Patton a Campbell

Alan

2024-04-15 20:04:03 UTC

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
On Sun, 14 Apr 2024 09:32:44 -0700

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 16:16:02 -0700

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 13:56:32 -0700

Post by Alan
I didn't

https://ro.uow.edu.au/era/73/
Australia’s oldest human remains, found at Lake Mungo, include the
world’s oldest ritual ochre burial (Mungo III) and the first
recorded cremation (Mungo I). Until now, the importance of these
finds has been constrained by limited chronologies and
palaeoenvironmental information. Mungo III, the source of the
world’s oldest human mitochondrial DNA, has been variously
estimated at 30 thousand years (kyr) old, 42–45 kyr old and 62 +/-
6 kyr old. while radiocarbon estimates placed theMungo I cremation
near 20–26 kyr ago. Here we report a new series of 25 optical ages
showing that both burials occurred at 40 +/- 2 kyr ago and that
humans were present at Lake Mungo by 50–46 kyr ago, synchronously
with, or soon after, initial occupation of northern and western
Australia. Stratigraphic evidence indicates fluctuations between
lake-full and drier conditions from 50 to 40 kyr ago,
simultaneously with increased dust deposition, human arrival and
continent-wide extinction of the megafauna. This was followed by
sustained aridity between 40 and 30 kyr ago. This new chronology
corrects previous estimates for human burials at this important
site and provides a new picture of Homo sapiens adapting to
deteriorating climate in the world’s driest inhabited continent.

Micronovas are phenomenon of white dwarf stars, doofus.

Not exclusively, not at all!

Post by Alan
And what you just quoted about doesn't even mention then.

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
https://ia803200.us.archive.org/11/items/mdocs/Books/The%20Next%20End%20of%20the%20World%20-%20The%20Rebirth%20of%20Catastrophism%20by%20Ben%20Davidson%20%282021%29.pdf
Earth has magnetic reversals and magnetic excursions. Reversals
include a flip of Earth’s magnetic field after long (100,000s of
years) epochs, while excursions are rapid flips and flips-back of
the magnetic pole. Both events include an intensity minimum during
the flip that allows space energy to penetrate into the Earth
system. Excursions occur much more frequently than full reversals,
somewhere around 10,000 - 15,000 years apart on average. While
some researchers believe the cycle to be relatively exact,
everything from ~11,500 years (Walker) to exactly 12,068 years
(Douglas Vogt), to 21,000 - 26,000 years (axial/apsidal
precession catastrophism theory), the geologic evidence available
today tells a slightly more complex story of the processes
involved. In modern science, there are some recognized events
that paint a scary picture of the near-term future. Excursions
have taken place ~12,000 - 13,000 years ago (Gothenburg), ~24,000
- 28,000 years ago (Lake Mungo), ~33,000 - 37,000 years ago (Mono
Lake), ~41,000 - 46,000 years ago (Laschamp), ~60,000 years ago
(Greenland/Vostok), and ~72,000 years ago (Toba). A rapid look at
the most recent events shows ~12,000 to 13,000 years between
them, meaning that the cycle is approximately due to reset now.
While the exact dating of these events has endured considerable
disagreement (as evidenced by the uncertainty of time in which
they are supposed to have occurred) they tell a story of a
recurring magnetic change on our planet, one that matches other
cycle timelines and the evidence of disaste

I'm fully aware that the Earth has had magnetic reversals, doofus.
But where does that say anything about there being any connection
to changes in climate?

Dense, aren't ya?
https://ia803200.us.archive.org/11/items/mdocs/Books/The%20Next%20End%20of%20the%20World%20-%20The%20Rebirth%20of%20Catastrophism%20by%20Ben%20Davidson%20%282021%29.pdf
There has been at least some level of biosphere stress with all the
recent geomagnetic excursions, but some are definitely worse than
others. During some, a tremendous amount of the biosphere
disappears, for others, it might be several bad surge deposits with
perhaps only 10% to 20% of species’ population numbers being lost-
and few extinctions. One piece of excellent news is that we have
not seen two of the terrible ones in a row, and the last one was a
terrible one. In the next chart, we find the known geomagnetic
excursions dating back to the “Blake” event, with a biosphere
impact score for each. A 10/10 would be a complete extermination of
life on Earth. 9/10 is catastrophic/extreme, like Toba, when as
little as a few dozen reproducing human females survived. For
comparison, a major hurricane or earthquake is unlikely to even
register a “1” on this chart, and a volcanic eruption that cools
the planet 2-3 degrees might be a “1-3”. Excursion Name Estimate
Time Biosphere Impact /10 Gothenburg ~12,000 years ago 8/10
(Severe) Lake Mungo 24 - 28,000 years ago 4/10 Mono Lake 33 -
37,000 years ago 5/10 Laschamp 41 - 46,000 years ago 8/10 (Severe)
Vostok/Greenland ~60,000 years ago 5/10 Toba ~72,000 years ago 9/10
(Extreme) ??? ~84,000 years ago <4/10
??? ~96,000 years ago <4/10
Blake 105-115,000 years ago 8/10 (Severe)

See my previous hint.

I see only your denialsm.
"Previously, researchers estimated the field was weakening about 5
percent per century, but the new data revealed the field is actually
weakening at 5 percent per decade, or 10 times faster than thought. As
such, rather than the full flip occurring in about 2,000 years, as was
predicted, the new data suggest it could happen sooner."

Which as I already stated in my other reply is in disagreement with your
earlier cited work claiming 5% per year ("annually")

Lil-man-ball

2024-04-15 20:36:19 UTC

On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 13:04:03 -0700

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
On Sun, 14 Apr 2024 09:32:44 -0700

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 16:16:02 -0700

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 13:56:32 -0700

Post by Alan
I didn't

https://ro.uow.edu.au/era/73/
Australia’s oldest human remains, found at Lake Mungo, include
the world’s oldest ritual ochre burial (Mungo III) and the first
recorded cremation (Mungo I). Until now, the importance of these
finds has been constrained by limited chronologies and
palaeoenvironmental information. Mungo III, the source of the
world’s oldest human mitochondrial DNA, has been variously
estimated at 30 thousand years (kyr) old, 42–45 kyr old and 62
+/- 6 kyr old. while radiocarbon estimates placed theMungo I
cremation near 20–26 kyr ago. Here we report a new series of 25
optical ages showing that both burials occurred at 40 +/- 2 kyr
ago and that humans were present at Lake Mungo by 50–46 kyr
ago, synchronously with, or soon after, initial occupation of
northern and western Australia. Stratigraphic evidence
indicates fluctuations between lake-full and drier conditions
from 50 to 40 kyr ago, simultaneously with increased dust
deposition, human arrival and continent-wide extinction of the
megafauna. This was followed by sustained aridity between 40
and 30 kyr ago. This new chronology corrects previous estimates
for human burials at this important site and provides a new
picture of Homo sapiens adapting to deteriorating climate in
the world’s driest inhabited continent.

Micronovas are phenomenon of white dwarf stars, doofus.

Not exclusively, not at all!

Post by Alan
And what you just quoted about doesn't even mention then.

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
https://ia803200.us.archive.org/11/items/mdocs/Books/The%20Next%20End%20of%20the%20World%20-%20The%20Rebirth%20of%20Catastrophism%20by%20Ben%20Davidson%20%282021%29.pdf
Earth has magnetic reversals and magnetic excursions. Reversals
include a flip of Earth’s magnetic field after long (100,000s of
years) epochs, while excursions are rapid flips and flips-back
of the magnetic pole. Both events include an intensity minimum
during the flip that allows space energy to penetrate into the
Earth system. Excursions occur much more frequently than full
reversals, somewhere around 10,000 - 15,000 years apart on
average. While some researchers believe the cycle to be
relatively exact, everything from ~11,500 years (Walker) to
exactly 12,068 years (Douglas Vogt), to 21,000 - 26,000 years
(axial/apsidal precession catastrophism theory), the geologic
evidence available today tells a slightly more complex story of
the processes involved. In modern science, there are some
recognized events that paint a scary picture of the near-term
future. Excursions have taken place ~12,000 - 13,000 years ago
(Gothenburg), ~24,000
- 28,000 years ago (Lake Mungo), ~33,000 - 37,000 years ago
(Mono Lake), ~41,000 - 46,000 years ago (Laschamp), ~60,000
years ago (Greenland/Vostok), and ~72,000 years ago (Toba). A
rapid look at the most recent events shows ~12,000 to 13,000
years between them, meaning that the cycle is approximately due
to reset now. While the exact dating of these events has
endured considerable disagreement (as evidenced by the
uncertainty of time in which they are supposed to have
occurred) they tell a story of a recurring magnetic change on
our planet, one that matches other cycle timelines and the
evidence of disaste

I'm fully aware that the Earth has had magnetic reversals, doofus.
But where does that say anything about there being any connection
to changes in climate?

Dense, aren't ya?
https://ia803200.us.archive.org/11/items/mdocs/Books/The%20Next%20End%20of%20the%20World%20-%20The%20Rebirth%20of%20Catastrophism%20by%20Ben%20Davidson%20%282021%29.pdf
There has been at least some level of biosphere stress with all
the recent geomagnetic excursions, but some are definitely worse
than others. During some, a tremendous amount of the biosphere
disappears, for others, it might be several bad surge deposits
with perhaps only 10% to 20% of species’ population numbers being
lost- and few extinctions. One piece of excellent news is that we
have not seen two of the terrible ones in a row, and the last one
was a terrible one. In the next chart, we find the known
geomagnetic excursions dating back to the “Blake” event, with a
biosphere impact score for each. A 10/10 would be a complete
extermination of life on Earth. 9/10 is catastrophic/extreme,
like Toba, when as little as a few dozen reproducing human
females survived. For comparison, a major hurricane or earthquake
is unlikely to even register a “1” on this chart, and a volcanic
eruption that cools the planet 2-3 degrees might be a “1-3”.
Excursion Name Estimate Time Biosphere Impact /10 Gothenburg
~12,000 years ago 8/10 (Severe) Lake Mungo 24 - 28,000 years ago
4/10 Mono Lake 33 - 37,000 years ago 5/10 Laschamp 41 - 46,000
years ago 8/10 (Severe) Vostok/Greenland ~60,000 years ago 5/10
Toba ~72,000 years ago 9/10 (Extreme) ??? ~84,000 years ago <4/10
??? ~96,000 years ago <4/10
Blake 105-115,000 years ago 8/10 (Severe)

See my previous hint.

I see only your denialsm.
"Previously, researchers estimated the field was weakening about 5
percent per century, but the new data revealed the field is actually
weakening at 5 percent per decade, or 10 times faster than thought.
As such, rather than the full flip occurring in about 2,000 years,
as was predicted, the new data suggest it could happen sooner."

Which as I already stated in my other reply is in disagreement with
your earlier cited work claiming 5% per year ("annually")

Uh...the reportage on the drop indicates a strong fall-off of late.

https://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Earth-dipole-moment.jpg

It's just dropping like a stone, innit chucklenuts?

Alan

2024-04-15 21:10:31 UTC

Post by Lil-man-ball
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 13:04:03 -0700

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
On Sun, 14 Apr 2024 09:32:44 -0700

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 16:16:02 -0700

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 13:56:32 -0700

Post by Alan
I didn't

https://ro.uow.edu.au/era/73/
Australia’s oldest human remains, found at Lake Mungo, include
the world’s oldest ritual ochre burial (Mungo III) and the first
recorded cremation (Mungo I). Until now, the importance of these
finds has been constrained by limited chronologies and
palaeoenvironmental information. Mungo III, the source of the
world’s oldest human mitochondrial DNA, has been variously
estimated at 30 thousand years (kyr) old, 42–45 kyr old and 62
+/- 6 kyr old. while radiocarbon estimates placed theMungo I
cremation near 20–26 kyr ago. Here we report a new series of 25
optical ages showing that both burials occurred at 40 +/- 2 kyr
ago and that humans were present at Lake Mungo by 50–46 kyr
ago, synchronously with, or soon after, initial occupation of
northern and western Australia. Stratigraphic evidence
indicates fluctuations between lake-full and drier conditions
from 50 to 40 kyr ago, simultaneously with increased dust
deposition, human arrival and continent-wide extinction of the
megafauna. This was followed by sustained aridity between 40
and 30 kyr ago. This new chronology corrects previous estimates
for human burials at this important site and provides a new
picture of Homo sapiens adapting to deteriorating climate in
the world’s driest inhabited continent.

Micronovas are phenomenon of white dwarf stars, doofus.

Not exclusively, not at all!

Post by Alan
And what you just quoted about doesn't even mention then.

Post by Phil Hendry's Chop shop
https://ia803200.us.archive.org/11/items/mdocs/Books/The%20Next%20End%20of%20the%20World%20-%20The%20Rebirth%20of%20Catastrophism%20by%20Ben%20Davidson%20%282021%29.pdf
Earth has magnetic reversals and magnetic excursions. Reversals
include a flip of Earth’s magnetic field after long (100,000s of
years) epochs, while excursions are rapid flips and flips-back
of the magnetic pole. Both events include an intensity minimum
during the flip that allows space energy to penetrate into the
Earth system. Excursions occur much more frequently than full
reversals, somewhere around 10,000 - 15,000 years apart on
average. While some researchers believe the cycle to be
relatively exact, everything from ~11,500 years (Walker) to
exactly 12,068 years (Douglas Vogt), to 21,000 - 26,000 years
(axial/apsidal precession catastrophism theory), the geologic
evidence available today tells a slightly more complex story of
the processes involved. In modern science, there are some
recognized events that paint a scary picture of the near-term
future. Excursions have taken place ~12,000 - 13,000 years ago
(Gothenburg), ~24,000
- 28,000 years ago (Lake Mungo), ~33,000 - 37,000 years ago
(Mono Lake), ~41,000 - 46,000 years ago (Laschamp), ~60,000
years ago (Greenland/Vostok), and ~72,000 years ago (Toba). A
rapid look at the most recent events shows ~12,000 to 13,000
years between them, meaning that the cycle is approximately due
to reset now. While the exact dating of these events has
endured considerable disagreement (as evidenced by the
uncertainty of time in which they are supposed to have
occurred) they tell a story of a recurring magnetic change on
our planet, one that matches other cycle timelines and the
evidence of disaste

I'm fully aware that the Earth has had magnetic reversals, doofus.
But where does that say anything about there being any connection
to changes in climate?

Dense, aren't ya?
https://ia803200.us.archive.org/11/items/mdocs/Books/The%20Next%20End%20of%20the%20World%20-%20The%20Rebirth%20of%20Catastrophism%20by%20Ben%20Davidson%20%282021%29.pdf
There has been at least some level of biosphere stress with all
the recent geomagnetic excursions, but some are definitely worse
than others. During some, a tremendous amount of the biosphere
disappears, for others, it might be several bad surge deposits
with perhaps only 10% to 20% of species’ population numbers being
lost- and few extinctions. One piece of excellent news is that we
have not seen two of the terrible ones in a row, and the last one
was a terrible one. In the next chart, we find the known
geomagnetic excursions dating back to the “Blake” event, with a
biosphere impact score for each. A 10/10 would be a complete
extermination of life on Earth. 9/10 is catastrophic/extreme,
like Toba, when as little as a few dozen reproducing human
females survived. For comparison, a major hurricane or earthquake
is unlikely to even register a “1” on this chart, and a volcanic
eruption that cools the planet 2-3 degrees might be a “1-3”.
Excursion Name Estimate Time Biosphere Impact /10 Gothenburg
~12,000 years ago 8/10 (Severe) Lake Mungo 24 - 28,000 years ago
4/10 Mono Lake 33 - 37,000 years ago 5/10 Laschamp 41 - 46,000
years ago 8/10 (Severe) Vostok/Greenland ~60,000 years ago 5/10
Toba ~72,000 years ago 9/10 (Extreme) ??? ~84,000 years ago <4/10
??? ~96,000 years ago <4/10
Blake 105-115,000 years ago 8/10 (Severe)

See my previous hint.

I see only your denialsm.
"Previously, researchers estimated the field was weakening about 5
percent per century, but the new data revealed the field is actually
weakening at 5 percent per decade, or 10 times faster than thought.
As such, rather than the full flip occurring in about 2,000 years,
as was predicted, the new data suggest it could happen sooner."

Which as I already stated in my other reply is in disagreement with
your earlier cited work claiming 5% per year ("annually")

Uh...the reportage on the drop indicates a strong fall-off of late.
https://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Earth-dipole-moment.jpg
It's just dropping like a stone, innit chucklenuts?

A classic example of what happens when you don't run a chart from zero...

...and isn't it odd that it doesn't include anything past the year 2000?

And of course, you conveniently leave out what the actual web page that
uses that graphic has to say:

'This figure from the study shows the team’s reconstruction of the
Earth’s DM over the past 9,000 years. They based their reconstruction on
different prior measurements of the Earth’s DM. The thin black lines
show the 95% credible interval of the preferred pfm9k.2 (paleomagnetic
field model) case. Overall, the graph shows that the current weakening
of the magnetic field is a recurring phenomenon and doesn’t indicate an
upcoming pole reversal. Image Credit: Nilsson et al. 2022.'

Lil-man-ball

2024-04-15 21:33:33 UTC

On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 14:10:31 -0700

Post by Lil-man-ball
https://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Earth-dipole-moment.jpg
It's just dropping like a stone, innit chucklenuts?

A classic example of what happens when you don't run a chart from zero...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_magnetic_field#/media/File:Geomagnetic_axial_dipole_strength.svg

In July 2020 scientists report that analysis of simulations and a
recent observational field model show that maximum rates of directional
change of Earth's magnetic field reached ~10° per year – almost 100
times faster than current changes and 10 times faster than previously
thought.[38][39]

Tauxe 1998, Chapter 1
"Simulations show magnetic field can change 10 times faster than previously thought". phys.org. Retrieved 16 August 2020.
Davies, Christopher J.; Constable, Catherine G. (6 July 2020). "Rapid
geomagnetic changes inferred from Earth observations and numerical
simulations". Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3371.
Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3371D. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16888-0. ISSN
2041-1723. PMC 7338531. PMID 32632222.

Alan

2024-04-15 21:37:15 UTC

Post by Lil-man-ball
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 14:10:31 -0700

Post by Lil-man-ball
https://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Earth-dipole-moment.jpg
It's just dropping like a stone, innit chucklenuts?

A classic example of what happens when you don't run a chart from zero...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_magnetic_field#/media/File:Geomagnetic_axial_dipole_strength.svg
In July 2020 scientists report that analysis of simulations and a
recent observational field model show that maximum rates of directional
change of Earth's magnetic field reached ~10° per year – almost 100
times faster than current changes and 10 times faster than previously
thought.[38][39]
Tauxe 1998, Chapter 1
"Simulations show magnetic field can change 10 times faster than previously thought". phys.org. Retrieved 16 August 2020.
Davies, Christopher J.; Constable, Catherine G. (6 July 2020). "Rapid
geomagnetic changes inferred from Earth observations and numerical
simulations". Nature Communications. 11 (1): 3371.
Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3371D. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16888-0. ISSN
2041-1723. PMC 7338531. PMID 32632222.

Again:

Another chart that makes a change look larger than it is by not running
from zero.

Lil-man-ball

2024-04-15 21:48:10 UTC

On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 14:37:15 -0700

Post by Alan
Another chart that makes a change look larger than it is by not
running from zero.

The component of change is over 400 years,cope.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_magnetic_field#/media/File:Geomagnetic_axial_dipole_strength.svg

Here's the other 250 year run chart, it's even worse!

https://twitter.com/CPoppino/status/1776384293268590834/photo/1

And:

https://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Earth-dipole-moment.jpg

Now we're seeing a 9,000 year run!

Mercy!

Your arse is in shreds, chucklenuts.

Alan

2024-04-15 22:04:04 UTC

Post by Lil-man-ball
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 14:37:15 -0700

Post by Alan
Another chart that makes a change look larger than it is by not
running from zero.

The component of change is over 400 years,cope.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_magnetic_field#/media/File:Geomagnetic_axial_dipole_strength.svg

But not from zero in the vertical scale.

Post by Lil-man-ball
Here's the other 250 year run chart, it's even worse!
https://twitter.com/CPoppino/status/1776384293268590834/photo/1

But no source...

...AND it is extrapolation past the last (unsourced) data point.

Post by Lil-man-ball
https://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Earth-dipole-moment.jpg
Now we're seeing a 9,000 year run!

And again: not from zero in the vertical scale.

Lil-man-ball

2024-04-15 22:12:04 UTC

On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 15:04:04 -0700

Post by Alan
But no source...
...AND

Alan

2024-04-15 22:38:55 UTC

Post by Lil-man-ball
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 15:04:04 -0700

Post by Alan
But no source...
...AND

Do you think posting the same thing again...

...after you've been rebutted on each point...

...do you think that makes you look clever?

Post by Lil-man-ball
The component of change is over 400 years,cope.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_magnetic_field#/media/File:Geomagnetic_axial_dipole_strength.svg

But not from zero in the vertical scale.

Post by Lil-man-ball
Here's the other 250 year run chart, it's even worse!
https://twitter.com/CPoppino/status/1776384293268590834/photo/1

But no source...

...AND it is extrapolation past the last (unsourced) data point.
https://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Earth-dipole-moment.jpg

Post by Lil-man-ball
Now we're seeing a 9,000 year run!

And again: not from zero in the vertical scale.

Lil-man-ball

2024-04-15 22:41:46 UTC

On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 15:38:55 -0700

Post by Alan
Do you think posting the same thing again...

Alan

2024-04-15 22:47:50 UTC

Post by Lil-man-ball
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 15:38:55 -0700

Post by Alan
Do you think posting the same thing again...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_magnetic_field#/media/File:Geomagnetic_axial_dipole_strength.svg
Here's the other 250 year run chart, it's even worse!
https://twitter.com/CPoppino/status/1776384293268590834/photo/1
https://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Earth-dipole-moment.jpg
Now we're seeing a 9,000 year run!
Mercy!
Your arse is in shreds, chucklenuts.

Do you think posting the same thing again...

...after you've been rebutted on each point...

...do you think that makes you look clever?

Lil-man-ball

2024-04-15 20:56:30 UTC

On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 13:04:03 -0700

Post by Alan
Which as I already stated in my other reply is in disagreement

https://twitter.com/CPoppino/status/1776384293268590834/photo/1

Alan

2024-04-15 21:12:16 UTC

Post by Lil-man-ball
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 13:04:03 -0700

Post by Alan
Which as I already stated in my other reply is in disagreement

https://twitter.com/CPoppino/status/1776384293268590834/photo/1

Which I already stated is attempting extrapolation using "data" of
unstated provenance.

And the whole thing is from the same crackpot:

'Ben Davidson, Founder of SpaceWeatherNews, Suspicious0bservers,
Observer Ranch'

Lil-man-ball

2024-04-15 21:40:20 UTC

On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 14:12:16 -0700

Post by Lil-man-ball
https://twitter.com/CPoppino/status/1776384293268590834/photo/1

Which I already stated is attempting extrapolation using "data" of
unstated provenance.

You're just going down in FLAMES today, chucklenuts:

https://earth-planets-space.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40623-020-01279-y

Loading Image...

https://www.esa.int/Applications/Observing_the_Earth/FutureEO/Swarm/Swarm_probes_weakening_of_Earth_s_magnetic_field

https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Videos/2020/05/South_Atlantic_Anomaly_impact_radiation

Alan

2024-04-15 22:09:29 UTC

Post by Lil-man-ball
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 14:12:16 -0700

Post by Lil-man-ball
https://twitter.com/CPoppino/status/1776384293268590834/photo/1

Which I already stated is attempting extrapolation using "data" of
unstated provenance.

https://earth-planets-space.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40623-020-01279-y

You should learn to READ your cites, doofus:

'We predict that the axial dipole will keep on decreasing at a rate that
will slightly increase over the next half-century. The overall SAA field
intensity will drop by another 10%, continue its drift further westward
and increase its longitudinal extent.'

So another 10% over the next FIFTY YEARS!

And they say of their own conclusions:

'However, these predictions should be taken with care, since a careful
analysis of model errors has not yet been taken into account.'

Post by Lil-man-ball
https://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs40623-020-01279-y/MediaObjects/40623_2020_1279_Fig2_HTML.png?as=webp

Same source: same comments.

Post by Lil-man-ball
https://www.esa.int/Applications/Observing_the_Earth/FutureEO/Swarm/Swarm_probes_weakening_of_Earth_s_magnetic_field

Where it says:

'Over the last 200 years, the magnetic field has lost around 9% of its
strength on a global average.'

And:

'It has been speculated whether the current weakening of the field is a
sign that Earth is heading for an eminent pole reversal – in which the
north and south magnetic poles switch places. Such events have occurred
many times throughout the planet’s history and even though we are long
overdue by the average rate at which these reversals take place (roughly
every 250 000 years), the intensity dip in the South Atlantic occurring
now is well within what is considered normal levels of fluctuations.'

Post by Lil-man-ball
https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Videos/2020/05/South_Atlantic_Anomaly_impact_radiation

Lil-man-ball

2024-04-15 22:12:25 UTC

On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 15:09:29 -0700
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_magnetic_field#/media/File:Geomagnetic_axial_dipole_strength.svg

Here's the other 250 year run chart, it's even worse!

https://twitter.com/CPoppino/status/1776384293268590834/photo/1

And:

https://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Earth-dipole-moment.jpg

Now we're seeing a 9,000 year run!

Mercy!

Your arse is in shreds, chucklenuts.

Alan

2024-04-15 22:39:13 UTC

Post by Lil-man-ball
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 15:09:29 -0700
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_magnetic_field#/media/File:Geomagnetic_axial_dipole_strength.svg
Here's the other 250 year run chart, it's even worse!
https://twitter.com/CPoppino/status/1776384293268590834/photo/1
https://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Earth-dipole-moment.jpg
Now we're seeing a 9,000 year run!
Mercy!
Your arse is in shreds, chucklenuts.

Says the guy reduced to reposting the same thing over and over...

Lil-man-ball

2024-04-15 22:42:01 UTC

On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 15:39:13 -0700

Post by Lil-man-ball
Your arse is in shreds, chucklenuts.

Says the guy reduced to reposting

Alan

2024-04-15 22:47:56 UTC

Post by Lil-man-ball
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 15:39:13 -0700

Post by Lil-man-ball
Your arse is in shreds, chucklenuts.

Says the guy reduced to reposting

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_magnetic_field#/media/File:Geomagnetic_axial_dipole_strength.svg
Here's the other 250 year run chart, it's even worse!
https://twitter.com/CPoppino/status/1776384293268590834/photo/1
https://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Earth-dipole-moment.jpg
Now we're seeing a 9,000 year run!
Mercy!
Your arse is in shreds, chucklenuts.

Do you think posting the same thing again...

...after you've been rebutted on each point...

...do you think that makes you look clever?

Lil-man-ball

2024-04-15 21:01:35 UTC

On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 13:04:03 -0700

Post by Alan
I already stated in my other reply is in disagreement with your
earlier cited work claiming 5% per year ("annually")

https://twitter.com/CPoppino/status/1776384293268590834/photo/1

Alan

2024-04-15 21:13:50 UTC

Post by Lil-man-ball
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 13:04:03 -0700

Post by Alan
I already stated in my other reply is in disagreement with your
earlier cited work claiming 5% per year ("annually")

https://twitter.com/CPoppino/status/1776384293268590834/photo/1

You really have nothing.

Lil-man-ball

2024-04-15 21:42:23 UTC

On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 14:13:50 -0700

Post by Lil-man-ball
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 13:04:03 -0700

Post by Alan
I already stated in my other reply is in disagreement with your
earlier cited work claiming 5% per year ("annually")

https://twitter.com/CPoppino/status/1776384293268590834/photo/1

You really have nothing.

Alan

2024-04-15 22:47:14 UTC

Post by Lil-man-ball
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 14:13:50 -0700

Post by Lil-man-ball
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 13:04:03 -0700

Post by Alan
I already stated in my other reply is in disagreement with your
earlier cited work claiming 5% per year ("annually")

https://twitter.com/CPoppino/status/1776384293268590834/photo/1

You really have nothing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_magnetic_field
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_magnetic_field#/media/File:Geomagnetic_axial_dipole_strength.svg
In July 2020 scientists report that analysis of simulations and a
recent observational field model show that maximum rates of directional
change of Earth's magnetic field reached ~10° per year – almost 100
times faster than current changes and 10 times faster than previously
thought.

Debunked once, no matter how many times you've posted it (now at 4)

Lil-man-ball

2024-04-15 22:48:41 UTC

On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 15:47:14 -0700

Post by Alan
Debunked

Alan

2024-04-15 22:49:04 UTC

Post by Lil-man-ball
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 15:47:14 -0700

Post by Alan
Debunked

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_magnetic_field#/media/File:Geomagnetic_axial_dipole_strength.svg
Here's the other 250 year run chart, it's even worse!
https://twitter.com/CPoppino/status/1776384293268590834/photo/1
https://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Earth-dipole-moment.jpg
Now we're seeing a 9,000 year run!
Mercy!
Your arse is in shreds, chucklenuts.

Do you think posting the same thing again...

...after you've been rebutted on each point...

...do you think that makes you look clever?

Lil-man-ball

2024-04-16 04:06:06 UTC

On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 15:49:04 -0700

Post by Alan
Do you think posting the same thing again...

Phil Hendry's Chop shop

2024-04-13 19:04:25 UTC

On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 08:55:42 -0700

Post by Alan
two data points don't represent a trend

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/geomagnetic-excursions-interglacial-termination-abrupt-climate-change.384098/

In summary, there is a significant amount of evidence that supports the
idea that geomagnetic excursions are responsible for the abrupt climate
changes seen during the Younger Dryas period. This correlation has been
observed in various studies, and it is believed that a cyclic external
event is causing these changes. The frequency of the forcing event is
around 12,000 years and is also responsible for smaller events known as
geomagnetic jerks. However, it is important to note that the external
forcing event's impact is dependent on several factors such as the
earth's axis tilt, timing of perihelion, and the distribution of
continents and ice sheets. Additionally, there is evidence of a
correlation between geomagnetic field intensity and cold climate events.

The Paleoclimatic data shows that the Younger Dryas cooling event occurred over 15 years in three 5 years steps. The entire Younger Dryas cooling event was complete in 40 years. The planet cooled from interglacial warm to within 25% of the glacial temperatures. Temperature in the North America cooled by around 18F. What is interesting is the Younger Dryas is one of a series of similar cooling events, including the termination of past interglacial periods. During the glacial period the external forcing event has less affect on the geomagnetic field and planetary temperature as the planet is already cold and vast regions of the planet's surface is covered with ice sheets which insulate the planet's surface from the cyclic forcing event, and planetary temperature is already very cold so increased GCR has less effect. The affect of the external cyclic event that is forcing the geomagnetic event it appears is dependent on the earth’s axis tilt at the time of the event, timing of perihelion, the eccentricity of the earth’s orbit, the distribution of the continents on the surface of the planet, and the area of the planet’s surface covered by ice sheets. http://www.paleomag.net/members/qingsongliu/References/EPSL/Thouveny%20excursions%20since%20400%20ka%20EPSL%202004.pdf

Reference:
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/geomagnetic-excursions-interglacial-termination-abrupt-climate-change.384098/

Wren

2024-04-15 21:58:02 UTC

Post by AlleyCat
So WHY are the chicken shit Chicken Littles screeching that we're all
going to die soon?

Once they kill off all the rightists there will be more resources for the
good people.

Dhu on Gate

2024-11-22 01:53:42 UTC